• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟实验速度条件之间和内部的个体反应时间效应:一种用于快速测试的广义线性混合模型方法。

Modelling individual response time effects between and within experimental speed conditions: A GLMM approach for speeded tests.

作者信息

Goldhammer Frank, Steinwascher Merle A, Kroehne Ulf, Naumann Johannes

机构信息

German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF), Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Centre for International Student Assessment (ZIB) e.V., Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 May;70(2):238-256. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12099.

DOI:10.1111/bmsp.12099
PMID:28474772
Abstract

Completing test items under multiple speed conditions avoids the performance measure being confounded with individual differences in the speed-accuracy compromise, and offers insights into the response process, that is, how response time relates to the probability of a correct response. This relation is traditionally represented by two conceptually different functions: the speed-accuracy trade-off function (SATF) across conditions relating the condition average response time to the condition average of accuracy, and the conditional accuracy function (CAF) within a condition describing accuracy conditional on response time. Using a generalized linear mixed modelling approach, we propose an item response modelling framework that is suitable for item response and response time data from experimental speed conditions. The proposed SATF and CAF model accommodates response time effects between conditions (i.e., person and item SATF slope) and within conditions (i.e., residual CAF slopes), captures person and item differences in these effects, and is suitable for measures with a strong speed component. Moreover, for a single condition a CAF model is proposed distinguishing person, item and residual CAF. The properties of the models are illustrated with an empirical example.

摘要

在多种速度条件下完成测试项目可避免将性能测量与速度 - 准确性权衡中的个体差异相混淆,并能深入了解反应过程,即反应时间与正确反应概率之间的关系。这种关系传统上由两个概念上不同的函数表示:跨条件的速度 - 准确性权衡函数(SATF),它将条件平均反应时间与条件平均准确性相关联;以及条件内的条件准确性函数(CAF),它描述了基于反应时间的准确性。使用广义线性混合建模方法,我们提出了一个项目反应建模框架,该框架适用于来自实验速度条件的项目反应和反应时间数据。所提出的SATF和CAF模型考虑了条件之间(即人和项目SATF斜率)以及条件内(即残差CAF斜率)的反应时间效应,捕捉了这些效应中的人和项目差异,并且适用于具有强速度成分的测量。此外,针对单个条件,提出了一个区分人和项目以及残差CAF的CAF模型。通过一个实证例子说明了模型的特性。

相似文献

1
Modelling individual response time effects between and within experimental speed conditions: A GLMM approach for speeded tests.模拟实验速度条件之间和内部的个体反应时间效应:一种用于快速测试的广义线性混合模型方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 May;70(2):238-256. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12099.
2
Spontaneous and imposed speed of cognitive test responses.认知测试反应的自发速度和强制速度。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 May;70(2):225-237. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12094. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.建模反应时与准确率之间的条件相依性。
Psychometrika. 2017 Dec;82(4):1126-1148. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9537-6. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
4
A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.用于项目反应准确性和速度的项目反应模型比较及其在自适应测试中的应用
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 May;70(2):317-345. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12101.
5
Speeded old-new recognition of multidimensional perceptual stimuli: modeling performance at the individual-participant and individual-item levels.多维感知刺激的快速新旧识别:个体参与者和个体项目水平的建模表现
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):314-34. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.2.314.
6
Accounting for individual differences in speed in the discretized signed residual time model.在离散化符号残差时间模型中考虑速度的个体差异。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2021 Jul;74 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):176-198. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12223. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
7
Distinguishing Fast and Slow Processes in Accuracy - Response Time Data.在准确性-反应时间数据中区分快速和慢速过程
PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0155149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155149. eCollection 2016.
8
Effects of alcoholism and instructional conditions on speed/accuracy tradeoffs.酗酒和教学条件对速度/准确性权衡的影响。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1991 Aug;15(4):612-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1991.tb00569.x.
9
Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracy.反应时间与反应准确性之间条件依赖关系的反应调节模型。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 May;70(2):257-279. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12076. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
10
Measuring Ability, Speed, or Both? Challenges, Psychometric Solutions, and What Can Be Gained From Experimental Control.测量能力、速度,还是两者兼顾?挑战、心理测量学解决方案以及实验控制能带来什么。
Measurement ( Mahwah N J). 2015 Oct 2;13(3-4):133-164. doi: 10.1080/15366367.2015.1100020. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Psychological Testing Using Experimental Manipulations.使用实验操作评估心理测试中的速度-准确性权衡
Educ Psychol Meas. 2024 Oct 7:00131644241271309. doi: 10.1177/00131644241271309.
2
Testing Replicability and Generalizability of the Time on Task Effect.测试任务时间效应的可重复性和普遍性。
J Intell. 2023 Apr 28;11(5):82. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11050082.
3
Incorporating Functional Response Time Effects into a Signal Detection Theory Model.将功能反应时间效应纳入信号检测理论模型。
Psychometrika. 2023 Sep;88(3):1056-1086. doi: 10.1007/s11336-023-09906-9. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
4
Generalized linear mixed-effects models for studies using different sets of stimuli across conditions.用于跨条件使用不同刺激集的研究的广义线性混合效应模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:955722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955722. eCollection 2022.
5
Validating Test Score Interpretations Using Time Information.利用时间信息验证考试分数解释
Front Psychol. 2019 May 28;10:1131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01131. eCollection 2019.
6
An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests.认知测试中反应时间与过程的模型概述
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 6;10:102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00102. eCollection 2019.
7
On the Importance of the Speed-Ability Trade-Off When Dealing With Not Reached Items.论处理未达项目时速度与能力权衡的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 13;9:964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00964. eCollection 2018.