Enderle-Ammour Kathrin, Bader Moritz, Ahrens Theresa Dorothee, Franke Kai, Timme Sylvia, Csanadi Agnes, Hoeppner Jens, Kulemann Birte, Maurer Jochen, Reiss Philip, Schilling Oliver, Keck Tobias, Brabletz Thomas, Stickeler Elmar, Werner Martin, Wellner Ulrich Friedrich, Bronsert Peter
1 Institute for Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
2 Department of Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tumour Biol. 2017 May;39(5):1010428317705501. doi: 10.1177/1010428317705501.
In cancer biology, the architectural concept "form follows function" is reflected by cell morphology, migration, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition protein pattern. In vivo, features of epithelial-mesenchymal transition have been associated with tumor budding, which correlates significantly with patient outcome. Hereby, the majority of tumor buds are not truly detached but still connected to a major tumor mass. For detailed insights into the different tumor bud types and the process of tumor budding, we quantified tumor cells according to histomorphological and immunohistological epithelial-mesenchymal transition characteristics. Three-dimensional reconstruction from adenocarcinomas (pancreatic, colorectal, lung, and ductal breast cancers) was performed as published. Tumor cell morphology and epithelial-mesenchymal transition characteristics (represented by zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 and E-Cadherin) were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively in a three-dimensional context. Tumor buds were classified into main tumor mass, connected tumor bud, and isolated tumor bud. Cell morphology and epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker expression were assessed for each tumor cell. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition characteristics between isolated tumor bud and connected tumor bud demonstrated no significant differences or trends. Tumor cell count correlated significantly with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and histomorphological characteristics. Regression curve analysis revealed initially a loss of membranous E-Cadherin, followed by expression of cytoplasmic E-Cadherin and subsequent expression of nuclear zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1. Morphologic changes followed later in this sequence. Our data demonstrate that connected and isolated tumor buds are equal concerning immunohistochemical epithelial-mesenchymal transition characteristics and histomorphology. Our data also give an insight in the process of tumor budding. While there is a notion that the epithelial-mesenchymal transition zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1-E-Cadherin cascade is initiated by zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1, our results are contrary and outline other possible pathways influencing the regulation of E-Cadherin.
在癌症生物学中,“形式追随功能”这一建筑学概念通过细胞形态、迁移以及上皮-间质转化蛋白模式得以体现。在体内,上皮-间质转化的特征与肿瘤芽生相关,而肿瘤芽生与患者预后显著相关。在此,大多数肿瘤芽并非真正分离,而是仍与主要肿瘤块相连。为了深入了解不同类型的肿瘤芽以及肿瘤芽生过程,我们根据组织形态学和免疫组织化学上皮-间质转化特征对肿瘤细胞进行了量化。按照已发表的方法对腺癌(胰腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌和乳腺导管癌)进行三维重建。在三维环境中对肿瘤细胞形态和上皮-间质转化特征(以锌指E盒结合同源框1和E-钙黏蛋白表示)进行了定性和定量分析。肿瘤芽被分为主要肿瘤块、相连肿瘤芽和孤立肿瘤芽。对每个肿瘤细胞的细胞形态和上皮-间质转化标志物表达进行了评估。孤立肿瘤芽和相连肿瘤芽之间的上皮-间质转化特征未显示出显著差异或趋势。肿瘤细胞计数与上皮-间质转化及组织形态学特征显著相关。回归曲线分析最初显示膜性E-钙黏蛋白缺失,随后是细胞质E-钙黏蛋白表达,接着是核锌指E盒结合同源框1表达。形态学变化在此序列中稍后出现。我们的数据表明,在免疫组织化学上皮-间质转化特征和组织形态学方面,相连肿瘤芽和孤立肿瘤芽是等同的。我们的数据还揭示了肿瘤芽生过程。虽然有一种观点认为上皮-间质转化锌指E盒结合同源框1-E-钙黏蛋白级联反应由锌指E盒结合同源框1启动,但我们的结果与之相反,并概述了影响E-钙黏蛋白调节的其他可能途径。