Kocsmár Éva, Lotz Gábor, Kiss András, Hoerner Markus, Petrova Ekaterina, Freudenberg Nikolaus, Csanádi Ágnes, Kulemann Birte, Werner Martin, Bronsert Peter, Wellner Ulrich Friedrich
2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
J Cancer. 2020 Sep 17;11(22):6474-6483. doi: 10.7150/jca.46093. eCollection 2020.
The presence of invasive cell clusters known as tumor budding and the closely related epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) have a prognostic impact on cancer patients' overall survival. Interestingly, data quantitatively analyzing and correlating the amount of tumor buds and patient overall survival as well as the impact of expression of epithelial phenotype markers are missing. Periampullary carcinoma samples of 171 patients were immunohistochemically stained for E-Cadherin (ECad). Tumor cell clusters (TCC, defined from one to 50 cells) were manually quantified comprising tumor cell number and subcellular localization of ECad expression (membranous, cytoplasmic or mixed). Data analyses were performed using elastic net feature selection. Hereby, five distinct intervals of TCC sizes and corresponding fractions of cells with distinct ECad expression were identified. Prognostic features of the defined budding categories were entered into a subsequent Cox regression model together with standard clinicopathological parameters and, based on the model prediction, cases were categorized into "low and high budding" grades. Overall median TCC size was 16 cells (range: 2-36 cells). The median number of TCCs per tumor was 42 (range: 3-283). Elastic net feature selection identified TCCs of 6-10 and 31-35 cells as prognostically most relevant negative and positive features, respectively. Regarding ECad expression, cytoplasmic ECad expression in TCCs of 11-15 as well as of 26-30 cells revealed prognostic relevance. Combining TCC numbers and ECad expression, budding grade qualified as independent prognostic factor for patient overall survival (0.001) in a multivariable clinicopathologic Cox model. Applying an advanced modelling by machine learning on a cohort of periampullary cancers, we show that not the smallest TCCs (1-5 cells) but tumor cell nests containing 6-10 cells display the strongest negative prognostic relevance. Moreover, we demonstrate that larger TCCs might have a strong positive prognostic impact in periampullary adenocarcinomas, contributing to establishing an advanced grading system.
被称为肿瘤芽生的侵袭性细胞簇以及与之密切相关的上皮间质转化(EMT)的存在对癌症患者的总生存期具有预后影响。有趣的是,目前缺乏定量分析肿瘤芽数量与患者总生存期之间的关系以及上皮表型标志物表达影响的数据。对171例壶腹周围癌患者的样本进行E-钙黏蛋白(ECad)免疫组化染色。手动定量肿瘤细胞簇(TCC,定义为1至50个细胞),包括肿瘤细胞数量和ECad表达的亚细胞定位(膜性、细胞质或混合性)。使用弹性网络特征选择进行数据分析。据此,确定了五个不同的TCC大小区间以及具有不同ECad表达的相应细胞比例。将定义的芽生类别的预后特征与标准临床病理参数一起纳入后续的Cox回归模型,并根据模型预测将病例分为“低芽生和高芽生”等级。TCC的总体中位数大小为16个细胞(范围:2 - 36个细胞)。每个肿瘤的TCC中位数数量为42个(范围:3 - 283个)。弹性网络特征选择确定6 - 10个细胞和31 - 35个细胞的TCC分别为预后最相关的负性和正性特征。关于ECad表达,11 - 15个细胞以及26 - 30个细胞的TCC中的细胞质ECad表达显示出预后相关性。在多变量临床病理Cox模型中,结合TCC数量和ECad表达,芽生等级被证明是患者总生存期的独立预后因素(0.001)。通过对一组壶腹周围癌应用机器学习的先进建模方法,我们发现并非最小的TCC(1 - 5个细胞),而是包含6 - 10个细胞的肿瘤细胞巢显示出最强的负性预后相关性。此外,我们证明较大的TCC可能对壶腹周围腺癌具有强烈的正性预后影响,这有助于建立一个先进的分级系统。
Anticancer Res. 2015-11
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024-4
Clin Pathol. 2024-3-13
Cancers (Basel). 2022-9-28
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022-7-11
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019-7-11
Am J Pathol. 2019-6-11
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018-7-11
Br J Cancer. 2018-5-14
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017-11-20