a Clinical Pharmacology Program , Office of the Clinical Director, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , MD , USA.
b Molecular Pharmacology Section , Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda , MD , USA.
Cancer Biol Ther. 2017 Jul 3;18(7):470-472. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2017.1323600. Epub 2017 May 5.
A lack of appropriate diagnostic tools for prostate cancer has led to overdiagnosis and over treatment. In a recent publication in the New England Journal of Medicine, Hamdy et al showed no difference in the outcomes of patients that had undergone either radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or active monitoring. In an effort to enhance clinical stratification, the development of improved, more accurate diagnostic tools is actively being pursued. Herein, we explore recent advances in prostate cancer screening, including biomarker assays, genetic testing, and specialized fields, such as mathematical oncology. These newly developed, highly sensitive diagnostic assays may potentially aid clinicians in selecting appropriate therapies for patients in the very near future.
前列腺癌缺乏适当的诊断工具导致了过度诊断和过度治疗。在最近发表在《新英格兰医学杂志》上的一篇文章中,Hamdy 等人表明,接受根治性前列腺切除术、放疗或主动监测的患者的结局没有差异。为了加强临床分层,正在积极开发改进的、更准确的诊断工具。在此,我们探讨了前列腺癌筛查的最新进展,包括生物标志物检测、基因检测以及数学肿瘤学等专业领域。这些新开发的、高灵敏度的诊断检测方法可能有助于临床医生在不久的将来为患者选择合适的治疗方法。