Steele C Brooke, Li Jun, Huang Bin, Weir Hannah K
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Markey Cancer Center, Kentucky Cancer Registry, and College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123 Suppl 24(Suppl 24):5160-5177. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31026.
The 5-year relative survival for prostate cancers diagnosed between 1990 and 1994 in the United States was very high (92%); however, survival in black males was 7% lower compared with white males. The authors updated these findings and examined survival by stage and race.
The authors used data from the CONCORD-2 study for males (ages 15-99 years) who were diagnosed with prostate cancer in 37 states, covering 80% of the US population. Survival was adjusted for background mortality (net survival) using state-specific and race-specific life tables and was age-standardized. Data were presented for 2001 through 2003 and 2004 through 2009 to account for changes in collecting SEER Summary Stage 2000.
Among the 1,527,602 prostate cancers diagnosed between 2001 and 2009, the proportion of localized cases increased from 73% to 77% in black males and from 77% to 79% in white males. Although the proportion of distant-stage cases was higher among black males than among white males, they represented less than 6% of cases in both groups between 2004 and 2009. Net survival exceeded 99% for localized stage between 2004 and 2009 in both racial groups. Overall, and in most states, 5-year net survival exceeded 95%.
Prostate cancer survival has increased since the first CONCORD study, and the racial gap has narrowed. Earlier detection of localized cancers likely contributed to this finding. However, racial disparities also were observed in overall survival. To help understand which factors might contribute to the persistence of this disparity, states could use local data to explore sociodemographic characteristics, such as survivors' health insurance status, health literacy, treatment decision-making processes, and treatment preferences. Cancer 2017;123:5160-77. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
1990年至1994年在美国诊断出的前列腺癌患者的5年相对生存率非常高(92%);然而,黑人男性的生存率比白人男性低7%。作者更新了这些研究结果,并按分期和种族对生存率进行了研究。
作者使用了CONCORD-2研究的数据,该研究针对37个州(覆盖美国80%人口)中15至99岁被诊断为前列腺癌的男性。使用特定州和特定种族的生命表对背景死亡率(净生存率)进行调整,并进行年龄标准化。数据呈现了2001年至2003年以及2004年至2009年的情况,以说明2000年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)总结分期收集方面的变化。
在2001年至2009年诊断出的1,527,602例前列腺癌中,黑人男性局限性病例的比例从73%增至77%,白人男性从77%增至79%。尽管黑人男性远处转移期病例的比例高于白人男性,但在2004年至2009年期间,两组中此类病例均不到6%。在2004年至2009年期间,两个种族局限性分期的净生存率均超过99%。总体而言,在大多数州,5年净生存率超过95%。
自首次CONCORD研究以来,前列腺癌患者的生存率有所提高,种族差距也有所缩小。局限性癌症的早期检测可能促成了这一结果。然而,在总生存率方面也观察到了种族差异。为了帮助了解哪些因素可能导致这种差异持续存在,各州可以利用当地数据来探索社会人口学特征,如幸存者的健康保险状况、健康素养、治疗决策过程和治疗偏好。《癌症》2017年;123:5160 - 77。2017年发表。本文为美国政府作品,在美国属于公共领域。