Chase Liana, Sapkota Ram P
SOAS, University of London.
McGill University.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;54(3):400-422. doi: 10.1177/1363461517703023. Epub 2017 May 5.
The recent rise in suicide among Bhutanese refugees has been linked to the erosion of social networks and community supports in the ongoing resettlement process. This paper presents ethnographic findings on the role of informal care practiced by relatives, friends, and neighbors in the prevention and alleviation of mental distress in two Bhutanese refugee communities: the refugee camps of eastern Nepal and the resettled community of Burlington, Vermont, US. Data gathered through interviews ( n = 40, camp community; n = 22, resettled community), focus groups (four, camp community), and participant observation (both sites) suggest that family members, friends, and neighbors were intimately involved in the recognition and management of individual distress, often responding proactively to perceived vulnerability rather than reactively to help-seeking. They engaged practices of care that attended to the root causes of distress, including pragmatic, social, and spiritual interventions, alongside those which targeted feelings in the "heart-mind" and behavior. In line with other studies, we found that the possibilities for care in this domain had been substantially constrained by resettlement. Initiatives that create opportunities for strengthening or extending social networks or provide direct support in meeting perceived needs may represent fruitful starting points for suicide prevention and mental health promotion in this population. We close by offering some reflections on how to better understand and account for informal care systems in the growing area of research concerned with identifying and addressing disparities in mental health resources across diverse contexts.
不丹难民自杀率最近的上升与安置过程中社会网络和社区支持的削弱有关。本文呈现了关于亲属、朋友和邻居提供的非正式照料在预防和缓解两个不丹难民社区心理困扰方面所起作用的人种志研究结果,这两个社区分别是尼泊尔东部的难民营以及美国佛蒙特州伯灵顿的安置社区。通过访谈(难民营社区40人,安置社区22人)、焦点小组(难民营社区4个)和参与观察(两个地点)收集的数据表明,家庭成员、朋友和邻居密切参与到个体困扰的识别和处理中,他们常常主动应对察觉到的脆弱性,而非被动回应求助行为。他们采取的照料措施关注困扰的根源,包括务实、社会和精神层面的干预,以及针对“内心”感受和行为的干预。与其他研究一致,我们发现这一领域的照料可能性因安置而受到极大限制。为加强或扩展社会网络创造机会,或在满足感知到的需求方面提供直接支持的举措,可能是预防该人群自杀和促进其心理健康的有效起点。最后,我们对如何在日益增长的研究领域中更好地理解和考量非正式照料系统进行了一些思考,该领域关注识别和解决不同背景下心理健康资源的差异。