• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Engaging culture and context in mhGAP implementation: fostering reflexive deliberation in practice.在 mhGAP 实施中关注文化和背景:促进实践中的反思性思考。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002689.
2
Considering culture, context and community in mhGAP implementation and training: challenges and recommendations from the field.在精神、神经和物质使用障碍干预指导项目的实施与培训中考虑文化、背景和社区:来自实地的挑战与建议
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Aug 24;13:58. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0312-9. eCollection 2019.
3
WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG): the first pre-service training study.世界卫生组织精神卫生差距行动规划干预指南(mhGAP-IG):首次职前培训研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Jun 29;14:47. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00379-2. eCollection 2020.
4
WHO Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) Intervention Guide: a systematic review of evidence from low and middle-income countries.世界卫生组织心理健康差距行动规划(mhGAP)干预指南:来自中低收入国家的证据系统评价。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Feb;21(1):30-34. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102750. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
5
WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact.世界卫生组织精神卫生差距行动规划(mhGAP)干预指南:关于证据和影响的最新系统评价
Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 Apr 26;24(3):124-30. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300254.
6
A step-wise community engagement and capacity building model prior to implementation of mhGAP-IG in a low- and middle-income country: a case study of Makueni County, Kenya.在低收入和中等收入国家实施精神、神经和物质使用障碍全球行动规划干预指南之前的逐步社区参与和能力建设模式:肯尼亚马库埃尼县的案例研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Oct 15;12:57. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0234-y. eCollection 2018.
7
Building system capacity for the integration of mental health at the level of primary care in Tunisia: a study protocol in global mental health.构建突尼斯初级保健层面心理健康整合的系统能力:一项全球心理健康研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 17;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-1992-y.
8
"We find what we look for, and we look for what we know": factors interacting with a mental health training program to influence its expected outcomes in Tunisia.“我们寻找我们所寻找的,我们寻找我们所知道的”:在突尼斯,影响心理健康培训计划预期结果的相互作用因素。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):1398. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6261-4.
9
Implementation and use of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG): A review of the grey literature.《心理健康差距行动规划干预指南(mhGAP-IG)的实施和使用:灰色文献回顾》。
J Glob Health. 2021 Apr 17;11:04022. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04022.
10
Implementation of the mental health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) within the Fijian Healthcare System: a mixed-methods evaluation.斐济医疗系统中心理健康差距行动项目(mhGAP)的实施:一项混合方法评估
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Jun 20;13:43. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0301-z. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Contextualization and adaptation of the child and adolescent mental and behavioural disorders module of the mhGAP-IG in Kilifi and Nairobi counties in Kenya.肯尼亚基利菲县和内罗毕县对精神、神经和物质使用障碍干预指导手册(mhGAP-IG)中儿童和青少年心理及行为障碍模块进行情境化和调整
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Aug 7;12:e92. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10049. eCollection 2025.
2
Characterizing modifications to the mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide during implementation in low- and middle-income countries using the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions: a systematic review of reviews.使用循证干预措施的改编和修改报告框架,描述低收入和中等收入国家在实施心理健康差距行动方案(mhGAP)干预指南期间所做的修改:一项综述的系统评价
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2025 Jul 2;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13033-025-00671-z.
3
Implementation of the Community Component of the Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP): A Scoping Review.《精神卫生差距行动规划(mhGAP)社区部分的实施:一项范围综述》
Public Health Rev. 2025 Feb 25;46:1607759. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2025.1607759. eCollection 2025.
4
A response to criticism of the global mental health movement. How polarization can be overcome in theory and in west African social psychiatric practice.对全球心理健康运动批评的回应。论如何在理论及西非社会精神病学实践中克服两极分化。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Jan 13;11:e135. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.120. eCollection 2024.
5
Transforming global health: decoloniality and the human condition.转变全球健康:去殖民化与人类状况。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Aug 16;9(8):e015420. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015420.
6
Scale-up of Global Child and Youth Mental Health Services: A Scoping Review.全球儿童和青少年心理健康服务的扩大规模:范围综述。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 Nov;51(6):935-969. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01400-3. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
7
Factors influencing integration of mental health screening and treatment at HIV clinic settings in Cameroon: a qualitative study of health providers' perspectives.喀麦隆艾滋病毒诊所环境中影响心理健康筛查与治疗整合的因素:一项关于医疗服务提供者观点的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10775-w.
8
Depression and Global Mental Health in the Global South: A Critical Analysis of Policy and Discourse.《全球南方的抑郁与全球精神卫生:政策与话语的批判性分析》
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2024 Apr;54(2):95-107. doi: 10.1177/27551938231220230. Epub 2023 Dec 17.
9
[Gaps in primary mental health care in Chocó, Colombia: barriers and challengesLacunas na atenção primária à saúde mental em Chocó, Colômbia: barreiras e desafios].[哥伦比亚乔科省初级心理健康护理的差距:障碍与挑战 哥伦比亚乔科省初级心理健康护理的空白:障碍与挑战]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023 Oct 24;47:e138. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.138. eCollection 2023.
10
Lived Experiences of Mental Health Recovery in Persons of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Backgrounds within the Australian Context.澳大利亚背景下具有文化和语言多样性(CALD)背景的人群心理健康康复的生活经历
J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health. 2022 Dec 5:1-26. doi: 10.1007/s40737-022-00319-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Mental Health: Interdisciplinary challenges for a field in motion.全球精神卫生:一个不断发展的领域面临的跨学科挑战。
Transcult Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;57(1):3-18. doi: 10.1177/1363461519898035.
2
The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health.外来审视:全球卫生学术领域的作者身份
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Oct 18;4(5):e002068. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002068. eCollection 2019.
3
A critical assessment of the ideological underpinnings of current practice in global health and their historical origins.对当前全球卫生实践的思想基础及其历史渊源的批判性评估。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1651017. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1651017.
4
Global Mental Health and Idioms of Distress: The Paradox of Culture-Sensitive Pathologization of Distress in Cambodia.全球心理健康与痛苦成语:柬埔寨文化敏感型痛苦病理化的悖论。
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;43(2):211-235. doi: 10.1007/s11013-018-9612-9.
5
Understanding barriers to health care access through cultural safety and ethical space: Indigenous people's experiences in Prince George, Canada.通过文化安全和伦理空间理解获得医疗保健的障碍:加拿大乔治王子城的原住民的经历。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;218:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
6
The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development.柳叶刀全球精神卫生与可持续发展委员会
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1553-1598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31612-X. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution.可持续发展目标时代的高质量卫生系统:是时候进行一场变革了。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Patterns of concordances in mhGAP-IG screening and DSM-IV/ICD10 diagnoses by trained community service providers in Kenya: a pilot cross-sectional study.肯尼亚经培训的社区服务提供者进行 mhGAP-IG 筛查和 DSM-IV/ICD10 诊断的一致性模式:一项试点横断面研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Nov;53(11):1277-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1567-1. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
9
Key features of palliative care service delivery to Indigenous peoples in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States: a comprehensive review.澳大利亚、新西兰、加拿大和美国的姑息治疗服务提供给原住民的主要特点:全面综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 May 8;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0325-1.
10
Treatment gap for anxiety disorders is global: Results of the World Mental Health Surveys in 21 countries.焦虑障碍治疗差距是全球性的:21 个国家的世界心理健康调查结果。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Mar;35(3):195-208. doi: 10.1002/da.22711. Epub 2018 Jan 22.

在 mhGAP 实施中关注文化和背景:促进实践中的反思性思考。

Engaging culture and context in mhGAP implementation: fostering reflexive deliberation in practice.

机构信息

Division of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Culture Mind and Brain Program and Global Mental Health Program, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002689.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002689
PMID:32967978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7513569/
Abstract

In 2002, WHO launched the Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) as a strategy to help member states scale up services to address the growing burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders globally, especially in countries with limited resources. Since then, the mhGAP program has been widely implemented but also criticised for insufficient attention to cultural and social context and ethical issues. To address this issue and help overcome related barriers to scale-up, we outline a framework of questions exploring key cultural and ethical dimensions of mhGAP planning, adaptation, training, and implementation. This framework is meant to guide mhGAP activity taking place around the world. Our approach is informed by recent research on cultural formulation and adaptation, and aligned with key components of the WHO implementation research guide (Peters, D. H., Tran, N. T., & Adam, T. (2013). Implementation research in health: a practical guide. ). The framework covers three broad domains: (1) -how to examine cultural norms, knowledge, values and attitudes in relation to the "culture of the mhGAP"; (2) -identifying formal and informal systems of care in the cultural context of practice.; and (3) : examining issues related to power dynamics, communication, and decision-making. Systematic consideration of these issues can guide integration of cultural knowledge, structural competence, and ethics in implementation efforts.

摘要

2002 年,世卫组织启动了心理健康差距行动规划(mhGAP),作为帮助会员国扩大服务范围以应对全球范围内不断增加的精神、神经和药物使用障碍负担的一项战略,特别是在资源有限的国家。自那时以来,mhGAP 规划得到了广泛实施,但也因对文化和社会背景以及伦理问题关注不够而受到批评。为了解决这一问题并帮助克服扩大规模的相关障碍,我们概述了一个框架,探讨了 mhGAP 规划、调整、培训和实施的关键文化和伦理维度。这个框架旨在指导世界各地的 mhGAP 活动。我们的方法是受最近关于文化制定和调整的研究的启发,并与世卫组织实施研究指南的关键组成部分(Peters,D.H.,Tran,N.T.,& Adam,T.(2013)。健康实施研究:实用指南。)相一致。该框架涵盖三个广泛的领域:(1)如何审查与“mhGAP 文化”相关的文化规范、知识、价值观和态度;(2)在实践的文化背景下确定正式和非正式的护理系统;(3):审查与权力动态、沟通和决策相关的问题。系统地考虑这些问题可以指导在实施工作中整合文化知识、结构能力和伦理。