Donnachie Craig, Wyke Sally, Mutrie Nanette, Hunt Kate
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 200 Renfield Street, Glasgow, G2 3QB, UK.
School of Social and Political Sciences, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 25-29 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RS, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 May 5;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0505-z.
Self-monitoring using pedometers is an effective behaviour change technique to support increased physical activity (PA). However, the ways in which pedometers operate as motivational tools in adoption and maintenance of PA is not well understood. This paper investigates men's experiences of pedometers as motivational tools both during and after their participation in a 12-week group-based, weight management programme for overweight/obese men, Football Fans in Training (FFIT).
Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 28 men, purposively sampled to include men who did and did not achieve 5% weight loss during the programme. Data were analysed thematically utilising the framework approach, using Self-Determination Theory (SDT) - namely concepts of behavioural regulation and the basic needs of relatedness, competence and autonomy - as an analytical lens.
During the programme, FFIT's context and fellow participants supported relatedness and encouraged use of the pedometer. The pedometer was seen to provide tangible proof of progress, thus increasing competence for change, whilst the ability to monitor one's own progress and take remedial action supported autonomy; these men portrayed the pedometer as an 'ally'. However, a minority found the pedometer 'dispiriting' or controlling when it evidenced their inability to meet their PA targets. After the programme, some men no longer used the device as they had fully internalised their motivations for increased PA. In contrast, others continued to use pedometers or progressed to other self-monitoring technologies because it was enjoyable and facilitated maintenance of their increased PA. However, the minority of men who experienced the pedometer as controlling no longer used it. They were less successful in achieving 5% weight loss and appeared reliant on external factors, including support from coach and group members, to maintain motivation.
These findings show how self-monitoring using pedometers and associated goal setting supported the development of autonomous motivation for PA, during and after participation in a group-based programme. They also suggest that programmes could focus on early identification of participants who remain motivated by extrinsic factors or express negative experiences of self-monitoring tools, to offer greater support to identify the benefits of PA based on a person's own values.
使用计步器进行自我监测是一种有效的行为改变技术,有助于增加身体活动(PA)。然而,计步器作为激励工具在促进和维持身体活动方面的作用方式尚未得到充分理解。本文调查了男性在参加为期12周的针对超重/肥胖男性的基于小组的体重管理计划“训练中的球迷”(FFIT)期间及之后,将计步器作为激励工具的体验。
对28名男性进行了半结构化电话访谈,目的抽样包括在该计划期间体重减轻5%和未减轻5%的男性。利用框架方法对数据进行主题分析,以自我决定理论(SDT)——即行为调节概念以及关联性、能力和自主性的基本需求——作为分析视角。
在该计划期间,FFIT的环境和其他参与者支持关联性,并鼓励使用计步器。计步器被视为提供了进步的切实证据,从而增强了改变的能力,而监测自己进步并采取补救行动的能力则支持了自主性;这些男性将计步器描绘为“盟友”。然而,少数人发现当计步器显示他们无法达到身体活动目标时,它“令人沮丧”或具有控制性。计划结束后,一些男性不再使用该设备,因为他们已经完全内化了增加身体活动的动机。相比之下,其他人继续使用计步器或升级到其他自我监测技术,因为这很有趣且有助于维持他们增加的身体活动。然而,少数将计步器视为具有控制性的男性不再使用它。他们在实现体重减轻5%方面不太成功,并且似乎依赖外部因素(包括教练和小组成员的支持)来维持动力。
这些发现表明,在参加基于小组的计划期间及之后,使用计步器进行自我监测和相关目标设定如何支持身体活动自主动机的发展。它们还表明,计划可以专注于早期识别那些仍然受外在因素激励或对自我监测工具表达负面体验的参与者,以便提供更多支持,根据个人自身价值观确定身体活动的益处。