Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验,比较两种从不同人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)来源获得促黄体生成素(LH)生物活性的HMG制剂的疗效和安全性。

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of two HMG preparations gaining their LH bioactivity from different HCG sources.

作者信息

Lockwood Gillian, Cometti Barbara, Bogstad Jeanette, Erb Karin, De Geyter Christian, Urbancsek Janos, Trevisan Silvia, Pocate-Cheriet Khaled, de Ziegler Dominique

机构信息

Midland Fertility, Tamworth House, Ventura Park Road, Tamworth B78 3HL, UK.

IBSA Institut Biochimique SA, Pambio-Noranco, Switzerland.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jul;35(1):17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

Abstract

In this prospective, controlled, randomized, multicentre, non-inferiority study, efficacy and safety of two HMG preparations (Menopur- Ferring and Meriofert®- IBSA Institut Biochimique SA) for ovarian stimulation were compared (270 women undergoing IVF aged between 18 and 39 years; BMI 30 kg/m or less; less than three prior completed assisted reproduction technique cycles). A standard long down-regulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocol, with HCG triggering was used; primary end-point was total number of oocytes retrieved; attention was paid toovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were reported for most of the clinically significant end-points, including embryo quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Total number of oocytes retrieved was higher in the new HMG group compared with the reference (11.6 ± 6.6 and 9.7 ± 5.9, respectively, with a 95% CI of the difference equal +0.43 to +3.43). Increased number of oocytes was obtained through a shorter stimulation, but HMG units per oocyte retrieved were equivalent. The safety profile of the products for frequency of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was the same. This study showed that the new HMG preparation is a viable alternative for conducting ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles.

摘要

在这项前瞻性、对照、随机、多中心、非劣效性研究中,比较了两种促性腺激素(Menopur - Ferring和Meriofert® - IBSA Institut Biochimique SA)用于卵巢刺激的疗效和安全性(270名年龄在18至39岁之间接受体外受精的女性;体重指数30kg/m或更低;既往完成辅助生殖技术周期少于三次)。采用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂标准长方案降调节,并使用人绒毛膜促性腺激素触发;主要终点是获卵总数;关注卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)。对于大多数临床重要终点,包括胚胎质量、受精率、着床率、持续妊娠率和活产率,治疗组之间未报告有统计学显著差异。新促性腺激素组的获卵总数高于对照组(分别为11.6±6.6和9.7±5.9,差异的95%置信区间为+0.43至+3.43)。通过较短的刺激获得了更多的卵子,但每个获卵的促性腺激素单位相当。两种产品在卵巢过度刺激综合征发生频率方面的安全性概况相同。这项研究表明,新的促性腺激素制剂是在体外受精周期中进行卵巢刺激的可行替代方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验