Pellesi L, Benemei S, Favoni V, Lupi C, Mampreso E, Negro A, Paolucci M, Steiner T J, Ulivi M, Cevoli S, Guerzoni S
Medical Toxicology - Headache Centre, Policlinic Hospital, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
J Headache Pain. 2017 Dec;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0762-x. Epub 2017 May 5.
Headache disorders are highly prevalent, and have a substantial and negative impact on health worldwide. They are largely treatable, but differences in structure, objectives, organization and delivery affect the quality of headache care. In order to recognize and remedy deficiencies in care, the Global Campaign against Headache, in collaboration with the European Headache Federation, recently developed a set of quality indicators for headache services. These require further assessment to demonstrate fitness for purpose. This is their first implementation to evaluate quality in headache care as a multicentre national study.
Between September and December 2016, we applied the quality indicators in six Italian specialist headache centres (Bologna, Firenze, Modena, Padova, Roma Campus Bio-Medico and Roma Sapienza). We used five previously developed assessment instruments, translated into Italian according to Lifting The Burden's translation protocol for hybrid documents. We took data from 360 consecutive patients (60 per centre) by questionnaire and from their medical records, and by different questionnaires from their health-care providers (HCPs), including physicians, nurses, psychologists and nursing assistants.
The findings, comparable between centres, confirmed the feasibility and practicability of using the quality indicators in Italian specialist headache centres. The questionnaires were easily understood by HCPs and patients, and were not unduly time-consuming. Diagnoses were almost all (> 97%) according to ICHD criteria, and routinely (100%) reviewed during follow-up. Diagnostic diaries were regularly used by 96% of physicians. Referral pathways from primary to specialist care existed in five of the six clinics, as did urgent referral pathways. Instruments to assess disability and quality of life were not used regularly, a deficiency that needs to be addressed.
This Italy-wide survey confirmed in six specialist centres that the headache service quality indicators are fit for purpose. By establishing majority practice, identifying commonalities and detecting deficits as a guide to quality improvement, the quality indicators may be used to set benchmarks for quality assessment. The next step is extend use and evaluation of the indicators into non-specialist care.
头痛疾病非常普遍,在全球范围内对健康有着重大的负面影响。它们大多是可治疗的,但在结构、目标、组织和服务提供方面的差异会影响头痛护理的质量。为了识别和纠正护理中的不足,全球抗击头痛运动与欧洲头痛联合会合作,最近制定了一套头痛服务质量指标。这些指标需要进一步评估以证明其适用性。这是它们首次作为一项多中心全国性研究用于评估头痛护理质量。
2016年9月至12月期间,我们在意大利的六个专科头痛中心(博洛尼亚、佛罗伦萨、摩德纳、帕多瓦、罗马生物医学大学校区和罗马第一大学)应用了这些质量指标。我们使用了五种先前开发的评估工具,并根据《减轻负担》中混合文档的翻译协议将其翻译成意大利语。我们通过问卷从360名连续就诊的患者(每个中心60名)及其病历中获取数据,并通过不同问卷从他们的医疗保健提供者(包括医生、护士、心理学家和护理助理)那里获取数据。
各中心之间的研究结果具有可比性,证实了在意大利专科头痛中心使用质量指标的可行性和实用性。问卷易于医疗保健提供者和患者理解,且不会占用过多时间。几乎所有(>97%)诊断均符合国际头痛疾病分类标准,且在随访期间进行了常规(100%)复查。96%的医生定期使用诊断日记。六个诊所中有五个存在从初级护理到专科护理的转诊途径,紧急转诊途径也存在。评估残疾和生活质量的工具未得到定期使用,这一缺陷需要解决。
这项全意大利范围的调查在六个专科中心证实,头痛服务质量指标是适用的。通过确立多数做法、识别共性并检测不足作为质量改进的指南,质量指标可用于设定质量评估的基准。下一步是将指标的使用和评估扩展到非专科护理。