• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与其他焦虑症相比,强迫症的安慰剂(和抗抑郁药)反应较低:一项荟萃分析。

Obsessive-compulsive disorder has a reduced placebo (and antidepressant) response compared to other anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sugarman Michael A, Kirsch Irving, Huppert Jonathan D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bedford Veterans Affairs Medical Center, United States.

Harvard Medical School, United States.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 15;218:217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.068. Epub 2017 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.068
PMID:28477500
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have indicated that obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) might have a reduced placebo response compared to other anxiety-related disorders including generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and social anxiety disorder. No previous analysis has directly compared antidepressant and placebo responses between OCD and these conditions.

METHOD

We analyzed pre-post change scores within drug and placebo groups as well as between-groups change scores (i.e., drug compared to placebo) for all FDA-approved antidepressants for the treatment of these five anxiety-related disorders. Antidepressants included duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine. Random effects meta-analysis was used to examine all trials submitted to the FDA, plus additional post-approval trials available from manufacturer-sponsored clinical trial registers. Clinician-rated symptom inventories were the outcome measures for all conditions to facilitate comparisons across diagnoses.

RESULTS

Fifty-six trials met inclusion criteria. OCD had significantly lower pre-post effect sizes (ps<0.003) for both placebo (Hedges' g=0.49) and antidepressants (g=0.84) compared to the other four conditions (gs between 0.70 and 1.10 for placebo and 1.11 and 1.40 for antidepressants). However, the drug-placebo effect sizes did not significantly differ across diagnoses (Q(4)=6.09, p=0.193, I =34.3% [95% CI: -7.0,59.7]), with gs between=0.26 and 0.39.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall pre-post change scores were smaller for OCD compared to other anxiety disorders for both antidepressants and placebo, although drug-placebo effects sizes did not significantly differ across disorders. Theoretical and clinical implications for the understanding and treatment of OCD are discussed.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,与其他焦虑相关障碍(包括广泛性焦虑症、恐慌症、创伤后应激障碍和社交焦虑症)相比,强迫症(OCD)的安慰剂反应可能较低。以前没有分析直接比较过强迫症与这些疾病之间的抗抑郁药和安慰剂反应。

方法

我们分析了药物组和安慰剂组内的治疗前后变化分数,以及所有美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗这五种焦虑相关障碍的抗抑郁药的组间变化分数(即药物与安慰剂相比)。抗抑郁药包括度洛西汀、艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林和文拉法辛。采用随机效应荟萃分析来检查提交给FDA的所有试验,以及制造商赞助的临床试验登记处提供的额外批准后试验。临床医生评定的症状量表是所有疾病的结局指标,以便于跨诊断进行比较。

结果

56项试验符合纳入标准。与其他四种疾病相比,强迫症在安慰剂(Hedges' g = 0.49)和抗抑郁药(g = 0.84)方面的治疗前后效应量显著较低(p<0.003)(安慰剂的g值在0.70至1.10之间,抗抑郁药的g值在1.11至1.40之间)。然而,不同诊断之间的药物-安慰剂效应量没有显著差异(Q(4)=6.09,p = 0.193,I = 34.3% [95% CI:-7.0,59.7]),g值在0.26至0.39之间。

结论

与其他焦虑症相比,强迫症在抗抑郁药和安慰剂方面的总体治疗前后变化分数较小,尽管不同疾病之间的药物-安慰剂效应量没有显著差异。讨论了对强迫症理解和治疗的理论及临床意义。

相似文献

1
Obsessive-compulsive disorder has a reduced placebo (and antidepressant) response compared to other anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis.与其他焦虑症相比,强迫症的安慰剂(和抗抑郁药)反应较低:一项荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 15;218:217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.068. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
2
Initial severity and antidepressant efficacy for anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder: An individual patient data meta-analysis.初始严重程度与焦虑障碍、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍的抗抑郁疗效:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Jun;35(6):515-522. doi: 10.1002/da.22737. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Comparative efficacy of antidepressants in preventing relapse in anxiety disorders - a meta-analysis.抗抑郁药预防焦虑障碍复发的疗效比较 - 一项荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Jun;123(1-3):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.021. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
4
D-Cycloserine Augmentation of Exposure-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data.D-环丝氨酸增强暴露为基础的认知行为疗法治疗焦虑、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍:一项个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):501-510. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3955.
5
Clinical response and risk for reported suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in pediatric antidepressant treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.儿科抗抑郁治疗中的临床反应以及报告的自杀意念和自杀未遂风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
JAMA. 2007 Apr 18;297(15):1683-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.15.1683.
6
Efficacy of drug treatment in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A meta-analytic review.药物治疗强迫症的疗效:一项荟萃分析综述
Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Apr;166(4):424-43. doi: 10.1192/bjp.166.4.424.
7
Fluvoxamine. An updated review of its use in the management of adults with anxiety disorders.氟伏沙明。关于其在成人焦虑症管理中应用的最新综述。
Drugs. 2000 Oct;60(4):925-54. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060040-00006.
8
Risk of relapse after antidepressant discontinuation in anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis of relapse prevention trials.焦虑症、强迫症和创伤后应激障碍患者停用抗抑郁药后的复发风险:预防复发试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2017 Sep 13;358:j3927. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3927.
9
10
Influence of baseline severity on antidepressant efficacy for anxiety disorders: meta-analysis and meta-regression.基线严重程度对焦虑障碍抗抑郁药疗效的影响:荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;208(6):515-21. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.173450. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized crossover trial with experience sampling to test placebo effects on pathological skin-picking.一项采用经验抽样法的随机交叉试验,以测试安慰剂对病理性皮肤搔抓的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04360-2.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of vortioxetine monotherapy in SSRI-resistant OCD: a retrospective multicenter study.伏硫西汀单药治疗对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)耐药的强迫症的疗效和耐受性:一项回顾性多中心研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 13;16:1617345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1617345. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparing Different Montages of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Treating Treatment-Resistant Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial.
比较经颅直流电刺激不同组合治疗难治性强迫症:一项随机、单盲临床试验
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 21;61(2):169. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020169.
4
Efficacy of Supratherapeutic Duloxetine Combined With Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Severe Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder With Comorbid Depression: A Case Report.超治疗剂量度洛西汀联合认知行为疗法治疗伴有共病抑郁的重度难治性强迫症的疗效:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Nov 26;16(11):e74541. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74541. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Responsive deep brain stimulation guided by ventral striatal electrophysiology of obsession durably ameliorates compulsion.受 obsessions 腹侧纹状体电生理学指导的响应式脑深部刺激可持久改善强迫症状。
Neuron. 2024 Jan 3;112(1):73-83.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.034. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
6
Placebo response in trials with patients with anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and stress disorders across the lifespan: a three-level meta-analysis.跨生命周期焦虑、强迫症和应激障碍患者试验中的安慰剂反应:三级荟萃分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Feb;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2022-300630.
7
Imaginary pills and open-label placebos can reduce test anxiety by means of placebo mechanisms.想象中的药丸和开放性安慰剂可以通过安慰剂机制减轻考试焦虑。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 14;13(1):2624. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29624-7.
8
Neuroticism and Conscientiousness Moderate the Effect of Oral Medication Beliefs on Adherence of People with Mental Illness during the Pandemic.神经质和尽责性调节了大流行期间口服药物信念对精神疾病患者服药依从性的影响。
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 29;12(10):1315. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101315.
9
The efficacy of brief strategic therapy in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder: a case series.简短策略治疗治疗强迫症的疗效:病例系列。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Sep 22;93(S1):e2022271. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93iS1.13064.
10
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress disorders: A 3-level network meta-analysis.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和 5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂治疗焦虑、强迫症和应激障碍:一个 3 级网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Jun 10;18(6):e1003664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003664. eCollection 2021 Jun.