• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sepsis 3 from the perspective of clinicians and quality improvement initiatives.

作者信息

Machado Flavia R, Nsutebu Emmanuel, AbDulaziz Salman, Daniels Ron, Finfer Simon, Kissoon Niranjan, Lander Harvey, Malik Imrana, Papathanassoglou Elizabeth, Reinhart Konrad, Rooney Kevin, Rüddel Hendrik, Toccafondi Giulio, Tulli GiOrgio, Hamilton Vida

机构信息

Global Sepsis Alliance Executive Committee, Paul-Schneider-Str. 2, 07747 Jena, Germany; Global Sepsis Alliance Quality Improvement Committee, Paul-Schneider-Str. 2, 07747 Jena, Germany.

Global Sepsis Alliance Quality Improvement Committee, Paul-Schneider-Str. 2, 07747 Jena, Germany.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:315-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.037. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.037
PMID:28478045
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Sepsis 3 from the perspective of clinicians and quality improvement initiatives.从临床医生和质量改进举措的角度看脓毒症3。
J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:315-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.037. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
2
Service improvement. The exemplar hospital.服务改进。典范医院。
Health Serv J. 2014 May 30;124(6400):suppl 6-7.
3
Quality improvement strategies for critical care nursing.
Am J Crit Care. 2015 Jan;24(1):87-92. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015104.
4
Teaching laboratory management and quality assurance/quality improvement skills in a cytopathology fellowship program.在细胞病理学 fellowship 项目中教授实验室管理及质量保证/质量改进技能。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Sep;125(9):667-668. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21881. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
5
Why quality matters.
J Perinatol. 2015 May;35(5):311-2. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.16.
6
[The role of benchmarking seen from the perspective of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA)].[从联邦联合委员会（G-BA）的角度看基准化的作用]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):408-11. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.009.
7
[Case example: peer review in a stroke center].[案例示例：卒中中心的同行评审]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(8):579-80. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
8
Measuring and assuring quality performance in cytology: A toolkit.细胞学质量性能的测量与保证：工具包
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Jun;125(S6):502-507. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21831.
9
Reducing the quality gap in mental health services.缩小心理健康服务中的质量差距。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;53(10):941-942. doi: 10.1177/0004867419877688.
10
Systems and spread.系统与传播。
Qual Prim Care. 2014;22(1):7-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis Prediction Models are Trained on Labels that Diverge from Clinician-Recommended Treatment Times.脓毒症预测模型是基于与临床医生推荐的治疗时间不一致的标签进行训练的。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1215-1224. eCollection 2024.
2
Developing Augmented Pro-SOFA and Pro-SAPS Models by Integrating Biomarkers PCT, NLR, and CRP with SOFA and SAPS-III Scores.通过整合生物标志物降钙素原（PCT）、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值（NLR）和C反应蛋白（CRP）与序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）及简化急性生理学评分III（SAPS-III）来开发增强型SOFA和SAPS模型。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct;28(10):935-941. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24807. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
International Consensus Criteria for Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock.
国际儿童脓毒症和脓毒性休克共识标准。
JAMA. 2024 Feb 27;331(8):665-674. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0179.
4
Performance of bedside tools for predicting infection-related mortality and administrative data for sepsis surveillance: An observational cohort study.床边工具预测感染相关死亡率的性能和脓毒症监测的行政数据：一项观察性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 2;18(3):e0280228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280228. eCollection 2023.
5
Queensland Pediatric Sepsis Breakthrough Collaborative: Multicenter Observational Study to Evaluate the Implementation of a Pediatric Sepsis Pathway Within the Emergency Department.昆士兰儿科脓毒症突破协作组：一项多中心观察性研究，旨在评估急诊科内儿科脓毒症诊疗路径的实施情况。
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Nov 8;3(11):e0573. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000573. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Challenges and Solutions in translating sepsis guidelines into practice in resource-limited settings.在资源有限的环境中将脓毒症指南转化为实际应用中的挑战与解决方案。
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2646-2665. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-310.
7
[Critical statement on selected recommendations of the new German S3 Sepsis Guideline].[关于德国新S3脓毒症指南部分推荐意见的批判性声明]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020 Sep;115(6):505-507. doi: 10.1007/s00063-020-00720-0.
8
Predictive Accuracy of the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in Brazil. A Prospective Multicenter Study.巴西快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估评分的预测准确性：一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):789-798. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC.
9
Association of the Quick Sequential (Sepsis-Related) Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) Score With Excess Hospital Mortality in Adults With Suspected Infection in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.快速序贯器官衰竭评估（qSOFA）评分与中低收入国家疑似感染成人医院过度死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2202-2211. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6229.
10
Economic disparities and survival from critical illness.经济差异与危重病生存情况
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Aug;5(8):601-603. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30237-0. Epub 2017 Jun 15.