• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

昆士兰儿科脓毒症突破协作组:一项多中心观察性研究,旨在评估急诊科内儿科脓毒症诊疗路径的实施情况。

Queensland Pediatric Sepsis Breakthrough Collaborative: Multicenter Observational Study to Evaluate the Implementation of a Pediatric Sepsis Pathway Within the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Harley Amanda, Lister Paula, Gilholm Patricia, Rice Michael, Venkatesh Bala, Johnston Amy N B, Massey Debbie, Irwin Adam, Gibbons Kristen, Schlapbach Luregn J

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2021 Nov 8;3(11):e0573. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000573. eCollection 2021 Nov.

DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000000573
PMID:34765981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8577679/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the implementation of a pediatric sepsis pathway in the emergency department as part of a statewide quality improvement initiative in Queensland, Australia.

DESIGN

Multicenter observational prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Twelve emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.

PATIENTS

Children less than 18 years evaluated for sepsis in the emergency department. Patients with signs of shock, nonshocked patients with signs of organ dysfunction, and patients without organ dysfunction were assessed.

INTERVENTIONS

Introduction of a pediatric sepsis pathway.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Process measures included compliance with and timeliness of the sepsis bundle, and bundle components. Process and outcome measures of children admitted to the ICU with sepsis were compared with a baseline cohort. Five-hundred twenty-three children were treated for sepsis including 291 with suspected sepsis without organ dysfunction, 86 with sepsis-associated organ dysfunction, and 146 with septic shock. Twenty-four (5%) were admitted to ICU, and three (1%) died. The median time from sepsis recognition to bundle commencement for children with septic shock was 56 minutes (interquartile range, 36-99 min) and 47 minutes (interquartile range, 34-76 min) for children with sepsis-associated organ dysfunction without shock; 30% ( = 44) and 40% ( = 34), respectively, received the bundle within the target timeframe. In comparison with the baseline ICU cohort, bundle compliance improved from 27% ( = 45) to 58% ( = 14) within 60 minutes of recognition and from 47% ( = 78/167) to 75% ( = 18) within 180 minutes of recognition ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings on the introduction of protocolized care in a large and diverse state demonstrate ongoing variability in sepsis bundle compliance. Although bundle compliance improved compared with a baseline cohort, continued efforts are required to ensure guideline targets and sustainability are achieved.

摘要

目的

作为澳大利亚昆士兰州一项全州范围质量改进计划的一部分,评估急诊科小儿脓毒症诊疗路径的实施情况。

设计

多中心观察性前瞻性队列研究。

地点

澳大利亚昆士兰州的12个急诊科。

患者

在急诊科接受脓毒症评估的18岁以下儿童。对有休克体征的患者、无休克但有器官功能障碍体征的患者以及无器官功能障碍的患者进行评估。

干预措施

引入小儿脓毒症诊疗路径。

测量指标及主要结果

过程指标包括脓毒症集束治疗的依从性和及时性以及集束治疗的组成部分。将脓毒症患儿入住重症监护病房(ICU)的过程指标和结局指标与一个基线队列进行比较。523名儿童接受了脓毒症治疗,其中291名疑似脓毒症但无器官功能障碍,86名患有脓毒症相关器官功能障碍,146名患有感染性休克。24名(5%)入住ICU,3名(1%)死亡。感染性休克患儿从脓毒症识别到开始集束治疗的中位时间为56分钟(四分位间距,36 - 99分钟),无休克的脓毒症相关器官功能障碍患儿为47分钟(四分位间距,34 - 76分钟);分别有30%(n = 44)和40%(n = 34)在目标时间范围内接受了集束治疗。与基线ICU队列相比,识别后60分钟内集束治疗的依从性从27%(n = 45)提高到58%(n = 14),识别后180分钟内从47%(n = 78/167)提高到75%(n = 18)(P < 0.05)。

结论

我们在一个规模大且多样化的州引入规范化治疗的研究结果表明,脓毒症集束治疗的依从性仍存在差异。尽管与基线队列相比集束治疗的依从性有所提高,但仍需持续努力以确保达到指南目标并实现可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a463/8577679/d72179ac9a80/cc9-3-e0573-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a463/8577679/d72179ac9a80/cc9-3-e0573-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a463/8577679/d72179ac9a80/cc9-3-e0573-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Queensland Pediatric Sepsis Breakthrough Collaborative: Multicenter Observational Study to Evaluate the Implementation of a Pediatric Sepsis Pathway Within the Emergency Department.昆士兰儿科脓毒症突破协作组:一项多中心观察性研究,旨在评估急诊科内儿科脓毒症诊疗路径的实施情况。
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Nov 8;3(11):e0573. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000573. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
3
Treatment of Pediatric Septic Shock With the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines and PICU Patient Outcomes.采用脓毒症存活策略指南治疗小儿脓毒性休克及儿科重症监护病房患者的预后
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Oct;17(10):e451-e458. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000906.
4
Effect of a quality improvement program on compliance to the sepsis bundle in non-ICU patients: a multicenter prospective before and after cohort study.质量改进项目对非重症监护病房患者脓毒症集束化治疗依从性的影响:一项多中心前瞻性队列前后对照研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 13;10:1215341. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1215341. eCollection 2023.
5
Multicenter implementation of a severe sepsis and septic shock treatment bundle.多中心实施严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗捆绑包。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul 1;188(1):77-82. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2199OC.
6
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
7
Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on antibiotic use in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia: a before-and-after cohort study.澳大利亚昆士兰州急诊科 1 小时和 3 小时脓毒症时间捆绑对抗生素使用的影响:一项前后队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 5;13(9):e072167. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072167.
8
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.实施一系列用于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的质量指标与死亡率降低相关。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D.
9
Improving adherence to PALS septic shock guidelines.提高对 PALS 脓毒性休克指南的依从性。
Pediatrics. 2014 May;133(5):e1358-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3871. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
10
Patterns and Outcomes Associated With Timeliness of Initial Crystalloid Resuscitation in a Prospective Sepsis and Septic Shock Cohort.前瞻性脓毒症和脓毒性休克队列中初始晶体液复苏及时性相关的模式及结果
Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):1596-1606. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002574.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of an evidence-based sepsis pathway on paediatric hospital clinical practice: A quality improvement study.基于证据的脓毒症治疗路径对儿科医院临床实践的影响:一项质量改进研究。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Apr;37(2):e70036. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.70036.
2
Identification of distinct clinical profiles of sepsis risk in paediatric emergency department patients using Bayesian profile regression.使用贝叶斯轮廓回归识别儿科急诊科患者败血症风险的不同临床特征。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Mar 12;9(1):e003100. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003100.
3
Comparison of Random Forest and Stepwise Regression for Variable Selection Using Low Prevalence Predictors: A case Study in Paediatric Sepsis.

本文引用的文献

1
Metric Development for the Multicenter Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes (IPSO) Collaborative.多中心改善儿科脓毒症结局(IPSO)协作的指标制定。
Pediatrics. 2021 May;147(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-017889. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
Development of a Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative to Improve Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes.开发一个质量改进学习协作组以改善儿科脓毒症结局。
Pediatrics. 2021 Jan;147(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1434. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
3
Improvement of 1st-hour bundle compliance and sepsis mortality in pediatrics after the implementation of the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines.
使用低患病率预测因子进行变量选择时随机森林与逐步回归的比较:儿科脓毒症的案例研究
Matern Child Health J. 2025 May;29(5):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04038-1. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
4
Digital solutions in paediatric sepsis: current state, challenges, and opportunities to improve care around the world.儿科脓毒症中的数字化解决方案:当前状况、挑战和改善全球医疗的机遇。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Sep;6(9):e651-e661. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00141-9. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
5
Resuscitation With Early Adrenaline Infusion for Children With Septic Shock: A Randomized Pilot Trial.早期肾上腺素输注复苏脓毒性休克儿童的随机试验。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;25(2):106-117. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003351. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
6
Impact of parental and healthcare professional concern on the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis: a diagnostic accuracy study.父母及医护人员的关注对儿童脓毒症诊断的影响:一项诊断准确性研究。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Apr 17;11:1140121. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1140121. eCollection 2023.
7
Validation of a paediatric sepsis screening tool to identify children with sepsis in the emergency department: a statewide prospective cohort study in Queensland, Australia.验证一种儿科脓毒症筛查工具,以识别急诊科脓毒症患儿:澳大利亚昆士兰州全州前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 5;13(1):e061431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061431.
8
Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience.电子警报系统对儿科脓毒症筛查的影响:一家三级医院的经验
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 20;12(1):12436. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16632-2.
9
Patient and economic impact of implementing a paediatric sepsis pathway in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.在澳大利亚昆士兰州的急诊科实施儿科脓毒症路径对患者和经济的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 16;12(1):10113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14226-6.
实施拯救脓毒症运动指南后,儿科第 1 小时bundle 达标率和脓毒症死亡率的提高。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2021 Jul-Aug;97(4):459-467. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
4
Accuracy of a Modified qSOFA Score for Predicting Critical Care Admission in Febrile Children.改良 qSOFA 评分对预测发热儿童入住重症监护病房的准确性。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0782.
5
Caring for deteriorating paediatric patients in the emergency department: A mixed method study.急诊科病情恶化的儿科患者护理:一项混合方法研究。
Australas Emerg Care. 2020 Dec;23(4):252-258. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
6
Managing Diagnostic Uncertainty in Pediatric Sepsis Quality Improvement with a Two-Tiered Approach.采用两级方法管理儿童脓毒症诊断不确定性的质量改进
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Jan 11;5(1):e244. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000244. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
7
Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children.拯救脓毒症运动:儿童脓毒性休克和脓毒症相关器官功能障碍管理国际指南。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Feb;46(Suppl 1):10-67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6.
8
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
9
Paediatric sepsis.小儿败血症。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;32(5):497-504. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000583.
10
Reducing Collateral Damage From Mandates for Time to Antibiotics in Pediatric Sepsis-Primum Non Nocere.减少儿科脓毒症中抗生素使用时间规定带来的附带损害——首要原则是不伤害。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 May 1;173(5):409-410. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0174.