• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往剖宫产术后分娩方式计划与儿童特殊教育需求:基于人群的记录链接队列研究。

Planned mode of birth after previous caesarean section and special educational needs in childhood: a population-based record linkage cohort study.

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2021 Dec;128(13):2158-2168. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16828. Epub 2021 Jul 28.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.16828
PMID:34216080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9291107/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between planned mode of birth after previous caesarean section and a child's risk of having a record of special educational needs (SENs).

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

SETTING

Scotland.

POPULATION

A cohort of 44 892 singleton children born at term in Scotland between 2002 and 2011 to women with one or more previous caesarean sections.

METHODS

Linkage of Scottish national health and education data sets.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Any SENs and specific types of SEN recorded when a child was aged 4-11 years and attending a Scottish primary or special school.

RESULTS

Children born following planned vaginal birth after previous caesarean (VBAC) compared with elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) had a similar risk of having a record of any SENs (19.24 versus 17.63%, adjusted risk ratio aRR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99-1.09) or specific types of SEN. There was also little evidence that planned VBAC with or without labour induction compared with ERCS was associated with a child's risk of having a record of any SENs (21.42 versus 17.63%, aRR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17 and 18.78 versus 17.63%, aRR 1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.08, respectively) or most types of SEN. However, an increased risk of sensory impairment was seen for planned VBAC with labour induction compared with ERCS (1.18 versus 0.78%, risk difference 0.4%, adjusted odds ratio aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.09-2.34).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides little evidence of an association between planned mode of birth after previous caesarean and SENs in childhood beyond a small absolute increased risk of sensory impairment seen for planned VBAC with labour induction. This finding may be the result of performing multiple comparisons or residual confounding. The findings provide valuable information to manage and counsel women with previous caesarean section concerning their future birth choices.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

There is little evidence planned mode of birth after previous caesarean section is associated with special educational needs in childhood.

摘要

目的

研究既往剖宫产术后计划分娩方式与儿童特殊教育需求(SEN)记录之间的关联。

设计

基于人群的队列研究。

设置

苏格兰。

人群

2002 年至 2011 年间,在苏格兰足月分娩的 44892 名单胎儿童,母亲曾有过一次或多次剖宫产史。

方法

苏格兰国家卫生和教育数据集的链接。

主要观察指标

4-11 岁儿童在苏格兰小学或特殊学校就读时记录的任何 SEN 及特定类型的 SEN。

结果

与选择性重复剖宫产(ERCS)相比,经阴道分娩(VBAC)后计划分娩的儿童有相似的 SEN 记录风险(19.24%比 17.63%,调整风险比 aRR 1.04,95%CI 0.99-1.09)或特定类型的 SEN。也没有证据表明,与 ERCS 相比,有或没有引产的计划 VBAC 与儿童 SEN 记录风险相关(21.42%比 17.63%,aRR 1.09,95%CI 1.01-1.17 和 18.78%比 17.63%,aRR 1.03,95%CI 0.98-1.08)或大多数类型的 SEN。然而,与 ERCS 相比,计划 VBAC 伴引产与感觉障碍风险增加相关(1.18%比 0.78%,风险差异 0.4%,调整比值比 aOR 1.60,95%CI 1.09-2.34)。

结论

本研究未发现既往剖宫产术后计划分娩方式与儿童期 SEN 之间存在关联,仅发现计划 VBAC 伴引产时感觉障碍风险略有增加。这一发现可能是由于进行了多次比较或存在残余混杂因素。这些发现为管理和咨询有剖宫产史的妇女提供了有价值的信息,以帮助其选择未来的分娩方式。

推文摘要

既往剖宫产术后计划分娩方式与儿童期特殊教育需求之间关联的证据很少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0631/9291107/0066de66c268/BJO-128-2158-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0631/9291107/0066de66c268/BJO-128-2158-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0631/9291107/0066de66c268/BJO-128-2158-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Planned mode of birth after previous caesarean section and special educational needs in childhood: a population-based record linkage cohort study.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式计划与儿童特殊教育需求:基于人群的记录链接队列研究。
BJOG. 2021 Dec;128(13):2158-2168. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16828. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.既往剖宫产术后计划性分娩方式与近期母婴围生结局的关系:苏格兰基于人群的病历关联队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 24;16(9):e1002913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002913. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
Planned mode of birth after previous caesarean section and women's use of psychotropic medication in the first year postpartum: a population-based record linkage cohort study.剖宫产后计划分娩方式与产后第一年女性使用精神药物的关系:基于人群的记录链接队列研究。
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(14):3210-3221. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720005322. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
5
Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section and risk of undergoing pelvic floor surgery: A Scottish population-based record linkage cohort study.既往剖宫产术后计划分娩方式与盆底手术风险:一项苏格兰基于人群的病历关联队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Nov 22;19(11):e1004119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004119. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Planned Repeat Cesarean Section at Term and Adverse Childhood Health Outcomes: A Record-Linkage Study.足月计划性重复剖宫产与儿童期不良健康结局:一项记录链接研究
PLoS Med. 2016 Mar 15;13(3):e1001973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001973. eCollection 2016 Mar.
7
Blood transfusion following intended vaginal birth after cesarean vs elective repeat cesarean section in women with a prior primary cesarean: A population-based record linkage study.有过初次剖宫产的妇女行计划性阴道分娩后与选择性再次剖宫产相比的产后出血情况:基于人群的记录链接研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Mar;98(3):382-389. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13504. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
8
Are There Differences between Women who Choose Elective Repeat Caesarean Versus Trial of Labour in St. John's, NL?在加拿大纽芬兰与拉布拉多省圣约翰市,选择择期再次剖宫产与试产的女性之间存在差异吗?
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jul;40(7):903-909. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.10.021. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
Selected maternal morbidities in women with a prior caesarean delivery planning vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean section: a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System.有剖宫产史且计划经阴道分娩或择期再次剖宫产的女性的特定孕产妇发病率:一项使用英国产科监测系统数据的回顾性队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 2;5(6):e007434. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007434.
10
Trial of labour after two caesarean sections (TOLA2C) and risk of uterine rupture, a retrospective single centre study.剖宫产后再次试产(TOLA2C)与子宫破裂风险:一项回顾性单中心研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06763-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Mode of Birth and Specific Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review.出生方式与特定学习障碍:一项系统综述
Cureus. 2025 Jun 6;17(6):e85459. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85459. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Health outcomes up to 5 years in children born as a second child after a previous caesarean section in a first pregnancy: a Swedish population-based register study between 1999 and 2015.首次剖宫产术后再次妊娠所生二孩至5岁时的健康结局:一项基于瑞典人群登记的1999年至2015年的研究
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Mar 25;9(1):e003026. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003026.
3
Characteristics of women who underwent one or more previous cesarean sections according to Nascer no Brasil.

本文引用的文献

1
Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.既往剖宫产术后计划性分娩方式与近期母婴围生结局的关系:苏格兰基于人群的病历关联队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 24;16(9):e1002913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002913. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2
Stunted microbiota and opportunistic pathogen colonization in caesarean-section birth.剖宫产出生婴儿的发育不良微生物组和机会性病原体定植。
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7776):117-121. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1560-1. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
3
Association of Cesarean Delivery With Risk of Neurodevelopmental and Psychiatric Disorders in the Offspring: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
根据《巴西母婴》(Nascer no Brasil),按之前剖宫产次数分组的产妇特征。
Rev Saude Publica. 2023 Nov 13;57:89. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004819. eCollection 2023.
4
Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section and risk of undergoing pelvic floor surgery: A Scottish population-based record linkage cohort study.既往剖宫产术后计划分娩方式与盆底手术风险:一项苏格兰基于人群的病历关联队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Nov 22;19(11):e1004119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004119. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section: A structured review of the evidence on the associated outcomes for women and their children in high-income setting.既往剖宫产术后的计划分娩方式:对高收入环境下女性及其子女相关结局证据的结构化综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 6;9:920647. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.920647. eCollection 2022.
剖宫产与子代神经发育和精神障碍风险的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910236. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10236.
4
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery.美国妇产科医师学会实践公告第 205 号:剖宫产后的阴道分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e110-e127. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078.
5
Assessing risk of neurodevelopmental disorders after birth with oxytocin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用催产素评估出生后神经发育障碍的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2019 Apr;49(6):881-890. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003021. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
6
Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children.剖宫产术对母婴健康的短期和长期影响。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.
7
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
8
The Human Gut Microbiome - A Potential Controller of Wellness and Disease.人类肠道微生物群——健康与疾病的潜在调控者。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1835. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01835. eCollection 2018.
9
Model checking in multiple imputation: an overview and case study.多重填补中的模型检验:综述与案例研究
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 23;14:8. doi: 10.1186/s12982-017-0062-6. eCollection 2017.
10
The Science of Breastfeeding and Brain Development.母乳喂养与大脑发育的科学
Breastfeed Med. 2017 Oct;12(8):459-461. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.0122. Epub 2017 Aug 24.