Caballero Juan de Dios, Girón Rosa, Del Campo Rosa, Prados Concepción, Barrio María-Isabel, Salcedo Antonio, Cantón Rafael
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Madrid. Red Española de Investigación en Patología Infecciosa (REIPI), Madrid..
Unidad de Fibrosis Quística. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa, Madrid. CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid..
Farm Hosp. 2017 May 1;41(3):391-400. doi: 10.7399/fh.2017.41.3.10746.
Information about antibiotic prescription patterns for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and, specifically, about inhaled treatment strategies for their management is lacking in Spain due to the absence of a national patient registry. In this study we present data about antibiotic prescription in the Spanish CF context that were obtained in a multicenter study, being inhaled treatment strategies the special focus of this work.
Twenty-four specialized CF units (12 adult, 12 pediatric) from 17 tertiary-care hospitals covering all Spanish Autonomous Communities provided sputa and clinical data from 15 consecutive patients. Data about antibiotic and non-antibiotic therapies prescribed to these patients during the year prior inclusion (2013) were retrospectively collected.
The multicenter study included 341 CF patients from all age groups and clinical status. The prevalence of oral, inhaled and intravenous therapies was 89% (n = 302), 80% (n = 273) and 31% (n = 105), respectively. The most prevalent oral agents were ciprofloxacin (n = 177, 59%), cotrimoxazole (n = 109, 36%) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (n = 99, 33%), whereas ceftazidime (n = 53, 50%), tobramycin (n = 43, 41%) and meropenem (n = 41, 49%) were the most prevalent intravenous ones. Two or more different inhaled antibiotics were administered to 67 patients (24%), 51 of them receiving 2 drugs continuously in alternating schemes. Nebulization of intravenous specific antibiotics was common (n = 39) and, in some cases, was used for maintenance purposes.
These results show that the treatment of CF patients is evolving more rapidly than clinical consensus guidelines. Clinical trials evaluating new specific inhaled combinations and new alternative treatment regimes of the existing ones are needed.
由于西班牙缺乏全国性患者登记系统,关于囊性纤维化(CF)患者抗生素处方模式,特别是关于其管理的吸入治疗策略的信息不足。在本研究中,我们展示了在一项多中心研究中获得的西班牙CF背景下抗生素处方的数据,本研究特别关注吸入治疗策略。
来自覆盖西班牙所有自治区的17家三级医院的24个CF专科单位(12个成人单位,12个儿科单位)提供了15例连续患者的痰液和临床数据。回顾性收集了这些患者在纳入前一年(2013年)所开具的抗生素和非抗生素治疗的数据。
该多中心研究纳入了来自所有年龄组和临床状态的341例CF患者。口服、吸入和静脉治疗的患病率分别为89%(n = 302)、80%(n = 273)和31%(n = 105)。最常用的口服药物是环丙沙星(n = 177,59%)、复方新诺明(n = 109,36%)和阿莫西林 - 克拉维酸(n = 99,33%),而头孢他啶(n = 53,50%)、妥布霉素(n = 43,41%)和美罗培南(n = 41,49%)是最常用的静脉药物。67例患者(24%)使用了两种或更多种不同的吸入性抗生素,其中51例患者以交替方案持续接受两种药物治疗。静脉专用抗生素雾化很常见(n = 39),在某些情况下,用于维持治疗。
这些结果表明,CF患者的治疗进展比临床共识指南更快。需要进行临床试验来评估新的特定吸入组合以及现有药物的新替代治疗方案。