Sabzevari Soheil, Kachooei Amir Reza, Giugale Juan, Lin Albert
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Aug;26(8):e252-e258. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 May 3.
Addressing preoperative shoulder stiffness before rotator cuff repair (RCR) is advocated, but the effectiveness of this approach is debatable. We hypothesized that 1-stage treatment of concomitant rotator cuff tear (RCT) with shoulder stiffness has comparable results with isolated RCT.
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched using the keywords of "shoulder stiffness" OR "adhesive capsulitis" OR "frozen shoulder" AND "rotator cuff." Studies that met all the criteria compared the 2 arms of isolated RCT vs. RCT with concomitant shoulder stiffness, received no physical therapy before surgery, and reported data of preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM) and functional outcomes after surgery.
Four level III studies met the inclusion criteria. The non-stiff group (isolated RCT) included 460 patients who underwent RCR; the stiff group (RCT with concomitant shoulder stiffness) included 111 patients who underwent RCR and manipulation under anesthesia with or without capsular release. There were significant differences in preoperative ROM between stiff and non-stiff groups. At final follow-up, there were no statistical differences in all ROM between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in comparing preoperative and postoperative outcome scores including visual analog scale for pain, Constant, modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and University of California-Los Angeles scores.
Concomitant surgical treatment of nonmassive RCT and moderate shoulder stiffness in 1 stage may have comparable results to the surgical treatment of RCT in patients without preoperative stiffness. Therefore, a physical therapy regimen before surgical intervention may not be necessary.
提倡在肩袖修复(RCR)前处理术前肩部僵硬问题,但这种方法的有效性存在争议。我们假设,一期治疗合并肩部僵硬的肩袖撕裂(RCT)与单纯RCT的结果相当。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,使用“肩部僵硬”或“粘连性关节囊炎”或“冻结肩”以及“肩袖”等关键词检索包括MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Scopus在内的数据库。符合所有标准的研究比较了单纯RCT与合并肩部僵硬的RCT两组,术前未接受物理治疗,并报告了术前和术后活动范围(ROM)数据以及术后功能结果。
四项III级研究符合纳入标准。非僵硬组(单纯RCT)包括460例行RCR的患者;僵硬组(合并肩部僵硬的RCT)包括111例行RCR且在麻醉下进行手法操作(有或无关节囊松解)的患者。僵硬组和非僵硬组术前ROM存在显著差异。在末次随访时,两组所有ROM均无统计学差异。比较术前和术后结果评分,包括视觉模拟疼痛量表、Constant评分、改良美国肩肘外科医师评分和加州大学洛杉矶分校评分,均无显著差异。
一期同时手术治疗非巨大RCT和中度肩部僵硬与术前无僵硬患者的RCT手术治疗结果可能相当。因此,手术干预前可能无需进行物理治疗方案。