Yao Nailin, Winkler Anderson M, Barrett Jennifer, Book Gregory A, Beetham Tamara, Horseman Rachel, Leach Olivia, Hodgson Karen, Knowles Emma E, Mathias Samuel, Stevens Michael C, Assaf Michal, van Erp Theo G M, Pearlson Godfrey D, Glahn David C
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Aug;38(8):3757-3770. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23612. Epub 2017 May 8.
Despite over 400 peer-reviewed structural MRI publications documenting neuroanatomic abnormalities in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, the confounding effects of head motion and the regional specificity of these defects are unclear. Using a large cohort of individuals scanned on the same research dedicated MRI with broadly similar protocols, we observe reduced cortical thickness indices in both illnesses, though less pronounced in bipolar disorder. While schizophrenia (n = 226) was associated with wide-spread surface area reductions, bipolar disorder (n = 227) and healthy comparison subjects (n = 370) did not differ. We replicate earlier reports that head motion (estimated from time-series data) influences surface area and cortical thickness measurements and demonstrate that motion influences a portion, but not all, of the observed between-group structural differences. Although the effect sizes for these differences were small to medium, when global indices were covaried during vertex-level analyses, between-group effects became nonsignificant. This analysis raises doubts about the regional specificity of structural brain changes, possible in contrast to functional changes, in affective and psychotic illnesses as measured with current imaging technology. Given that both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder showed cortical thickness reductions, but only schizophrenia showed surface area changes, and assuming these measures are influenced by at least partially unique sets of biological factors, then our results could indicate some degree of specificity between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3757-3770, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
尽管有400多篇经过同行评审的结构磁共振成像(MRI)出版物记录了双相情感障碍和精神分裂症中的神经解剖学异常,但头部运动的混杂效应以及这些缺陷的区域特异性尚不清楚。我们使用一大群在同一台专门用于研究的MRI上扫描、采用大致相似方案的个体,观察到这两种疾病的皮质厚度指数均降低,不过在双相情感障碍中不太明显。精神分裂症患者(n = 226)与广泛的表面积减少有关,而双相情感障碍患者(n = 227)和健康对照者(n = 370)之间没有差异。我们重复了早期的报告,即头部运动(根据时间序列数据估算)会影响表面积和皮质厚度测量,并证明运动影响了部分而非全部观察到的组间结构差异。尽管这些差异的效应大小为小到中等,但在顶点水平分析中对全局指数进行协变量调整后,组间效应变得不显著。该分析对使用当前成像技术测量的情感和精神疾病中脑结构变化的区域特异性提出了质疑,这可能与功能变化形成对比。鉴于精神分裂症和双相情感障碍均显示皮质厚度降低,但只有精神分裂症显示表面积变化,并且假设这些测量至少部分受独特的生物因素集影响,那么我们的结果可能表明双相情感障碍和精神分裂症之间存在一定程度的特异性。《人类大脑图谱》38:3757 - 3770,2017年。© 2017威利期刊公司。