U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington 98108, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Jul;61(7):698-706. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.7.698.
This secondary analysis evaluated the prevalence and stability of homelessness over one year among veterans entering substance abuse treatment and explored associations among housing status, treatment outcomes, and Veterans Affairs (VA) service utilization.
Participants in a trial of on-site primary care for veterans entering substance abuse treatment (N=622) were placed in four groups based on housing status: housed at baseline and final follow-up (41%), homeless at baseline and final follow-up (27%), housed at baseline but homeless at final follow-up (8%), and homeless at baseline but housed at final follow-up (24%). Groups were compared on treatment retention, changes in Addiction Severity Index (ASI) composite scores, and VA service utilization and costs.
Treatment retention and changes in ASI alcohol composites did not differ between groups. Compared with scores in the consistently housed group, the ASI drug composites improved less over time in the consistently homeless group (p=.031) and the ASI psychiatric composites improved less in the group housed at baseline and homeless at final follow-up (p=.019). All homeless groups were more likely than the consistently housed group to have inpatient admissions and incurred higher total treatment costs. The consistently homeless group was more likely to use emergency care than the consistently housed group.
Homelessness affects substance abuse treatment outcomes and costs. Interventions are needed to reduce homelessness among veterans entering substance abuse treatment.
本二次分析评估了进入物质滥用治疗的退伍军人在一年内无家可归的患病率和稳定性,并探讨了住房状况、治疗结果和退伍军人事务部(VA)服务利用之间的关联。
参加退伍军人进入物质滥用治疗现场初级保健试验的参与者(N=622)根据住房状况分为四组:基线和最终随访时住房(41%)、基线和最终随访时无家可归(27%)、基线时住房但最终随访时无家可归(8%)和基线时无家可归但最终随访时住房(24%)。比较各组治疗保留率、成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)综合评分变化以及 VA 服务利用和费用。
治疗保留率和 ASI 酒精综合评分的变化在各组之间没有差异。与一贯住房组的评分相比,一贯无家可归组的 ASI 药物综合评分随时间的改善较小(p=.031),基线住房和最终随访无家可归组的 ASI 精神病学综合评分改善较小(p=.019)。所有无家可归组比一贯住房组更有可能接受住院治疗,并产生更高的总治疗费用。一贯无家可归组比一贯住房组更有可能使用急诊护理。
无家可归会影响物质滥用治疗的结果和成本。需要采取干预措施,减少进入物质滥用治疗的退伍军人中的无家可归现象。