Suppr超能文献

数据密集型科学与科研诚信。

Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity.

作者信息

Resnik David B, Elliott Kevin C, Soranno Patricia A, Smith Elise M

机构信息

a National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences , National Institutes of Health , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina , USA.

b Lyman Briggs College , Michigan State University , East Lansing , Michigan , USA.

出版信息

Account Res. 2017;24(6):344-358. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1327813. Epub 2017 May 8.

Abstract

In this commentary, we consider questions related to research integrity in data-intensive science and argue that there is no need to create a distinct category of misconduct that applies to deception related to processing, analyzing, or interpreting data. The best way to promote integrity in data-intensive science is to maintain a firm commitment to epistemological and ethical values, such as honesty, openness, transparency, and objectivity, which apply to all types of research, and to promote education, policy development, and scholarly debate concerning appropriate uses of statistics.

摘要

在本评论中,我们思考了与数据密集型科学中的研究诚信相关的问题,并认为没有必要设立一个适用于与数据处理、分析或解释相关欺骗行为的独特不当行为类别。促进数据密集型科学诚信的最佳方式是坚定秉持适用于所有类型研究的认识论和伦理价值观,如诚实、开放、透明和客观,并推动有关统计数据恰当使用的教育、政策制定和学术辩论。

相似文献

1
Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity.
Account Res. 2017;24(6):344-358. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2017.1327813. Epub 2017 May 8.
2
Ethical behavior as a stakes game.
Science. 2001 Mar 23;291(5512):2316. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5512.2316a.
4
Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997-2016).
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Oct;24(5):1409-1420. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9962-7. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
5
Research integrity and publication ethics.
Atherosclerosis. 2010 Oct;212(2):383-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.01.050. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
6
Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?
Account Res. 2023 Dec;30(7):439-458. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.2020110. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Research integrity and academic medicine: the pressure to publish and research misconduct.
J Osteopath Med. 2024 Feb 27;124(5):187-194. doi: 10.1515/jom-2023-0211. eCollection 2024 May 1.
8
The integrity of science - lost in translation?
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;28(2):339-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
9
Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1461-1485. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9858-y. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
[Integrity in science: a constant concern].
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2004;66(5-6):321-33.

引用本文的文献

2
The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool.
AI Ethics. 2025 Apr;5(2):1499-1521. doi: 10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8. Epub 2024 May 27.
3
[Research and application implementation of the Internet of Things scheme for intensive care unit medical equipment].
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Feb 25;42(1):65-72. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202411025.
4
Disclosing and Managing Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Publications.
Res Ethics. 2023 Apr;19(2):121-138. doi: 10.1177/17470161221148387. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
6
Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct?
Account Res. 2019 Feb;26(2):123-137. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1570156. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Conceptions of Good Science in Our Data-Rich World.
Bioscience. 2016 Oct 1;66(10):880-889. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw115. Epub 2016 Oct 9.
2
Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods.
Science. 2016 Dec 9;354(6317):1240-1241. doi: 10.1126/science.aah6168.
3
It's Good to Share: Why Environmental Scientists' Ethics Are Out of Date.
Bioscience. 2015 Jan 1;65(1):69-73. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biu169. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
4
Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):136-9. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.006.
5
An international study of research misconduct policies.
Account Res. 2015;22(5):249-66. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.958218.
6
What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology.
Big Data Soc. 2014 Jun 1;1(1). doi: 10.1177/2053951714534395.
7
Challenges of Big Data Analysis.
Natl Sci Rev. 2014 Jun;1(2):293-314. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwt032.
8
Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions.
Account Res. 2015;22(1):14-21. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.891943.
9
Biology: The big challenges of big data.
Nature. 2013 Jun 13;498(7453):255-60. doi: 10.1038/498255a.
10
Misconduct policies in high-impact biomedical journals.
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51928. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051928. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验