• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学研究中使用人工智能的伦理问题:新工具需要新指南。

The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool.

作者信息

Resnik David B, Hosseini Mohammad

机构信息

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, USA.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

AI Ethics. 2025 Apr;5(2):1499-1521. doi: 10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8. Epub 2024 May 27.

DOI:10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8
PMID:40337745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12057767/
Abstract

Using artificial intelligence (AI) in research offers many important benefits for science and society but also creates novel and complex ethical issues. While these ethical issues do not necessitate changing established ethical norms of science, they require the scientific community to develop new guidance for the appropriate use of AI. In this article, we briefly introduce AI and explain how it can be used in research, examine some of the ethical issues raised when using it, and offer nine recommendations for responsible use, including: (1) Researchers are responsible for identifying, describing, reducing, and controlling AI-related biases and random errors; (2) Researchers should disclose, describe, and explain their use of AI in research, including its limitations, in language that can be understood by non-experts; (3) Researchers should engage with impacted communities, populations, and other stakeholders concerning the use of AI in research to obtain their advice and assistance and address their interests and concerns, such as issues related to bias; (4) Researchers who use synthetic data should (a) indicate which parts of the data are synthetic; (b) clearly label the synthetic data; (c) describe how the data were generated; and (d) explain how and why the data were used; (5) AI systems should not be named as authors, inventors, or copyright holders but their contributions to research should be disclosed and described; (6) Education and mentoring in responsible conduct of research should include discussion of ethical use of AI.

摘要

在研究中使用人工智能(AI)为科学和社会带来了许多重要益处,但也引发了新颖而复杂的伦理问题。虽然这些伦理问题并不一定需要改变科学既定的伦理规范,但它们要求科学界为人工智能的恰当使用制定新的指导方针。在本文中,我们简要介绍人工智能,并解释其如何应用于研究,审视使用人工智能时出现的一些伦理问题,并就负责任的使用提出九条建议,包括:(1)研究人员有责任识别、描述、减少和控制与人工智能相关的偏差和随机误差;(2)研究人员应披露、描述并解释他们在研究中对人工智能的使用,包括其局限性,要用非专业人士能理解的语言;(3)研究人员应就研究中人工智能的使用与受影响的社区、人群和其他利益相关者进行沟通,以获取他们的建议和帮助,并解决他们的利益和关切,比如与偏差相关的问题;(4)使用合成数据的研究人员应(a)指明数据的哪些部分是合成的;(b)清晰标注合成数据;(c)描述数据是如何生成的;(d)解释数据的使用方式及原因;(5)人工智能系统不应被列为作者、发明者或版权所有者,但应披露并描述它们对研究的贡献;(6)关于负责任的研究行为的教育和指导应包括对人工智能伦理使用的讨论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/d0bc40e62240/43681_2024_493_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/2f13a6122c25/43681_2024_493_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/716967690938/43681_2024_493_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/3af0c2344deb/43681_2024_493_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/e760637ec09b/43681_2024_493_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/36e5ef309652/43681_2024_493_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/e6bb2725e713/43681_2024_493_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/df4315bcfda5/43681_2024_493_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/d0bc40e62240/43681_2024_493_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/2f13a6122c25/43681_2024_493_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/716967690938/43681_2024_493_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/3af0c2344deb/43681_2024_493_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/e760637ec09b/43681_2024_493_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/36e5ef309652/43681_2024_493_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/e6bb2725e713/43681_2024_493_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/df4315bcfda5/43681_2024_493_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a62a/12058929/d0bc40e62240/43681_2024_493_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool.科学研究中使用人工智能的伦理问题:新工具需要新指南。
AI Ethics. 2025 Apr;5(2):1499-1521. doi: 10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8. Epub 2024 May 27.
2
Ethical implications of artificial intelligence in skin cancer diagnostics: use-case analyses.人工智能在皮肤癌诊断中的伦理意义:用例分析
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Feb 18;192(3):520-529. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae434.
3
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy.您的机器人治疗师现在为您服务:具身人工智能在精神病学、心理学和心理治疗中的伦理意义。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 9;21(5):e13216. doi: 10.2196/13216.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Data stewardship and curation practices in AI-based genomics and automated microscopy image analysis for high-throughput screening studies: promoting robust and ethical AI applications.基于人工智能的基因组学和用于高通量筛选研究的自动显微镜图像分析中的数据管理与整理实践:推动可靠且符合伦理的人工智能应用。
Hum Genomics. 2025 Feb 23;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00716-x.
6
Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence.人工智能时代的出版伦理。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Aug 26;39(33):e249. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249.
7
Twelve tips for addressing ethical concerns in the implementation of artificial intelligence in medical education.人工智能在医学教育中的应用中涉及伦理问题的 12 点建议
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2330250. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2330250. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
8
Ethical Considerations and Fundamental Principles of Large Language Models in Medical Education: Viewpoint.医学教育中大型语言模型的伦理考量与基本原则:观点
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 1;26:e60083. doi: 10.2196/60083.
9
Impact of Responsible AI on the Occurrence and Resolution of Ethical Issues: Protocol for a Scoping Review.负责任的人工智能对伦理问题的发生和解决的影响:范围综述方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 5;13:e52349. doi: 10.2196/52349.
10
Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.人工智能在医疗保健中的公平性:综述与建议。
Jpn J Radiol. 2024 Jan;42(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A plea for caution and guidance about using AI in genomics.关于在基因组学中使用人工智能的谨慎与指导呼吁。
Nat Mach Intell. 2024 Dec;6(12):1409-1410. doi: 10.1038/s42256-024-00947-y. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
2
Ethical theories, governance models, and strategic frameworks for responsible AI adoption and organizational success.负责任的人工智能应用及组织成功的伦理理论、治理模式和战略框架。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jul 16;8:1619029. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1619029. eCollection 2025.
3
The Impact of AI-Driven Chatbot Assistance on Protocol Development and Clinical Research Engagement: An Implementation Report.

本文引用的文献

1
The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts.在撰写学术手稿时披露使用人工智能工具的伦理问题。
Res Ethics. 2023 Oct;19(4):449-465. doi: 10.1177/17470161231180449. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
2
Bridging the literacy gap for surgical consents: an AI-human expert collaborative approach.弥合手术同意书的读写能力差距:一种人工智能与人类专家的协作方法。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 8;7(1):63. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01039-2.
3
Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research.
人工智能驱动的聊天机器人辅助对方案制定和临床研究参与度的影响:一份实施报告。
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 24;15(7):269. doi: 10.3390/jpm15070269.
4
Artificial intelligence policies in bioethics and health humanities: a comparative analysis of publishers and journals.生物伦理学与健康人文学科中的人工智能政策:出版商与期刊的比较分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 3;26(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01239-9.
5
Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence Use for In-House Ethics Checks of Journal Submissions.人工智能用于期刊投稿内部伦理审查的前景
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Jun 2;40(21):e170. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e170.
6
Cutting-edge AI tools revolutionizing scientific research in life sciences.前沿人工智能工具正在彻底改变生命科学领域的科学研究。
BioTechnologia (Pozn). 2025 Mar 31;106(1):77-102. doi: 10.5114/bta/200803. eCollection 2025.
7
Disclosing artificial intelligence use in scientific research and publication: When should disclosure be mandatory, optional, or unnecessary?披露科学研究与出版中人工智能的使用情况:何时披露应为强制、自愿或无需披露?
Account Res. 2025 Mar 24:1-13. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2025.2481949.
人工智能与科研中的理解错觉。
Nature. 2024 Mar;627(8002):49-58. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
4
AI chatbot shows surprising talent for predicting chemical properties and reactions.人工智能聊天机器人在预测化学性质和反应方面展现出惊人的天赋。
Nature. 2024 Feb 6. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00347-7.
5
Human-like intuitive behavior and reasoning biases emerged in large language models but disappeared in ChatGPT.大型语言模型中出现了类人直觉行为和推理偏差,但在 ChatGPT 中这些现象消失了。
Nat Comput Sci. 2023 Oct;3(10):833-838. doi: 10.1038/s43588-023-00527-x. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Is AI leading to a reproducibility crisis in science?人工智能正在引发科学领域的可重复性危机吗?
Nature. 2023 Dec;624(7990):22-25. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03817-6.
7
AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination.AlphaFold 的预测结果是有价值的假说,可以加速但不能替代实验结构确定。
Nat Methods. 2024 Jan;21(1):110-116. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-02087-4. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
8
AI under the microscope: the algorithms powering the search for cells.显微镜下的人工智能:驱动细胞搜索的算法
Nature. 2023 Nov;623(7989):1095-1097. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03722-y.
9
ChatGPT generates fake data set to support scientific hypothesis.ChatGPT生成虚假数据集以支持科学假设。
Nature. 2023 Nov;623(7989):895-896. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03635-w.
10
Hypotheses devised by AI could find 'blind spots' in research.人工智能设计的假设可能会发现研究中的“盲点”。
Nature. 2023 Nov 17. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03596-0.