Golovynskyi Sergii, Seravalli Luca, Datsenko Oleksandr, Trevisi Giovanna, Frigeri Paola, Gombia Enos, Golovynska Iuliia, Kondratenko Serhiy V, Qu Junle, Ohulchanskyy Tymish Y
College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, Shenzhen University, 518060, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, NAS of Ukraine, 45 Nauki Ave, 03028, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017 Dec;12(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2091-z. Epub 2017 May 5.
Optical and photoelectric properties of metamorphic InAs/InGaAs and conventional pseudomorphic InAs/GaAs quantum dot (QD) structures were studied. We used two different electrical contact configurations that allowed us to have the current flow (i) only through QDs and embedding layers and (ii) through all the structure, including the GaAs substrate (wafer). Different optical transitions between states of QDs, wetting layers, GaAs or InGaAs buffers, and defect-related centers were studied by means of photovoltage (PV), photoconductivity (PC), photoluminescence (PL), and absorption spectroscopies. It was shown that the use of the InGaAs buffer spectrally shifted the maximum of the QD PL band to 1.3 μm (telecommunication range) without a decrease in the yield. Photosensitivity for the metamorphic QDs was found to be higher than that in GaAs buffer while the photoresponses for both metamorphic and pseudomorphic buffer layers were similar. The mechanisms of PV and PC were discussed for both structures. The dissimilarities in properties of the studied structures are explained in terms of the different design. A critical influence of the defects on the photoelectrical properties of both structures was observed in the spectral range from 0.68 to 1.0 eV for contact configuration (ii), i.e., in the case of electrically active GaAs wafer. No effect of such defects on the photoelectric spectra was found for configuration (i), when the structures were contacted to the top and bottom buffers; only a 0.83 eV feature was observed in the photocurrent spectrum of pseudomorphic structure and interpreted to be related to defects close to InAs/GaAs QDs.
研究了变质InAs/InGaAs和传统赝晶InAs/GaAs量子点(QD)结构的光学和光电特性。我们使用了两种不同的电接触配置,这使我们能够使电流(i)仅通过量子点和嵌入层,以及(ii)通过包括GaAs衬底(晶片)在内的整个结构。通过光电压(PV)、光导率(PC)、光致发光(PL)和吸收光谱研究了量子点、润湿层、GaAs或InGaAs缓冲层以及与缺陷相关的中心之间不同的光学跃迁。结果表明,使用InGaAs缓冲层可将量子点PL带的最大值光谱位移至1.3μm(电信范围),而产率没有降低。发现变质量子点的光敏性高于GaAs缓冲层中的光敏性,而变质和赝晶缓冲层的光响应相似。讨论了两种结构的PV和PC机制。根据不同的设计解释了所研究结构特性的差异。对于接触配置(ii),即在电活性GaAs晶片的情况下,在0.68至1.0eV的光谱范围内观察到缺陷对两种结构的光电特性有关键影响。对于配置(i),当结构与顶部和底部缓冲层接触时,未发现此类缺陷对光电光谱有影响;在赝晶结构的光电流光谱中仅观察到一个0.83eV的特征,并解释为与InAs/GaAs量子点附近的缺陷有关。