Razaz Neda, Avitan Tehila, Ting Joseph, Pressey Tracy, Joseph K S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Razaz, Pressey, Joseph), University of British Columbia, and BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Razaz), Karolinska University Hospital in Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Avitan), Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Pediatrics (Ting) and School of Population and Public Health (Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Razaz, Pressey, Joseph), University of British Columbia, and BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Razaz), Karolinska University Hospital in Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Avitan), Hadassah Medical Centre, Jerusalem, Israel; Department of Pediatrics (Ting) and School of Population and Public Health (Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
CMAJ. 2017 May 8;189(18):E652-E658. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160722.
There is currently insufficient evidence regarding the prognosis of multifetal pregnancy following elective fetal reduction to twin or singleton pregnancy. We compared perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with and without fetal reduction.
We used data on all stillbirths and live births in British Columbia, Canada, from 2009 to 2013. We compared outcomes of multifetal pregnancies with fetal reduction (to twin or singleton pregnancy) with outcomes of pregnancies without fetal reduction. The primary outcome was a composite of serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death. Other outcomes studied included preterm birth, low birth weight and small-for-gestational-age live birth.
The rate of serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death did not differ significantly between pregnancies reduced to twins and unreduced triplet pregnancies (adjusted rate ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-1.07) or between pregnancies reduced to singletons and unreduced twin pregnancies (adjusted rate ratio 1.57, 95% CI 0.74-3.33). The rate was significantly lower in the fetal reduction group reduced to twins versus unreduced triplet pregnancies when we restricted the analysis to pregnancies conceived following the use of assisted reproduction technologies (adjusted rate ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.67). The rates of preterm birth, very preterm birth, low birth weight and very low birth weight were significantly lower among pregnancies reduced to twins than among unreduced triplet pregnancies. Compared with unreduced twin pregnancies, pregnancies reduced to singletons had lower rates of preterm birth and low birth weight.
Fetal reduction to twins and singletons was not associated with a decreased risk of serious neonatal morbidity or perinatal death. However, such fetal reduction was associated with substantial improvements in several other perinatal outcomes, such as preterm birth and low birth weight. Clinicians discussing the risks associated with multifetal pregnancy should counsel parents on the potential risks and benefits of fetal reduction.
目前,关于选择性减胎后多胎妊娠转为双胎或单胎妊娠的预后,证据尚不充分。我们比较了减胎妊娠和未减胎妊娠的围产期结局。
我们使用了加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省2009年至2013年所有死产和活产的数据。我们比较了进行减胎(转为双胎或单胎妊娠)的多胎妊娠结局与未减胎妊娠的结局。主要结局是严重新生儿发病率或围产期死亡的综合情况。研究的其他结局包括早产、低出生体重和小于胎龄儿活产。
减为双胎的妊娠与未减胎的三胎妊娠相比,严重新生儿发病率或围产期死亡的发生率无显著差异(调整率比0.50,95%置信区间[CI]0.24 - 1.07);减为单胎的妊娠与未减胎的双胎妊娠相比,严重新生儿发病率或围产期死亡的发生率也无显著差异(调整率比1.57,95%CI0.74 - 3.33)。当我们将分析限制在使用辅助生殖技术后受孕的妊娠时,减为双胎的减胎组妊娠与未减胎的三胎妊娠相比,该发生率显著降低(调整率比0.35,95%CI0.18 - 0.67)。减为双胎的妊娠中早产、极早产、低出生体重和极低出生体重的发生率显著低于未减胎的三胎妊娠。与未减胎的双胎妊娠相比,减为单胎的妊娠早产和低出生体重的发生率较低。
减胎为双胎和单胎与严重新生儿发病率或围产期死亡风险降低无关。然而,这种减胎与其他一些围产期结局的显著改善有关,如早产和低出生体重。讨论多胎妊娠相关风险的临床医生应就减胎的潜在风险和益处向父母提供咨询。