Suppr超能文献

解剖与非解剖前交叉韧带重建的股骨隧道长度和倾斜度比较:荟萃分析。

Comparison of femoral tunnel length and obliquity of anatomic versus nonanatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute for Skeletal Aging & Orthopedic Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 23;15(3):e0230497. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230497. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Theoretical considerations suggest that femoral tunnel length might cause graft mismatch, and femoral tunnel obliquity could be related to the longevity of graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, controversy still exists regarding these issues in the context of the comparison of anatomic and nonanatomic ACL reconstructions. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the length and obliquity of the femoral tunnel created by drilling through either anatomic or nonanatomic ACL reconstructions.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

In this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that compared femoral tunnel length and femoral tunnel obliquity in the coronal plane with the use of anatomic or nonanatomic ACL reconstruction. The major databases were reviewed for appropriate studies from the earliest available date of indexing through December 31, 2018. No restrictions were placed on the language of publication.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies met the criteria for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The femur tunnel length of anatomic ACL reconstruction was significantly shorter compared with that of nonanatomic ACL reconstruction by 8.66 mm (95% CI: 7.10-10.22 mm; P<0.001), while the femur tunnel obliquity in the coronal plane of anatomic ACL reconstruction was significantly more oblique versus that of nonanatomic ACL reconstruction by 15.29° (95% CI: 8.07°-22.52°; P<0.001). Similar results in terms of femoral tunnel length were found for the subgroup with cadaveric (7.15 mm; 95% CI: 2.69-11.61 mm; P = 0.002) and noncadaveric (8.96 mm; 95% CI: 7.24-10.69 mm; P<0.001) studies, whereas different results in terms of femoral tunnel obliquity were noted for the subgroup with cadaveric (10.62°; 95% CI: -6.12° to 27.37°; P = 0.21) and noncadaveric (15.86°; 95% CI: 8.11°-23.60°; P<0.001) studies.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic ACL reconstruction resulted in the femoral tunnel length and femoral tunnel obliquity in the coronal plane being shorter and more oblique, respectively, as compared with nonanatomic ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level III.

摘要

目的

理论上认为,股骨隧道的长度可能会导致移植物不匹配,而股骨隧道的倾斜角度可能与前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中移植物的耐久性有关。然而,在解剖学和非解剖学 ACL 重建的比较中,这些问题仍存在争议。本荟萃分析的目的是比较通过解剖学或非解剖学 ACL 重建钻孔所产生的股骨隧道的长度和倾斜度。

材料与方法

在这项荟萃分析中,我们回顾了比较使用解剖学或非解剖学 ACL 重建时股骨隧道长度和冠状面股骨隧道倾斜度的研究。从最早的索引日期到 2018 年 12 月 31 日,我们审查了主要数据库中合适的研究。出版语言不受限制。

结果

27 项研究符合纳入本荟萃分析的标准。解剖学 ACL 重建的股骨隧道长度明显短于非解剖学 ACL 重建,相差 8.66mm(95%CI:7.10-10.22mm;P<0.001),而解剖学 ACL 重建在冠状面的股骨隧道倾斜度明显大于非解剖学 ACL 重建,相差 15.29°(95%CI:8.07°-22.52°;P<0.001)。在尸体(7.15mm;95%CI:2.69-11.61mm;P=0.002)和非尸体(8.96mm;95%CI:7.24-10.69mm;P<0.001)研究的亚组中,股骨隧道长度的结果相似,而在尸体(10.62°;95%CI:-6.12°至 27.37°;P=0.21)和非尸体(15.86°;95%CI:8.11°-23.60°;P<0.001)研究的亚组中,股骨隧道倾斜度的结果不同。

结论

与非解剖学 ACL 重建相比,解剖学 ACL 重建导致股骨隧道长度和冠状面股骨隧道倾斜度更短和更倾斜。

证据水平

治疗性研究,III 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a97/7089554/4c496a501997/pone.0230497.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验