Li Xiong, Cao Wu, Zhou Hongyu, Ji Ruida, Xiao Jian, Zhao Chen
Department of Orthopedics, Jiashan County First People's Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang.
Department of Orthopedics, Center for Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital(Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang.
Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Feb 12;34(1):11970. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.11970.
Our main objective was to examine the curative effect of all inside technique and traditional technique in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. In our retrospective study at the First People's Hospital of Jiashan County, we analyzed 88 participants with ACL injuries (50 males, 38 females, average age 27 years). They were randomly divided into two groups: traditional ACL reconstruction (42 participants) and all inside ACL reconstruction (46 participants). We measured and recorded the Visual Analog Scores (VAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm scores, operation time, graft diameter and length between the traditional technique group and all inside technique group. There were statistically significant differences in the Lysholm scores and IKDC scores between traditional and all inside technique groups. The all inside technique showed a higher efficacy and effective post-operative recovery with minimal pain and recurrent injuries. Our findings showed that the differences in gender, age, side of injury and operation time were not significant (p> 0.05). Follow-up was conducted at 6 months and 12 months post operations (mean, 7.5 ± 1.1 months). All inside technique minimizing tissue disruption, optimizing graft placement and facilitating early recovery have a significant impact on patient outcomes.
我们的主要目的是研究全内技术和传统技术在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中的疗效。在嘉善县第一人民医院的回顾性研究中,我们分析了88例ACL损伤患者(男性50例,女性38例,平均年龄27岁)。他们被随机分为两组:传统ACL重建组(42例)和全内ACL重建组(46例)。我们测量并记录了传统技术组和全内技术组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm评分、手术时间、移植物直径和长度。传统技术组和全内技术组的Lysholm评分和IKDC评分存在统计学显著差异。全内技术显示出更高的疗效和有效的术后恢复,疼痛和再损伤最小。我们的研究结果表明,性别、年龄、损伤侧和手术时间的差异不显著(p>0.05)。术后6个月和12个月进行随访(平均,7.5±1.1个月)。全内技术最大限度地减少组织破坏、优化移植物放置并促进早期恢复,对患者预后有显著影响。