Research Information Solutions and Innovation, Nationwide Children's Hospital, 575 Children's Crossroad, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA.
College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Dec;30(6):710-717. doi: 10.1007/s10278-017-9972-7.
Highly complex medical documents, including ultrasound reports, are greatly mismatched with patient literacy levels. While improving radiology reports for readability is a longstanding concern, few articles objectively measure the effectiveness of physician training for readability improvement. We hypothesized that writing styles may be evaluated using an objective two-dimensional measure and writing training could improve the writing styles of radiologists. To test it, a simplified "grade vs. length" readability metric is developed based on results from factor analysis of ten readability metrics applied to more than 500,000 radiology reports. To test the short-term effectiveness of a writing workshop, we measured the writing style improvement before and after the training. Statistically significant writing style improvement occurred as a result of the training. Although the degree of improvement varied for different measures, it is evident that targeted training could provide potential benefits to improve readability due to our statistically significant results. The simplified grade vs. length metric enables future clinical decision support systems to quantitatively guide physicians to improve writing styles through writing workshops.
高度复杂的医学文献,包括超声报告,与患者的文化水平极不匹配。虽然提高放射科报告的可读性是一个长期存在的问题,但很少有文章客观地衡量医生培训对提高可读性的效果。我们假设可以使用客观的二维度量来评估写作风格,并且写作培训可以提高放射科医生的写作风格。为了验证这一点,我们根据对 50 多万份放射学报告进行的十种可读性度量的因子分析的结果,开发了一种简化的“等级与长度”可读性度量标准。为了测试写作研讨会的短期效果,我们在培训前后测量了写作风格的改进。培训后写作风格显著改善。尽管不同的测量方法的改进程度有所不同,但由于我们的统计结果具有显著性,有针对性的培训显然可以提高可读性,从而带来潜在的好处。简化的等级与长度度量标准使未来的临床决策支持系统能够通过写作研讨会来定量指导医生改善写作风格。