• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在麻醉大鼠中形成的气味和味觉厌恶。

Odor and taste aversions conditioned in anesthetized rats.

作者信息

Bermudez-Rattoni F, Forthman D L, Sanchez M A, Perez J L, Garcia J

机构信息

Instituto de Fisiologia Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Distrito.

出版信息

Behav Neurosci. 1988 Oct;102(5):726-32. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.102.5.726.

DOI:10.1037//0735-7044.102.5.726
PMID:2848537
Abstract

Conditioned flavor aversions (CFA) are acquired by anesthetized rats but effects of various anesthetics on acquisition of aversions for separate odor and taste components are unknown. In Experiment 1, rats drank tomato juice and then were tranquilized with "Innovar-Vet" or "Rompun" before receiving injections of lithium chloride. Neither drug interfered with acquisition of aversions. Innovar-Vet alone produced no aversions; Rompun alone produced mild aversions but did not enhance aversions when combined with lithium. In Experiments 2 and 3, rats received a compound odor/taste cue as they drank and then were anesthetized with pentobarbital before lithium injections. Anesthesia alone produced negligible aversions but facilitated taste-lithium aversions. During odor tests, odor aversions were weaker than taste aversions. These data extend previous work and suggest that CFA does not result from ordinary classical conditioning. A tripartite notation that unites CFA and classical conditioning is discussed.

摘要

条件性味觉厌恶(CFA)可在麻醉大鼠身上习得,但各种麻醉剂对单独气味和味道成分厌恶习得的影响尚不清楚。在实验1中,大鼠饮用番茄汁,然后在注射氯化锂之前用“Innovar-Vet”或“Rompun”使其镇静。两种药物均未干扰厌恶的习得。单独使用Innovar-Vet不会产生厌恶;单独使用Rompun会产生轻微厌恶,但与锂联合使用时不会增强厌恶。在实验2和3中,大鼠在饮用时接受复合气味/味道线索,然后在注射锂之前用戊巴比妥麻醉。单独麻醉产生的厌恶可忽略不计,但促进了味觉-锂厌恶。在气味测试期间,气味厌恶比味觉厌恶弱。这些数据扩展了先前的研究工作,并表明CFA并非源于普通的经典条件作用。讨论了一种将CFA和经典条件作用结合起来的三方表示法。

相似文献

1
Odor and taste aversions conditioned in anesthetized rats.在麻醉大鼠中形成的气味和味觉厌恶。
Behav Neurosci. 1988 Oct;102(5):726-32. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.102.5.726.
2
Disruption of neophobia, conditioned odor aversion, and conditioned taste aversion in rats with hippocampal lesions.海马体损伤大鼠的新物体恐惧症、条件性气味厌恶和条件性味觉厌恶的破坏。
Behav Neural Biol. 1986 Mar;45(2):240-53. doi: 10.1016/s0163-1047(86)90816-2.
3
Odor of taste stimuli in conditioned "taste" aversion learning.条件性“味觉”厌恶学习中味觉刺激的气味
Behav Neurosci. 2004 Dec;118(6):1400-8. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.6.1400.
4
Flavor-illness aversions: gustatory neocortex ablations disrupt taste but not taste-potentiated odor cues.味道-疾病厌恶:味觉新皮层切除会破坏味觉,但不会破坏味觉增强的气味线索。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1982 Aug;96(4):540-8. doi: 10.1037/h0077910.
5
Flavor-illness aversions: the role of the amygdala in the acquisition of taste-potentiated odor aversions.味道-疾病厌恶:杏仁核在味觉增强气味厌恶习得中的作用。
Physiol Behav. 1986 Oct;38(4):503-8. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90417-8.
6
Flavor-illness aversions: potentiation of odor by taste with toxin but not shock in rats.味道-疾病厌恶:大鼠中味觉与毒素而非电击对气味的增强作用。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1982 Aug;96(4):527-39. doi: 10.1037/h0077902.
7
The effect of amygdala-kindled seizures on the acquisition of taste and odor aversions.杏仁核点燃癫痫发作对味觉和嗅觉厌恶学习的影响。
Physiol Behav. 1984 Jun;32(6):967-72. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(84)90287-7.
8
Developmental flavor experience affects utilization of odor, not taste in toxiphobic conditioning.发育过程中的味觉体验影响对气味的利用,而非在恐毒条件反射中的味觉。
Behav Neural Biol. 1983 Nov;39(2):160-80. doi: 10.1016/s0163-1047(83)90808-7.
9
Effect of pairings of pentobarbital with lithium chloride on the capacity of pentobarbital to maintain a conditioned aversion.戊巴比妥与氯化锂配对对戊巴比妥维持条件性厌恶能力的影响。
Behav Neural Biol. 1983 Sep;39(1):145-8. doi: 10.1016/s0163-1047(83)90773-2.
10
Potentiation of odor by taste in rats: tests of some nonassociative factors.大鼠中味觉对气味的增强作用:一些非联想因素的测试。
J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1982 Oct;96(5):775-80. doi: 10.1037/h0077915.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidental temporal binding in rats: A novel behavioral task.大鼠的偶然时间绑定:一种新的行为任务。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 22;18(6):e0274437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274437. eCollection 2023.
2
What Is It Like to Be a Bass? Red Herrings, Fish Pain and the Study of Animal Sentience.做一条鲈鱼是什么感觉?转移注意力的事物、鱼类疼痛与动物感知研究。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 27;9:788289. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.788289. eCollection 2022.
3
Towards a comparative science of emotion: Affect and consciousness in humans and animals.迈向情感的比较科学:人类与动物的情感与意识。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:749-770. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.014. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
4
Dissociable learning processes, associative theory, and testimonial reviews: A comment on Smith and Church (2018).可分离学习过程、联想理论和证言评价:对史密斯和丘奇(2018)的评论。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1988-1993. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01644-3.
5
Examination of validity of a conditioned odor aversion (COA) procedure using low-dose of organic solvent as an applied procedure of the conditioned taste aversion.采用低剂量有机溶剂作为条件味觉厌恶的应用程序,检验条件性气味厌恶(COA)程序的有效性。
Ind Health. 2018 Apr 7;56(2):141-149. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2017-0041. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
6
Conditioned taste aversions: From poisons to pain to drugs of abuse.条件性味觉厌恶:从毒药到疼痛再到滥用药物。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):335-351. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1092-8.
7
Conditioned taste aversion, drugs of abuse and palatability.条件性味觉厌恶、成瘾性药物与适口性
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:28-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 9.
8
Tracking variable environments: There is more than one kind of memory.追踪变量环境:记忆不止一种。
J Chem Ecol. 1995 Jul;21(7):911-23. doi: 10.1007/BF02033798.
9
Reduced palatability in drug-induced taste aversion: II. Aversive and rewarding unconditioned stimuli.药物诱导性味觉厌恶中的适口性降低:II. 厌恶和奖赏性非条件刺激
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Jun;126(3):433-44. doi: 10.1037/a0027676. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
10
Implicit versus explicit associative learning and experimentally induced placebo hypoalgesia.内隐联想学习与实验性诱导安慰剂镇痛。
J Pain Res. 2011 Mar 15;4:67-77. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S15966.