Bressi Federica, Vella Paola, Casale Manuele, Moffa Antonio, Sabatino Lorenzo, Lopez Michele Antonio, Carinci Francesco, Papalia Rocco, Salvinelli Fabrizio, Sterzi Silvia
1 Unit Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
2 Unit of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;30(2):113-122. doi: 10.1177/0394632017709917. Epub 2017 May 9.
The objective of this article is to systematically review the evidence on the effectiveness of vestibular rehabilitation (VR) in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Relevant published studies about VR in BPPV were searched in PubMed, Google Scholar and Ovid using various keywords. We included trials that were available in the English language and did not apply publication year or publication status restrictions. Studies based on the VR in other peripheral and/or central balance disorders are excluded. Primary outcome was the effect on vertigo attacks and balance. Of 42 identified trials, only 12 trials fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Three of them investigated the role of VR in patients with BPPV comparing with no treatment, two of them evaluated the efficacy of VR versus medications, seven of them have highlighted the benefits of the VR alone or in combination with canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) compared to CRP alone. The studies differed in type of intervention, type of outcome and follow-up time. VR improves balance control, promoting visual stabilization with head movements, improving vestibular-visual interaction during head movement and expanding static and dynamic posture stability. CRP and VR seem to have a synergic effect in patients with BPPV, especially in elderly patients. VR does not reduce the recurrence rate, but it seems to reduce the unpleasantness. So VR can substitute CRP when spine comorbidities contraindicate CRP and can reduce the uptake of anti-vertigo drugs post CRP. Further studies are needed to confirm these encouraging results.
本文的目的是系统回顾关于前庭康复(VR)对良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)患者有效性的证据。使用各种关键词在PubMed、谷歌学术和Ovid中搜索有关BPPV中VR的相关已发表研究。我们纳入了英文可用的试验,且未应用出版年份或出版状态限制。排除基于其他外周和/或中枢平衡障碍的VR研究。主要结局是对眩晕发作和平衡的影响。在42项已识别的试验中,只有12项试验符合我们的纳入标准并被纳入本综述。其中三项研究了VR在BPPV患者中与不治疗相比的作用,两项评估了VR与药物相比的疗效,七项强调了单独使用VR或与耳石复位程序(CRP)联合使用与单独使用CRP相比的益处。这些研究在干预类型、结局类型和随访时间方面存在差异。VR可改善平衡控制,促进头部运动时的视觉稳定,改善头部运动期间的前庭-视觉相互作用,并扩大静态和动态姿势稳定性。CRP和VR在BPPV患者中似乎具有协同作用,尤其是在老年患者中。VR不会降低复发率,但似乎可减轻不适感。因此,当脊柱合并症禁忌CRP时,VR可替代CRP,并可减少CRP后抗眩晕药物的使用。需要进一步研究来证实这些令人鼓舞的结果。