Scherbaum Stefan, Haber Paul, Morley Kirsten, Underhill Dylan, Moustafa Ahmed A
a Department of Psychology , Technische Universität Dresden , Dresden , Germany.
b NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, Discipline of Addiction Medicine, Central Clinical School , The University of Sydney , Camperdown , NSW , Australia.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Mar;40(2):139-150. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1324022. Epub 2017 May 9.
People with addiction will continue to use drugs despite adverse long-term consequences. We hypothesized (a) that this deficit persists during substitution treatment, and (b) that this deficit might be related not only to a desire for immediate gratification, but also to a lower sensitivity for optimal decision making. We investigated how individuals with a history of heroin addiction perform (compared to healthy controls) in a virtual reality delay discounting task. This novel task adds to established measures of delay discounting an assessment of the optimality of decisions, especially in how far decisions are influenced by a general choice bias and/or a reduced sensitivity to the relative value of the two alternative rewards. We used this measure of optimality to apply diffusion model analysis to the behavioral data to analyze the interaction between decision optimality and reaction time. The addiction group consisted of 25 patients with a history of heroin dependency currently participating in a methadone maintenance program; the control group consisted of 25 healthy participants with no history of substance abuse, who were recruited from the Western Sydney community.
The patient group demonstrated greater levels of delay discounting compared to the control group, which is broadly in line with previous observations. Diffusion model analysis yielded a reduced sensitivity for the optimality of a decision in the patient group compared to the control group. This reduced sensitivity was reflected in lower rates of information accumulation and higher decision criteria.
Increased discounting in individuals with heroin addiction is related not only to a generally increased bias to immediate gratification, but also to reduced sensitivity for the optimality of a decision. This finding is in line with other findings about the sensitivity of addicts in distinguishing optimal from nonoptimal choice options.
患有成瘾症的人尽管会面临长期不良后果,仍会继续使用毒品。我们假设:(a)这种缺陷在替代治疗期间持续存在;(b)这种缺陷可能不仅与即时满足的欲望有关,还与最佳决策的较低敏感性有关。我们研究了有海洛因成瘾史的个体(与健康对照组相比)在虚拟现实延迟折扣任务中的表现。这项新颖的任务在既定的延迟折扣测量方法中增加了对决策最优性的评估,特别是在决策受一般选择偏差和/或对两种替代奖励相对价值的敏感性降低影响的程度方面。我们使用这种最优性测量方法对行为数据应用扩散模型分析,以分析决策最优性与反应时间之间的相互作用。成瘾组由25名有海洛因依赖史且目前正在参加美沙酮维持治疗项目的患者组成;对照组由25名无药物滥用史的健康参与者组成,他们从西悉尼社区招募而来。
与对照组相比,患者组表现出更高水平的延迟折扣,这与先前的观察结果大致一致。扩散模型分析表明,与对照组相比,患者组对决策最优性的敏感性降低。这种敏感性降低表现为信息积累率较低和决策标准较高。
海洛因成瘾个体中增加的折扣不仅与即时满足的普遍偏差增加有关,还与对决策最优性的敏感性降低有关。这一发现与关于成瘾者在区分最优与非最优选择选项时的敏感性的其他发现一致。