• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲基苯丙胺使用障碍中多步计划缺陷的计算机制。

Computational mechanisms underlying multi-step planning deficits in methamphetamine use disorder.

作者信息

Lavalley Claire A, Mehta Marishka M, Taylor Samuel, Chuning Anne E, Stewart Jennifer L, Huys Quentin J M, Khalsa Sahib S, Paulus Martin P, Smith Ryan

机构信息

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA.

University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USA.

出版信息

Transl Psychiatry. 2025 May 24;15(1):181. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03390-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41398-025-03390-8
PMID:40413170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12103525/
Abstract

Current theories suggest individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (iMUDs) have difficulty considering long-term outcomes in decision-making, which could contribute to risk of relapse. Aversive interoceptive states (e.g., stress, withdrawal) are also known to increase this risk. The present study analyzed computational mechanisms of planning in iMUDs, and examined the potential impact of an aversive interoceptive state induction. A group of 40 iMUDs and 49 healthy participants completed two runs of a multi-step planning task, with and without an anxiogenic breathing resistance manipulation. Computational modeling revealed that iMUDs had selective difficulty identifying the best overall plan when this required enduring negative short-term outcomes - a mechanism referred to as aversive pruning. Increases in reported craving before and after the induction also predicted greater aversive pruning in iMUDs. These results highlight aversive pruning deficits as a novel mechanism that could promote poor choice in recovering iMUDs and create vulnerability to relapse.

摘要

当前理论表明,患有甲基苯丙胺使用障碍(iMUDs)的个体在决策时难以考虑长期结果,这可能会增加复发风险。厌恶的内感受状态(如压力、戒断)也会增加这种风险。本研究分析了iMUDs中规划的计算机制,并考察了厌恶内感受状态诱导的潜在影响。一组40名iMUDs患者和49名健康参与者完成了两轮多步骤规划任务,一轮有引发焦虑的呼吸阻力操作,另一轮没有。计算模型显示,当需要忍受负面短期结果时,iMUDs在识别最佳总体计划方面存在选择性困难——这一机制被称为厌恶修剪。诱导前后报告的渴望增加也预示着iMUDs中更大程度的厌恶修剪。这些结果突出了厌恶修剪缺陷是一种新机制,它可能导致康复中的iMUDs做出糟糕的选择,并产生复发的易感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/ec24ed94498f/41398_2025_3390_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/d3fb84bdaf30/41398_2025_3390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/7f6fe2424041/41398_2025_3390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/fa777c7eec8f/41398_2025_3390_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/b0b60b2fbe82/41398_2025_3390_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/ec24ed94498f/41398_2025_3390_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/d3fb84bdaf30/41398_2025_3390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/7f6fe2424041/41398_2025_3390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/fa777c7eec8f/41398_2025_3390_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/b0b60b2fbe82/41398_2025_3390_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e5/12103525/ec24ed94498f/41398_2025_3390_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Computational mechanisms underlying multi-step planning deficits in methamphetamine use disorder.甲基苯丙胺使用障碍中多步计划缺陷的计算机制。
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 May 24;15(1):181. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03390-8.
2
Computational Mechanisms Underlying Multi-Step Planning Deficits in Methamphetamine Use Disorder.甲基苯丙胺使用障碍中多步规划缺陷背后的计算机制
medRxiv. 2024 Jun 28:2024.06.27.24309581. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.27.24309581.
3
You are the danger: attenuated insula response in methamphetamine users during aversive interoceptive decision-making.你就是危险所在:甲基苯丙胺使用者在厌恶的内感受性决策过程中脑岛反应减弱。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Sep 1;142:110-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
4
Self-control and interoception: Linking the neural substrates of craving regulation and the prediction of aversive interoceptive states induced by inspiratory breathing restriction.自我控制和内脏感知:连接渴望调节的神经基础和预测吸气呼吸限制引起的厌恶内脏感知状态。
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116841. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116841. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Risky decision making, prefrontal cortex, and mesocorticolimbic functional connectivity in methamphetamine dependence.甲基苯丙胺成瘾者的冒险决策、前额叶皮层和中边缘皮质连接的功能连通性。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 1;71(7):812-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.399.
6
Self-control is linked to interoceptive inference: Craving regulation and the prediction of aversive interoceptive states induced with inspiratory breathing load.自我控制与内感受推断有关:渴望调节和预测吸气负荷引起的厌恶内感受状态。
Cognition. 2019 Dec;193:104028. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104028. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
7
Modulation of dlPFC function and decision-making capacity by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in methamphetamine use disorder.重复经颅磁刺激对甲基苯丙胺使用障碍者 dlPFC 功能和决策能力的调节。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 8;14(1):280. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03000-z.
8
The Neural Basis of Aversive Pavlovian Guidance during Planning.规划过程中厌恶性巴甫洛夫引导的神经基础。
J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 18;37(42):10215-10229. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0085-17.2017. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Prior Methamphetamine Use Disorder History Does Not Impair Interoceptive Processing of Soft Touch in HIV Infection.既往甲基苯丙胺使用障碍史并不损害 HIV 感染患者对轻触的内脏加工处理。
Viruses. 2021 Dec 10;13(12):2476. doi: 10.3390/v13122476.
10
Does alexithymia explain variation in cue-elicited craving reported by methamphetamine-dependent individuals?述情障碍能否解释甲基苯丙胺依赖者报告的线索诱发渴求的变化?
Am J Addict. 2012 Mar-Apr;21(2):130-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00214.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.情感状态在计算精神病学中的作用。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 Aug 1;28(8). doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf049.

本文引用的文献

1
Directed exploration is reduced by an aversive interoceptive state induction in healthy individuals but not in those with affective disorders.在健康个体中,厌恶的内感受状态诱导会减少定向探索,但在情感障碍患者中则不会。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 5. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-02980-8.
2
Factors associated with cognitive flexibility in people with opioid-use disorder: a pilot study.阿片类物质使用障碍患者认知灵活性的相关因素:一项初步研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 19;15:1505391. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1505391. eCollection 2024.
3
Alcohol, flexible behavior, and the prefrontal cortex: Functional changes underlying impaired cognitive flexibility.
酒精、灵活行为与前额叶皮层:认知灵活性受损背后的功能变化
Neuropharmacology. 2024 Dec 1;260:110114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110114. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
4
Amphetamine use disorder is associated with striatum hypoactivation during anticipation of loss and reward.使用苯丙胺类兴奋剂所致障碍与在预期损失和奖励期间纹状体激活不足有关。
J Psychopharmacol. 2024 Mar;38(3):236-246. doi: 10.1177/02698811231222355. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
5
Mindfulness-based stress reduction is linked with an improved Cognitive Reflection Test score.基于正念的减压疗法与认知反思测试分数的提高有关。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 3;14:1272324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272324. eCollection 2023.
6
Impulsivity in amphetamine use disorder: Examination of sex differences.苯丙胺使用障碍中的冲动性:性别差异的考察。
Addiction. 2023 Sep;118(9):1787-1800. doi: 10.1111/add.16225. Epub 2023 May 16.
7
Executive function in methamphetamine users with and without psychosis.精神分裂症和非精神分裂症甲基苯丙胺使用者的执行功能。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Nov;317:114820. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114820. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
8
Lower Levels of Directed Exploration and Reflective Thinking Are Associated With Greater Anxiety and Depression.较低水平的定向探索和反思性思维与更高程度的焦虑和抑郁相关。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 7;12:782136. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.782136. eCollection 2021.
9
Age of Onset and Its Related Factors in Cocaine or Methamphetamine Use in Adults from the United States: Results from NHANES 2005-2018.美国成年人可卡因或甲基苯丙胺使用的发病年龄及其相关因素:来自 NHANES 2005-2018 的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 22;18(22):12259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212259.
10
Computational theory-driven studies of reinforcement learning and decision-making in addiction: What have we learned?成瘾中强化学习与决策的计算理论驱动研究:我们学到了什么?
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Apr;38:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Nov 8.