*Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland †Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland ‡Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1045-1050. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002132.
To explore the added value of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) to standard assessment of postoperative morbidity, and to clarify potential controversies for its application.
The CCI was introduced about 3 years ago as a novel metric of postoperative morbidity, integrating in a single formula all complications by severity, ranging from 0 (uneventful course) to 100 (death). It remains unclear, how often the CCI adds to standard reporting of complications and how to apply it in complex postoperative courses.
CCI data were prospectively collected over a 1-year period at our institution. The proportion of patients with more than 1 complication and the severity of those complications were assessed to determine the additional value of the CCI compared to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Complex and controversial cases were presented to 90 surgeons worldwide to achieve consensus in weighing each postoperative event. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate agreement among surgeons and to suggest solutions for consistent use of the CCI.
Complications were identified in 24% (290/1212) of the general surgical population. Of those, 44% (127/290) developed more than 1 complication by the time of discharge, and thereby CCI added information to the standard grading system of complications. Information gained by the CCI increased with the complexity of surgery and observation time.
The CCI adds information on postoperative morbidity in almost half of the patients developing complications, with particular value following extensive surgery and longer postoperative observation up to 3 months. Each single complication, independently of their inter-connection, should be included in the CCI calculation to best mirror the patients' postoperative morbidity.
探讨综合并发症指数(CCI)对术后发病率标准评估的附加价值,并阐明其应用的潜在争议。
CCI 大约在 3 年前被引入,作为一种新的术后发病率衡量标准,通过严重程度将所有并发症整合到一个公式中,范围从 0(无并发症)到 100(死亡)。目前仍不清楚 CCI 增加了多少标准并发症报告的频率,以及如何在复杂的术后过程中应用它。
CCI 数据在我们机构前瞻性地收集了 1 年。评估患者出现 1 种以上并发症的比例及其严重程度,以确定 CCI 与 Clavien-Dindo 分级相比的附加价值。将复杂和有争议的病例呈现给全球 90 位外科医生,以达成共识,权衡每个术后事件的权重。使用描述性统计来评估外科医生之间的一致性,并提出一致使用 CCI 的解决方案。
普通外科患者中有 24%(290/1212)出现了并发症。其中,44%(127/290)在出院时出现了 1 种以上并发症,因此 CCI 为并发症的标准分级系统提供了附加信息。CCI 获得的信息随着手术的复杂性和观察时间的增加而增加。
CCI 在近一半发生并发症的患者中提供了有关术后发病率的信息,在广泛手术和更长的术后观察期(最长可达 3 个月)时具有特别的价值。CCI 计算中应包括每个单独的并发症,无论它们之间是否有联系,以最好地反映患者的术后发病率。