• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合并发症指数(CCI)比传统的 Clavien-Dindo 分类在根治性胃癌手术中更能敏感地反映并发症情况。

The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a more sensitive complication index than the conventional Clavien-Dindo classification in radical gastric cancer surgery.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University-SMG Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jan;21(1):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0728-3. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10120-017-0728-3
PMID:28597328
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The comprehensive complication index (CCI) integrates all complications of the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) and offers a metric approach to measure morbidity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the CCI at a high-volume center for gastric cancer surgery and to compare the CCI to the conventional CDC.

METHODS

Clinical factors were collected from the prospective complication data of gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy at Seoul National University Hospital from 2013 to 2014. CDC and CCI were calculated, and risk factors were investigated. Correlations and generalized linear models of hospital stay were compared between the CCI and CDC. The complication monitoring model with cumulative sum control-CCI (CUSUM-CCI) was displayed for individual surgeons, for comparisons between surgeons, and for the institution.

RESULTS

From 1660 patients, 583 complications in 424 patients (25.5%) were identified. The rate of CDC grade IIIa or greater was 9.7%, and the overall CCI was 5.8 ± 11.7. Age, gender, Charlson score, combined resection, open method, and total gastrectomy were associated with increased CCI (p < 0.05). The CCI demonstrated a stronger relationship with hospital stay (ρ = 0.721, p < 0.001) than did the CDC (ρ = 0.634, p < 0.001). For prolonged hospital stays (≥30 days), only the CCI showed a moderate correlation (ρ = 0.544, p = 0.024), although the CDC did not. The CUSUM-CCI model displayed dynamic time-event differences in individual and comparison monitoring models. In the institution monitoring model, a gradual decrease in the CCI was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCI is more strongly correlated with postoperative hospital stay than is the conventional CDC. The CUSUM-CCI model can be used for the continuous monitoring of surgical quality.

摘要

背景

综合并发症指数(CCI)综合了 Clavien-Dindo 分类(CDC)的所有并发症,并提供了一种衡量发病率的度量方法。本研究旨在评估高容量胃癌手术中心的 CCI,并将其与传统的 CDC 进行比较。

方法

从 2013 年至 2014 年在首尔国立大学医院接受根治性胃切除术的胃癌患者的前瞻性并发症数据中收集临床因素。计算了 CDC 和 CCI,并调查了危险因素。比较了 CCI 和 CDC 之间的住院时间相关性和广义线性模型。显示了用于单个外科医生、外科医生之间和机构之间比较的累积和控制 CCI(CUSUM-CCI)并发症监测模型。

结果

从 1660 名患者中,在 424 名患者(25.5%)中发现了 583 种并发症。CDC 分级 IIIa 或更高的发生率为 9.7%,总体 CCI 为 5.8±11.7。年龄、性别、Charlson 评分、联合切除术、开放式方法和全胃切除术与 CCI 增加相关(p<0.05)。CCI 与住院时间的相关性(ρ=0.721,p<0.001)强于 CDC(ρ=0.634,p<0.001)。对于住院时间延长(≥30 天),只有 CCI 显示中度相关性(ρ=0.544,p=0.024),而 CDC 没有。CUSUM-CCI 模型显示了个体和比较监测模型中动态时间事件差异。在机构监测模型中,CCI 逐渐下降。

结论

CCI 与术后住院时间的相关性强于传统的 CDC。CUSUM-CCI 模型可用于手术质量的连续监测。

相似文献

1
The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a more sensitive complication index than the conventional Clavien-Dindo classification in radical gastric cancer surgery.综合并发症指数(CCI)比传统的 Clavien-Dindo 分类在根治性胃癌手术中更能敏感地反映并发症情况。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jan;21(1):171-181. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0728-3. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
2
Toward a More Sensitive Endpoint for Assessing Postoperative Complications in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Comparison Between Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC).评估炎症性肠病患者术后并发症的更敏感终点:综合并发症指数(CCI)与 Clavien-Dindo 分类(CDC)的比较。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Sep;22(9):1593-1602. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3786-x. Epub 2018 May 15.
3
The Comprehensive Complication Index versus Clavien-Dindo grading after laparoscopic and open D2-gastrectomy in the multicenter randomized LOGICA-trial.腹腔镜与开腹 D2 胃切除术的综合并发症指数与 Clavien-Dindo 分级:多中心随机 LOGICA 试验。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;49(12):107095. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107095. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
4
The CUSUM curve combined with comprehensive complication index for assessing short-term complications of radical cystectomy.CUSUM 曲线联合综合并发症指数评估根治性膀胱切除术的短期并发症。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Sep;36(9):e24616. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24616. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
5
The Assessment of Complications After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Comparison of Two Scales.主要腹部手术后并发症的评估:两种量表的比较。
J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
6
The prognostic significance of the comprehensive complication index in patients with gastric cancer.胃癌患者综合并发症指数的预后意义。
Surg Today. 2019 Nov;49(11):913-920. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01828-3. Epub 2019 May 30.
7
[Clavien-Dindo classification and risk factors for complications after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[胃癌根治性胃切除术后的Clavien-Dindo分类及并发症危险因素]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;93(46):3667-70.
8
Clinical validation and comparison of the Comprehensive Complication Index and Clavien-Dindo classification in predicting post-operative outcomes after cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.全面并发症指数与Clavien-Dindo分类法在预测晚期卵巢癌肿瘤细胞减灭术后结局中的临床验证与比较
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Feb 6;33(2):263-270. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003998.
9
Comprehensive Complication Index or Clavien-Dindo Classification: Which is Better for Evaluating the Severity of Postoperative Complications Following Pancreatectomy?综合并发症指数或 Clavien-Dindo 分级:哪种方法更适合评估胰腺切除术后术后并发症的严重程度?
World J Surg. 2021 Mar;45(3):849-856. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05859-7. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
10
Evaluation of comprehensive complication index versus Clavien-Dindo classification in prediction of overall survival after radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术后综合并发症指数与Clavien-Dindo分类法对总生存预测的评估
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Jun;55(6):1459-1465. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03564-7. Epub 2023 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of a novel complication reporting system: the comprehensive complication index in thulium laser enucleation of the prostate.一种新型并发症报告系统的应用:前列腺铥激光剜除术中的综合并发症指数
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 19;30(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-03052-x.
2
Perioperative Oral decontamination and ImmunoNuTrition (POINT) to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly patients scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgeries: protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.围手术期口腔去污与免疫营养(POINT)预防择期非心脏手术老年患者术后肺部并发症:一项多中心随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 14;15(5):e092068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092068.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) as a Mortality Predictor after Surgery in Elderly Patients.Charlson合并症指数(CCI)作为老年患者术后死亡率的预测指标
Am Surg. 2016 Jan;82(1):22-7.
2
Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01).与开放性远端胃癌切除术相比,腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术治疗Ⅰ期胃癌的发病率降低:一项多中心随机对照试验(KLASS-01)的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346.
3
A Quantified Scoring System for Postoperative Complication Severity Compared to the Clavien-Dindo Classification.
Estimating the Morbidity of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Using the Comprehensive Complication Index: Data from the Asian Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Consortium.
使用综合并发症指数评估机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的发病率:来自亚洲机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联盟的数据。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 29;17(7):1157. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071157.
4
Investigating the Effects of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery on Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Its Relationship With Smoking.研究代谢与减重手术对全身免疫炎症指数的影响及其与吸烟的关系。
World J Surg. 2025 Mar;49(3):559-569. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12499. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
5
Development and validation of a preoperative prediction model for geriatric emergency general surgery.老年急诊普通外科手术术前预测模型的开发与验证
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jan 20;410(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03610-1.
6
How to measure quality of surgery as a component of multimodality treatment of gastric cancer.如何衡量作为胃癌多模式治疗组成部分的手术质量。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Jun 12;8(5):740-749. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12833. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Functional outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with three-dimensional images reconstructed from computed tomography: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis.基于 CT 重建三维图像的机器人辅助部分肾切除术的功能学结果:倾向评分匹配的对比分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 7;18(1):314. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02070-x.
8
The Comprehensive Complication Index in Ulcerative Colitis: A Comparison with the Clavien-Dindo Classification.溃疡性结肠炎的综合并发症指数:与Clavien-Dindo分类法的比较
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2024 Mar 8;9(1):85-95. doi: 10.1159/000538180. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Defining benchmarks for total and distal gastrectomy: global multicentre analysis.全胃切除术和远端胃切除术的基准定义:全球多中心分析
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 31;111(2). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad379.
10
Risk factors for death from other diseases after curative gastrectomy and lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.胃癌根治术及淋巴结清扫术后其他疾病死亡的危险因素。
BMC Surg. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02313-6.
与Clavien-Dindo分类法相比的术后并发症严重程度量化评分系统。
Dig Surg. 2015;32(5):361-6. doi: 10.1159/000433608. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
4
A comparison of the recording of comorbidity in primary and secondary care by using the Charlson Index to predict short-term and long-term survival in a routine linked data cohort.在一个常规关联数据队列中,利用查尔森指数比较初级保健和二级保健中合并症的记录情况,以预测短期和长期生存率。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 5;5(6):e007974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007974.
5
A scoring system to predict the risk of postoperative complications after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on a large-scale retrospective study.基于一项大规模回顾性研究的预测胃癌腹腔镜胃切除术后并发症风险的评分系统。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(17):e812. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000812.
6
Comprehensive complication index for NOTES procedures: results from a randomized controlled trial and comparison to published NOTES complication data.经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)的综合并发症指数:一项随机对照试验的结果及与已发表的NOTES并发症数据的比较
Surg Endosc. 2015 Oct;29(10):2928-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4023-7. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
7
The comprehensive complication index: a novel and more sensitive endpoint for assessing outcome and reducing sample size in randomized controlled trials.综合并发症指数:一种评估结局和减少随机对照试验样本量的新的、更敏感的终点。
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):757-62; discussion 762-3. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000948.
8
Risk factors associated with complication following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data based on the Clavien-Dindo system.胃癌胃切除术后并发症的相关危险因素:基于Clavien-Dindo系统对前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jul;18(7):1269-77. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2525-1. Epub 2014 May 13.
9
Complications in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery according to case type: a 6-year retrospective cohort study using Clavien-Dindo classification.根据病例类型分析机器人辅助妇科手术的并发症:一项使用Clavien-Dindo分类法的6年回顾性队列研究
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):844-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
10
Cancer-specific administrative data-based comorbidity indices provided valid alternative to Charlson and National Cancer Institute Indices.基于癌症特定的管理数据的合并症指数为 Charlson 和国家癌症研究所指数提供了有效的替代方案。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):586-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.012. Epub 2014 Feb 25.