• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.2008 - 2013年美国住院产后长效可逆避孕与绝育情况
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):1078-1085. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001970.
2
Update on incidence of inpatient tubal ligation and long-acting reversible contraception in the United States.美国住院输卵管结扎和长效可逆避孕措施发病率的最新情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):477.e1-477.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.021. Epub 2022 May 13.
3
Changes in Rates of Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the USA, 2012-2016.美国 2012-2016 年住院产妇长效可逆避孕和绝育率的变化。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Oct;25(10):1562-1573. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03152-0. Epub 2021 May 10.
4
Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.产后避孕:大型全民医疗保健系统中的起始情况与有效性
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):55.e1-55.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.036. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
5
Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Placement Among Active-Duty U.S. Army Servicewomen.美国现役陆军女兵长效可逆避孕措施的应用情况
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):800-809. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001971.
6
Postpartum intrauterine device insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization in the United States.美国的产后宫内节育器放置和产后输卵管绝育术。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;206(2):127.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
7
Cost Sharing and Utilization of Postpartum Intrauterine Devices and Contraceptive Implants Among Commercially Insured Women.商业保险女性产后宫内节育器和避孕植入物的费用分担和利用。
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Nov-Dec;29(6):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
Factors associated with postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception.与产后使用长效可逆避孕措施相关的因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):43.e1-43.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
9
Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval in women who plan postpartum LARC: a retrospective study.计划产后长效可逆避孕方法的女性中与妊娠间隔短相关的因素:一项回顾性研究
Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):245-250. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
10
Patients' Experiences with an Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Program.患者对即刻产后长效可逆避孕项目的体验。
Womens Health Issues. 2021 Mar-Apr;31(2):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Postpartum Patient Perspectives on the US Medicaid Waiting Period for Permanent Contraception.产后患者对美国医疗补助计划中永久避孕等待期的看法。
Open Access J Contracept. 2025 Feb 25;16:31-41. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S506703. eCollection 2025.
2
Pennsylvania Medicaid policy and rural hospital implementation of immediate postpartum contraception.宾夕法尼亚州医疗补助政策及农村医院产后即时避孕措施的实施情况
Contraception. 2025 Jun;146:110858. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110858. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
3
Association of Opioid Use Disorder and Provision of Highly Effective Inpatient Postpartum Contraception.阿片类物质使用障碍与高效住院产后避孕措施的提供之间的关联
Open Access J Contracept. 2023 Jun 20;14:95-102. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S411092. eCollection 2023.
4
Decision-making regarding immediate vs. interval postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion timing.关于产后立即放置左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器与间隔放置时间的决策。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2023 Mar 20;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40834-023-00221-3.
5
Uptake of postplacental intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery.剖宫产时放置产后宫内节育器的情况。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Jan 4;3(1):100157. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100157. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use Following State-Specific Changes in Hospital Medicaid Reimbursement.州内医疗补助报销政策变化后即刻产后长效可逆避孕措施的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2237918. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37918.
7
Obstetrician-Gynecologists' Practices in Postpartum Sterilization Without a Valid Medicaid Consent Form.妇产科医生在没有有效医疗补助同意书的情况下进行产后绝育的做法。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul 1;138(1):66-72. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004413.
8
Analysis of Postpartum Uptake of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Before and After Implementation of Medicaid Reimbursement Policy.分析医疗补助报销政策实施前后长效可逆避孕药的产后使用情况。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Sep;25(9):1361-1368. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03180-w. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
9
Changes in Rates of Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the USA, 2012-2016.美国 2012-2016 年住院产妇长效可逆避孕和绝育率的变化。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Oct;25(10):1562-1573. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03152-0. Epub 2021 May 10.
10
Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals.实施产后即时避孕:11家医院的比较案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Apr 12;2(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00136-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Programs.实施即刻产后长效可逆避孕方案。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;129(1):3-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001798.
2
Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: the time is now.产后立即使用长效可逆避孕法:时机已到。
Contraception. 2017 Apr;95(4):335-338. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
3
Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval in women who plan postpartum LARC: a retrospective study.计划产后长效可逆避孕方法的女性中与妊娠间隔短相关的因素:一项回顾性研究
Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):245-250. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
4
U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016.美国避孕方法医学适用标准,2016 年版。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Jul 29;65(3):1-103. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1.
5
Committee Opinion No. 670: Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.委员会意见第 670 号:产后即刻长效可逆避孕。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;128(2):e32-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001587.
6
Medicaid Administrator Experiences with the Implementation of Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.医疗补助计划管理人员在实施产后即时长效可逆避孕措施方面的经验。
Womens Health Issues. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
7
Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception.产后即时避孕的医疗补助政策特征分析
Contraception. 2015 Dec;92(6):523-31. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
8
Changes in Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Women, 2009-2012.2009 - 2012年美国女性长效可逆避孕方法的使用变化
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;126(5):917-927. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001094.
9
Working with State Health Departments on Emerging Issues in Maternal and Child Health: Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives.与州卫生部门合作应对母婴健康领域的新问题:产后即时长效可逆避孕措施
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Sep;24(9):693-701. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5401.
10
Trends and Disparities in Postpartum Sterilization after Cesarean Section, 2000 through 2008.2000年至2008年剖宫产术后绝育的趋势与差异
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):634-40. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

2008 - 2013年美国住院产后长效可逆避孕与绝育情况

Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.

作者信息

Moniz Michelle H, Chang Tammy, Heisler Michele, Admon Lindsay, Gebremariam Acham, Dalton Vanessa K, Davis Matthew M

机构信息

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Communicable Diseases, the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, and the School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and the Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):1078-1085. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001970.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001970
PMID:28486357
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5508209/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure rates of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), including intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants, and tubal sterilization during delivery hospitalizations and correlates of their use.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the 2008-2013 National Inpatient Sample, a publicly available all-payer database. We identified delivery hospitalizations with the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes for intrauterine device insertion, contraceptive implant insertion, and tubal sterilization. We used weighted multivariable logistic regression to examine associations between predictors (age, delivery mode, medical comorbidity, payer, hospital type, geographic region, and year) and likelihood of LARC and sterilization and to compare characteristics of LARC and sterilization users.

RESULTS

Our sample included 4,691,683 discharges, representing 22,667,204 delivery hospitalizations. Long-acting reversible contraception insertion increased from 1.86 per 10,000 deliveries (2008-2009) to 13.5 per 10,000 deliveries (2012-2013; P<.001); tubal sterilization remained stable (711-683 per 10,000 deliveries; P=.24). In multivariable analysis adjusting for all predictors, compared with neither LARC nor sterilization, LARC use was highest among women with medical comorbidities (count per 10,000 deliveries: 15.04, standard error 2.11, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72-2.13), nonprivate payer (13.50, standard error 2.14, adjusted OR 5.23, 95% CI 3.82-7.16), and at urban teaching hospitals (14.92, standard error 2.25, adjusted OR 20.85, 95% CI 12.73-34.15). Sterilization was least likely among women aged 24 years or younger (251.04, standard error 4.88, adjusted OR 0.12 95% CI 0.12-0.13, compared with 35 years or older) and most likely with cesarean delivery (1,568.74, standard error 20.81, adjusted OR 6.25, 95% CI 5.88-6.63). Comparing only LARC and sterilization users, LARC users tended to have nonprivate insurance (84.95% compared with 57.17%, adjusted OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.38-2.63) and deliver at urban teaching hospitals (94.65% compared with 45.47%, adjusted OR 38.39, 23.52-62.64) in later study years (2012-2013; 55.72% compared with 32.18%, adjusted OR 8.26, 95% CI 4.42-15.44, compared with 2008-2009).

CONCLUSION

Long-acting reversible contraception insertion increased from 1.86 to 13.5 per 10,000 deliveries but remained less than 2% of the sterilization rate. Inpatient postpartum LARC insertion is more likely among sicker, poorer women delivering at urban teaching hospitals.

摘要

目的

测量长效可逆避孕方法(LARC,包括宫内节育器和避孕植入物)的使用率以及分娩住院期间输卵管绝育术的使用率及其使用的相关因素。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究使用了2008 - 2013年全国住院患者样本,这是一个公开可用的全付费者数据库。我们通过国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本编码识别出进行宫内节育器放置、避孕植入物放置和输卵管绝育术的分娩住院病例。我们使用加权多变量逻辑回归来检验预测因素(年龄、分娩方式、合并症、付费者、医院类型、地理区域和年份)与LARC和绝育术使用可能性之间的关联,并比较LARC和绝育术使用者的特征。

结果

我们的样本包括4,691,683例出院病例,代表22,667,204例分娩住院病例。长效可逆避孕方法的放置率从每10,000例分娩1.86例(2008 - 2009年)增加到每万例分娩13.5例(2012 - 2013年;P <.001);输卵管绝育术保持稳定(每10,000例分娩711 - 683例;P =.24)。在对所有预测因素进行调整的多变量分析中,与既未使用LARC也未进行绝育术的女性相比,合并症女性使用LARC的比例最高(每10,000例分娩计数:15 .04,标准误2.11,调整后的比值比[OR] 1.92,95%置信区间[CI] 1.72 - 2.13),非私人付费者(13.50,标准误2.14,调整后的OR 5.23,95% CI 3.82 - 7.16),以及在城市教学医院(14.92,标准误2.25,调整后的OR 20.85,95% CI 12.73 - 34.15)。24岁及以下女性进行绝育术的可能性最小(251.04,标准误4 .88,调整后的OR 0.12 , 95% CI 0.12 - 0 .13,与35岁及以上女性相比),而剖宫产分娩的女性进行绝育术的可能性最大(1,568.74,标准误 - 20.81,调整后的OR 6.25,95% CI 5.88 - 6.63)。仅比较LARC和绝育术使用者,在后期研究年份(2012年 - - 2013年;分别为55. .72%和32.18%,调整后的OR 8.26,95% CI - 4.42 - 15.44,与2008 - - - - - - 2009 - - - - - -年相比),LARC使用者更倾向于拥有非私人保险(84.95% 相比于57.17%,调整后的OR - 1.90,95% CI 1.38 - 2.63)并且在城市教学医院分娩(94.65% 相比于45.47%,调整后的OR 38.3 - 9,23 .52 - 62.64)。

结论

长效可逆避孕方法的放置率从每10,000例分娩1.86例增加到13.5例,但仍低于绝育率的2%。在城市教学医院分娩的病情较重且贫困的女性更有可能在住院产后使用LARC。