• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000年至2008年剖宫产术后绝育的趋势与差异

Trends and Disparities in Postpartum Sterilization after Cesarean Section, 2000 through 2008.

作者信息

Garcia Ginny, Richardson Dawn M, Gonzales Kelly L, Cuevas Adolfo G

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.

School of Community Health, College of Urban and Public Affairs, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):634-40. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2015.07.006
PMID:26329256
Abstract

PURPOSE

Tubal sterilization patterns are influenced by factors including patient race, ethnicity, level of education, method of payment, and hospital size and affiliation. However, less is known about how these factors influence tubal sterilizations performed as secondary procedures after cesarean sections (C-sections). Thus, this study examines variations in the prevalence of postpartum tubal sterilizations after C-sections from 2000 to 2008.

METHODS

We used data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey to estimate odds ratios for patient-level (race, marital status, age) and system-level (hospital size, type, region) factors on the likelihood of receiving tubal sterilization after C-section.

RESULTS

A disproportionate share of postpartum tubal sterilizations after C-section was covered by Medicaid. The likelihood of undergoing sterilization was increased for Black women, women of older age, and non-single women. Additionally, they were increased in proprietary and government hospitals, smaller hospital settings, and the Southern United States.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that Black women and those with Medicaid coverage in particular were substantially more likely to undergo postpartum tubal sterilization after C-section. We also found that hospital characteristics and region were significant predictors. This adds to the growing body of evidence that suggests that tubal sterilization may be a disparity issue patterned by multiple factors and calls for greater understanding of the role of patient-, provider-, and system-level characteristics on such outcomes.

摘要

目的

输卵管绝育模式受到多种因素影响,包括患者种族、民族、教育程度、支付方式以及医院规模和所属机构。然而,对于这些因素如何影响剖宫产术后作为二次手术进行的输卵管绝育,人们了解较少。因此,本研究调查了2000年至2008年剖宫产术后产后输卵管绝育患病率的差异。

方法

我们使用了国家医院出院调查的数据,以估计患者层面(种族、婚姻状况、年龄)和系统层面(医院规模、类型、地区)因素对剖宫产术后接受输卵管绝育可能性的比值比。

结果

剖宫产术后产后输卵管绝育中,由医疗补助计划覆盖的比例过高。黑人女性、年龄较大的女性以及非单身女性接受绝育的可能性增加。此外,在私立和政府医院、规模较小的医院环境以及美国南部,接受绝育的可能性也增加。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,黑人女性尤其是那些有医疗补助计划覆盖的女性,在剖宫产术后接受产后输卵管绝育的可能性显著更高。我们还发现医院特征和地区是重要的预测因素。这进一步证明了输卵管绝育可能是一个受多种因素影响的差异问题,需要更深入地了解患者、提供者和系统层面特征在此类结果中的作用。

相似文献

1
Trends and Disparities in Postpartum Sterilization after Cesarean Section, 2000 through 2008.2000年至2008年剖宫产术后绝育的趋势与差异
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Nov-Dec;25(6):634-40. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
2
Hospital variation in postpartum tubal sterilization rates in California and Texas.加利福尼亚州和得克萨斯州产后输卵管绝育率的医院差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):152-8. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318278f241.
3
Desired Sterilization Procedure at the Time of Cesarean Delivery According to Insurance Status.根据保险状况在剖宫产时选择的绝育手术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;134(6):1171-1177. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003552.
4
Racial Disparities in Sterilization Procedure Performed at Time of Cesarean Section.剖宫产时实施绝育手术的种族差异。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e934-e938. doi: 10.1055/a-1974-9507. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
Tubal sterilization in the United States, 1994-1996.1994 - 1996年美国的输卵管绝育术
Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Jul-Aug;33(4):161-5.
6
Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization.种族、保险状况及输卵管绝育术
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):94-100. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249604.78234.d3.
7
Reconsidering racial/ethnic differences in sterilization in the United States.重新审视美国绝育方面的种族/族裔差异。
Contraception. 2014 Jun;89(6):550-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
8
The impact of laparoscopy on tubal sterilization in United States hospitals, 1970 and 1975 to 1978.1970年以及1975年至1978年期间腹腔镜检查对美国医院输卵管绝育术的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Aug 1;140(7):811-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90745-6.
9
Postpartum intrauterine device insertion and postpartum tubal sterilization in the United States.美国的产后宫内节育器放置和产后输卵管绝育术。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;206(2):127.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
10
Trends in sterilization since the introduction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization.自埃苏瑞宫腔镜绝育术推出以来的绝育趋势。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jan-Feb;16(1):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.08.017. Epub 2008 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Postpartum Health Disparities During the Birth Hospitalization in the United States: A Scoping Review.美国分娩住院期间的产后健康差异:一项范围综述
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02487-6.
2
Moving toward Narrowing the United States Gap in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Next Decade.在未来十年缩小美国辅助生殖技术(ART)领域种族和族裔差异差距的进展
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 11;13(8):2224. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082224.
3
Does socioeconomic factors and healthcare coverage affect postpartum sterilization uptake in an urban, tertiary hospital?
社会经济因素和医疗保健覆盖情况是否会影响城市三级医院的产后绝育率?
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01572-5.
4
Implicit Bias in Counseling for Permanent Contraception: Historical Context and Recommendations for Counseling.永久性避孕咨询中的隐性偏见:历史背景与咨询建议
Health Equity. 2020 Jul 17;4(1):326-329. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0025. eCollection 2020.
5
Recommendations for Contraception: Examining the Role of Patients' Age and Race.避孕建议:审视患者年龄与种族的作用
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2018 Jan;77(1):7-13.
6
Inpatient Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception and Sterilization in the United States, 2008-2013.2008 - 2013年美国住院产后长效可逆避孕与绝育情况
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):1078-1085. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001970.