• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过改造贫困社区改善心理健康:一项自然实验。

Improving Mental Health Through the Regeneration of Deprived Neighborhoods: A Natural Experiment.

作者信息

White James, Greene Giles, Farewell Daniel, Dunstan Frank, Rodgers Sarah, Lyons Ronan A, Humphreys Ioan, John Ann, Webster Chris, Phillips Ceri J, Fone David

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 15;186(4):473-480. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx086.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwx086
PMID:28486637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5860549/
Abstract

Neighborhood-level interventions provide an opportunity to better understand the impact of neighborhoods on health. In 2001, the Welsh Government, United Kingdom, funded Communities First, a program of neighborhood regeneration delivered to the 100 most deprived of the 881 electoral wards in Wales. In this study, we examined the association between neighborhood regeneration and mental health. Information on regeneration activities in 35 intervention areas (n = 4,197 subjects) and 75 control areas (n = 6,695 subjects) was linked to data on mental health from a cohort study with assessments made in 2001 (before regeneration) and 2008 (after regeneration). Propensity score matching was used to estimate the change in mental health in intervention neighborhoods versus control neighborhoods. Baseline differences between intervention and control areas were of similar magnitude as produced by paired randomization of neighborhoods. Regeneration was associated with an improvement in the mental health of residents in intervention areas compared with control neighborhoods (β = 1.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.50, 2.59), suggesting a reduction in socioeconomic inequalities in mental health. There was a dose-response relationship between length of residence in regeneration neighborhoods and improvements in mental health (P-trend = 0.05). These results show that targeted regeneration of deprived neighborhoods can improve mental health.

摘要

社区层面的干预措施为更好地理解社区对健康的影响提供了契机。2001年,英国威尔士政府资助了“优先社区”项目,该项目是一项社区复兴计划,覆盖了威尔士881个选区中最贫困的100个选区。在本研究中,我们考察了社区复兴与心理健康之间的关联。将35个干预区域(n = 4197名受试者)和75个对照区域(n = 6695名受试者)的复兴活动信息与一项队列研究中的心理健康数据相联系,该队列研究在2001年(复兴前)和2008年(复兴后)进行了评估。倾向得分匹配法用于估计干预社区与对照社区心理健康状况的变化。干预区域与对照区域之间的基线差异幅度与社区配对随机分组所产生的差异相似。与对照社区相比,复兴与干预区域居民心理健康状况的改善相关(β = 1.54,95%置信区间:0.50,2.59),这表明心理健康方面的社会经济不平等有所减少。在复兴社区的居住时长与心理健康改善之间存在剂量反应关系(P趋势 = 0.05)。这些结果表明,对贫困社区进行有针对性的复兴可改善心理健康。

相似文献

1
Improving Mental Health Through the Regeneration of Deprived Neighborhoods: A Natural Experiment.通过改造贫困社区改善心理健康:一项自然实验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 15;186(4):473-480. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx086.
2
Reducing violence by transforming neighborhoods: a natural experiment in Medellín, Colombia.通过改造社区减少暴力:哥伦比亚麦德林的自然实验。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 May 15;175(10):1045-53. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr428. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
3
The communities first (ComFi) study: protocol for a prospective controlled quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact of area-wide regeneration on mental health and social cohesion in deprived communities.社区优先(ComFi)研究:一项前瞻性对照准实验研究的方案,旨在评估区域全面复兴对贫困社区心理健康和社会凝聚力的影响。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 14;4(10):e006530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006530.
4
Neighborhood residence and mental health problems of 5- to 11-year-olds.5至11岁儿童的邻里居住环境与心理健康问题
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 May;62(5):554-63. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.5.554.
5
Aging in Place in Gentrifying Neighborhoods: Implications for Physical and Mental Health.在高档化社区中就地老龄化:对身心健康的影响。
Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(1):26-35. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx105.
6
Moving to opportunity and mental health: Exploring the spatial context of neighborhood effects.迁居与心理健康:探索邻里效应的空间背景
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;162:50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.036. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
The right to the unhealthy deprived city: An exploration into the impacts of state-led redevelopment projects on the determinants of mental health.被剥夺健康权的城市:国家主导的重建项目对心理健康决定因素影响的探索。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Feb;318:115634. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115634. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
8
Health effects of neighborhood demolition and housing improvement: a prospective controlled study of 2 natural experiments in urban renewal.社区拆迁和住房改善对健康的影响:城市更新中 2 个自然实验的前瞻性对照研究。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):e47-53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301275. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
9
Neighborhood material versus social deprivation in Canada: different patterns of associations with child and adolescent mental health problems.加拿大邻里物质匮乏与社会剥夺:与儿童及青少年心理健康问题的不同关联模式
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;60(4):823-836. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02681-7. Epub 2024 May 5.
10
School neighborhood disadvantage as a predictor of long-term sick leave among teachers: prospective cohort study.学校周边劣势与教师长期病假的相关性:前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr 1;171(7):785-92. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp459. Epub 2010 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventing depression in high-income countries-A systematic review of studies evaluating change in social determinants.高收入国家抑郁症的预防——对评估社会决定因素变化的研究的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0323378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323378. eCollection 2025.
2
Redeveloping Low-Income Communities and Residents' Mental Health: Evidence From a Natural Experiment in Watts, Los Angeles.重建低收入社区与居民心理健康:来自洛杉矶瓦茨自然实验的证据
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jul;69(1):107631. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.04.001. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
3
Understanding the Effects of Social Cohesion on Social Wellbeing: A Scoping Review.理解社会凝聚力对社会福祉的影响:一项范围综述
Int J Public Health. 2025 Jan 30;70:1607414. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1607414. eCollection 2025.
4
Short-term health effects of an urban regeneration programme in deprived neighbourhoods of Barcelona.巴塞罗那贫困社区城市更新计划的短期健康影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0300470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300470. eCollection 2024.
5
Neighborhood Resource Deprivation as a Predictor of Bullying Perpetration and Resource-Driven Conduct Symptoms.邻里资源匮乏作为欺凌行为和资源驱动型行为症状的预测指标
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;64(1):53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.03.008. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Views on sharing mental health data for research purposes: qualitative analysis of interviews with people with mental illness.对于研究目的共享心理健康数据的看法:对精神病患者访谈的定性分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 14;24(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00961-6.
7
Impact of selective licensing schemes for private rental housing on mental health and social outcomes in Greater London, England: a natural experiment study.英格兰大伦敦地区私人出租住房选择性许可方案对心理健康和社会结果的影响:一项自然实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 23;12(12):e065747. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065747.
8
Gender Disparities Between Neighborhood Social Vulnerability and Psychological Distress Among Patients with Heart Disease.社区社会脆弱性与心脏病患者心理困扰之间的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Oct;31(10):1440-1449. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0505. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
9
The effects of neighbourhood social cohesion on preventing depression and anxiety among adolescents and young adults: rapid review.邻里社会凝聚力对预防青少年和青年抑郁与焦虑的影响:快速综述
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jun 1;8(4):e97. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.57.
10
Cohort Profile: The Green and Blue Spaces (GBS) and mental health in Wales e-cohort.队列简介:威尔士绿色与蓝色空间(GBS)与心理健康电子队列
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 13;51(5):e285-e294. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac080.

本文引用的文献

1
Proportionate universalism in practice? A quasi-experimental study (GoWell) of a UK neighbourhood renewal programme's impact on health inequalities.实践中的相称普遍主义?一项关于英国社区复兴计划对健康不平等影响的准实验研究(GoWell)。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Mar;152:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.026. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
2
Health trajectories in regeneration areas in England: the impact of the New Deal for Communities intervention.英格兰再生区域的健康轨迹:社区新政干预措施的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Aug;69(8):762-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204362. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
3
The communities first (ComFi) study: protocol for a prospective controlled quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact of area-wide regeneration on mental health and social cohesion in deprived communities.社区优先(ComFi)研究:一项前瞻性对照准实验研究的方案,旨在评估区域全面复兴对贫困社区心理健康和社会凝聚力的影响。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 14;4(10):e006530. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006530.
4
Evaluating the health inequalities impact of area-based initiatives across the socioeconomic spectrum: a controlled intervention study of the New Deal for Communities, 2002-2008.评估基于地区的举措对社会经济各阶层健康不平等状况的影响:2002 - 2008年社区新政的对照干预研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Oct;68(10):979-86. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-203902. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
5
Effect of neighbourhood deprivation and social cohesion on mental health inequality: a multilevel population-based longitudinal study.邻里贫困和社会凝聚力对心理健康不平等的影响:一项基于人群的多层次纵向研究。
Psychol Med. 2014 Aug;44(11):2449-60. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713003255. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
6
Health effects of neighborhood demolition and housing improvement: a prospective controlled study of 2 natural experiments in urban renewal.社区拆迁和住房改善对健康的影响:城市更新中 2 个自然实验的前瞻性对照研究。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):e47-53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301275. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
7
Cohort profile: the Caerphilly health and social needs electronic cohort study (E-CATALyST).队列简介:卡菲利健康与社会需求电子队列研究(E-CATALyST)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1620-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys175. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
8
Crime, fear of crime, environment, and mental health and wellbeing: mapping review of theories and causal pathways.犯罪、犯罪恐惧、环境以及心理健康和幸福:理论和因果途径的制图综述。
Health Place. 2012 Jul;18(4):757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
9
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
10
Protocol for a mixed methods study investigating the impact of investment in housing, regeneration and neighbourhood renewal on the health and wellbeing of residents: the GoWell programme.一项混合方法研究的方案,旨在调查投资住房、再生和社区更新对居民健康和福利的影响:GoWell 计划。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 May 11;10:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-41.