Comparison of endovascular repair with branched stent graft and open repair for aortic arch aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES

Although conventional open repair is our preference for patients with aortic arch aneurysms, we have often chosen thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) with a handmade branched stent graft (bTEVAR) in high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare the midterm clinical outcomes of our bTEVAR technique to those of the open repair.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2014, we treated 129 patients with aortic arch aneurysm by means of either conventional open repair (OPEN, n = 61) or bTEVAR (n = 68) at our institution.

RESULTS

The mean ages were 70.5 ± 12.7 years in the OPEN group and 72.7 ± 12.5 years in the bTEVAR group (P = 0.32). The aetiologies included true aneurysm in 101 patients (78.3%) and chronic dissection in 26 (20.1%). There were 2 (3.3%) in-hospital deaths in the OPEN group and 3 (4.4%) in the bTEVAR group. The mean follow-up duration was 3.0 ± 2.1 years (2.4 ± 1.9 years in the OPEN group and 3.6 ± 2.3 years in the bTEVAR group). There was no difference in 5-year aneurysm-related mortality between groups (10.7% in OPEN vs 12.8% in bTEVAR, P = 0.50). In terms of late additional procedures, however, none were required in the OPEN group, whereas 10 (15.4%) additional endovascular repairs and 4 (6.2%) open repairs were required in the bTEVAR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our bTEVAR could be performed with low early mortality, and it yielded similar midterm aneurysm-related mortality to that of conventional open repair. However, these patients undergoing this technique required more late additional procedures than those undergoing conventional open repair.