Gasparutto Xavier, Moissenet Florent, Lafon Yoann, Chèze Laurence, Dumas Raphaël
University Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, 69622 Lyon, France.
Centre National de Rééducation Fonctionnelle et de Réadaptation-Rehazenter, Laboratoire d'Analyse du Mouvement et de la Posture (LAMP), Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017;2017:1908618. doi: 10.1155/2017/1908618. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
Few studies have provided in vivo tibiofemoral kinematics of the normal knee during dynamic weight-bearing activities. Indeed, gold standard measurement methods (i.e., intracortical pins and biplane imaging) raise ethical and experimental issues. Moreover, the conventions used for the processing of the kinematics show large inconsistencies. This study aims at synthesising the tibiofemoral kinematics measured with gold standard measurement methods. Published kinematic data were transformed in the standard recommended by the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB), and a clustering method was applied to investigate whether the couplings between the degrees of freedom (DoFs) are consistent among the different activities and measurement methods. The synthesised couplings between the DoFs during knee flexion (from 4° of extension to -61° of flexion) included abduction (up to -10°); internal rotation (up to 15°); and medial (up to 10 mm), anterior (up to 25 mm), and proximal (up to 28 mm) displacements. These synthesised couplings appeared mainly partitioned into two clusters that featured all the dynamic weight-bearing activities and all the measurement methods. Thus, the effect of the dynamic activities on the couplings between the tibiofemoral DoFs appeared to be limited. The synthesised data might be used as a reference of normal in vivo knee kinematics for prosthetic and orthotic design and for knee biomechanical model development and validation.
很少有研究提供正常膝关节在动态负重活动期间的体内胫股关节运动学数据。实际上,金标准测量方法(即皮质内钢针和双平面成像)存在伦理和实验方面的问题。此外,用于处理运动学数据的惯例存在很大的不一致性。本研究旨在综合用金标准测量方法测得的胫股关节运动学数据。已发表的运动学数据按照国际生物力学学会(ISB)推荐的标准进行转换,并应用聚类方法来研究不同活动和测量方法之间自由度(DoF)的耦合是否一致。膝关节屈伸过程中(从伸展4°到屈曲61°)自由度之间的综合耦合包括外展(最大10°)、内旋(最大15°)以及内侧(最大10毫米)、前方(最大25毫米)和近端(最大28毫米)位移。这些综合耦合主要分为两类,涵盖了所有动态负重活动和所有测量方法。因此,动态活动对胫股关节自由度之间耦合的影响似乎有限。综合数据可作为体内正常膝关节运动学的参考,用于假肢和矫形器设计以及膝关节生物力学模型的开发和验证。