• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童权力的空间表征。

The spatial representation of power in children.

作者信息

Lu Lifeng, Schubert Thomas W, Zhu Lei

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Fudan University, Handan Road 220, Shanghai, SH, 200433, People's Republic of China.

Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, P.O Box 1094, Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Cogn Process. 2017 Nov;18(4):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0814-9. Epub 2017 May 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10339-017-0814-9
PMID:28488053
Abstract

Previous evidence demonstrates that power is mentally represented as vertical space by adults. However, little is known about how power is mentally represented in children. The current research examines such representations. The influence of vertical information (motor cues) was tested in both an explicit power evaluation task (judge whether labels refer to powerless or powerful groups) and an incidental task (judge whether labels refer to people or animals). The results showed that when power was explicitly evaluated, vertical motor responses interfered with responding in children and adults, i.e., they responded to words representing powerful groups faster with the up than the down cursor key (and vice versa for powerless groups). However, this interference effect disappeared in the incidental task in children. The findings suggest that children have developed a spatial representation of power before they have been taught power-space associations formally, but that they do not judge power spontaneously.

摘要

先前的证据表明,成年人会将权力在心理上表征为垂直空间。然而,对于儿童如何在心理上表征权力却知之甚少。当前的研究考察了此类表征。在一项明确的权力评估任务(判断标签所指的是无权群体还是有权群体)和一项附带任务(判断标签所指的是人还是动物)中,均测试了垂直信息(动作线索)的影响。结果显示,当对权力进行明确评估时,垂直动作反应会干扰儿童和成年人的反应,即他们使用向上光标键对代表有权群体的词语做出反应的速度比对代表无权群体的词语做出反应的速度更快(反之亦然)。然而,这种干扰效应在儿童的附带任务中消失了。研究结果表明,儿童在正式学习权力与空间的关联之前就已经形成了权力的空间表征,但他们不会自发地判断权力。

相似文献

1
The spatial representation of power in children.儿童权力的空间表征。
Cogn Process. 2017 Nov;18(4):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0814-9. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
Development of spatial representation of power in children.儿童权力的空间表现的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:239-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 May 10.
3
The influence of vertical motor responses on explicit and incidental processing of power words.垂直运动反应对权力词汇的显性和附带加工的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Jul;34:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
4
Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of power-space interactions.言语-空间和视空间编码的权力-空间相互作用。
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Aug;63:151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 10.
5
Vertical position of Chinese power words influences power judgments: Evidence from spatial compatibility task and event-related Potentials.中文权势词汇的垂直位置影响权势判断:来自空间兼容性任务和事件相关电位的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Apr;102:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
6
Mighty metaphors: behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension.强大的隐喻:行为和 ERP 证据表明权力在垂直维度上转移了注意力。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Feb;78(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
7
Is power-space a continuum? Distance effect during power judgments.权力空间是一个连续体吗?权力判断过程中的距离效应。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec;37:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
8
What information is critical to elicit interference in number-form synaesthesia?要引发数字形式联觉,哪些信息至关重要?
Cortex. 2009 Nov-Dec;45(10):1200-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.011. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
9
The cognitive mechanisms of the power-space associations: an individual differences approach.权力-空间联想的认知机制:个体差异研究法。
J Gen Psychol. 2020 Jul-Sep;147(3):244-260. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2019.1690972. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
10
Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space.隐喻一致效应中的极性对应:结构重叠预测了在垂直空间中呈现的两极概念的分类时间。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 May;38(3):726-36. doi: 10.1037/a0024955. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Visuospatial or verbal-spatial codes? The different effect of two secondary tasks on the power-space associations during a semantic categorizing task.视空间或言语-空间代码?在语义分类任务中,两种次要任务对力-空间联想的不同影响。
Cogn Process. 2023 Nov;24(4):481-493. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01149-x. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
2
Children's use of race and gender as cues to social status.儿童使用种族和性别作为社会地位的线索。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0234398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234398. eCollection 2020.
3
Space and rank: infants expect agents in higher position to be socially dominant.

本文引用的文献

1
Is power-space a continuum? Distance effect during power judgments.权力空间是一个连续体吗?权力判断过程中的距离效应。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec;37:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
2
The influence of vertical motor responses on explicit and incidental processing of power words.垂直运动反应对权力词汇的显性和附带加工的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Jul;34:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
Children use nonverbal cues to make inferences about social power.儿童利用非语言线索对社会权力进行推断。
空间和地位:婴儿期望处于更高位置的主体具有社会支配地位。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Oct 9;286(1912):20191674. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1674.
Child Dev. 2015 Jan-Feb;86(1):276-86. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12334. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
4
Neural substrates of social status inference: roles of medial prefrontal cortex and superior temporal sulcus.社会地位推断的神经基础:内侧前额叶皮质和颞上沟的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 May;26(5):1131-40. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00553. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
5
Conceptual metaphorical mapping in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)中的概念隐喻映射。
Elife. 2013 Oct 22;2:e00932. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00932.
6
Old cortex, new contexts: re-purposing spatial perception for social cognition.旧皮质,新语境:重新利用空间感知进行社会认知。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Oct 8;7:645. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00645. eCollection 2013.
7
Representation of stable social dominance relations by human infants.人类婴儿对稳定社会支配关系的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 1;109(18):6862-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113194109. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
8
Mighty metaphors: behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension.强大的隐喻:行为和 ERP 证据表明权力在垂直维度上转移了注意力。
Brain Cogn. 2012 Feb;78(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
9
Big and mighty: preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance.大而有力:前语言婴儿在心理上代表社会支配地位。
Science. 2011 Jan 28;331(6016):477-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1199198.
10
Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species.跨物种的社会等级制度的神经基础。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Dec;20(6):803-9. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Sep 17.