Periglacial Research Section, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany.
Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Nov;17(6):e46-e62. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12689. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
Reliable information on past and present vegetation is important to project future changes, especially for rapidly transitioning areas such as the boreal treeline. To study past vegetation, pollen analysis is common, while current vegetation is usually assessed by field surveys. Application of detailed sedimentary DNA (sedDNA) records has the potential to enhance our understanding of vegetation changes, but studies systematically investigating the power of this proxy are rare to date. This study compares sedDNA metabarcoding and pollen records from surface sediments of 31 lakes along a north-south gradient of increasing forest cover in northern Siberia (Taymyr peninsula) with data from field surveys in the surroundings of the lakes. sedDNA metabarcoding recorded 114 plant taxa, about half of them to species level, while pollen analyses identified 43 taxa, both exceeding the 31 taxa found by vegetation field surveys. Increasing Larix percentages from north to south were consistently recorded by all three methods and principal component analyses based on percentage data of vegetation surveys and DNA sequences separated tundra from forested sites. Comparisons of the ordinations using procrustes and protest analyses show a significant fit among all compared pairs of records. Despite similarities of sedDNA and pollen records, certain idiosyncrasies, such as high percentages of Alnus and Betula in all pollen and high percentages of Salix in all sedDNA spectra, are observable. Our results from the tundra to single-tree tundra transition zone show that sedDNA analyses perform better than pollen in recording site-specific richness (i.e., presence/absence of taxa in the vicinity of the lake) and perform as well as pollen in tracing vegetation composition.
有关过去和现在植被的可靠信息对于预测未来变化非常重要,尤其是对于像北方泰梅尔半岛这样的快速过渡地区。为了研究过去的植被,花粉分析是常见的,而当前的植被通常通过实地调查来评估。应用详细的沉积 DNA(sedDNA)记录有潜力增强我们对植被变化的理解,但迄今为止,很少有研究系统地调查这种替代物的能力。本研究比较了沿北萨哈林(泰梅尔半岛)森林覆盖率逐渐增加的南北梯度的 31 个湖泊的表层沉积物中的 sedDNA metabarcoding 和花粉记录,以及湖泊周围的实地调查数据。sedDNA metabarcoding 记录了 114 种植物类群,其中约一半达到了种的水平,而花粉分析则确定了 43 种,均超过了植被实地调查发现的 31 种。所有三种方法都一致记录了从北到南的落叶松百分比增加,并且基于植被调查和 DNA 序列的百分比数据的主成分分析将苔原与森林化站点分开。使用普罗克斯特和抗议分析对排序进行比较表明,所有比较记录对之间存在显著的拟合。尽管 sedDNA 和花粉记录存在相似之处,但仍存在某些特殊性,例如所有花粉中的阿尔努斯和桦木百分比较高,以及所有 sedDNA 光谱中的柳属百分比较高。我们在苔原到单株苔原过渡带的结果表明,sedDNA 分析在记录特定地点的丰富度(即湖泊附近的类群存在/不存在)方面比花粉分析更好,并且在追踪植被组成方面与花粉分析一样好。