Pinket An-Sofie, De Craemer Marieke, Huybrechts Inge, De Bourdeaudhuij Ilse, Deforche Benedicte, Cardon Greet, Androutsos Odysseas, Koletzko Berthold, Moreno Luis A, Socha Piotr, Iotova Violeta, Manios Yannis, Van Lippevelde Wendy
Department of Public Health, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Nutrients. 2017 May 10;9(5):479. doi: 10.3390/nu9050479.
The present study aimed to examine whether a multibehavioural intervention with a focus on specific energy balance-related behaviours can affect total diet quality and its four subcomponents in European preschoolers and to investigate if these intervention effects differed by socioeconomic status (SES). Parents/caregivers of 3.5 to 5.5 year-olds ( = 4968) recruited through kindergartens in six European countries within the ToyBox-study completed questionnaires on socio-demographics and a food frequency questionnaire on their preschoolers' diet. To assess intervention effects and differences by SES, multilevel repeated measures analyses were conducted. In contrast to no significant difference in total diet quality, in both the intervention and control group, the dietary quality and dietary equilibrium increased, with a larger increase in the intervention group (mean difference : +3.4%; mean difference : +0.9%) compared to the control group (: +1.5%; : +0.2%). SES was not a significant moderator for intervention effects on total diet quality, nor for the four subcomponents. This study indicates that multibehavioural interventions with a focus on specific energy balance-related behaviours in preschoolers not only affect those targeted behaviours, but can also have more generalized effects. The ToyBox-intervention effects were similar for both lower and high SES preschoolers.
本研究旨在探讨一项侧重于特定能量平衡相关行为的多行为干预措施是否会影响欧洲学龄前儿童的总体饮食质量及其四个子成分,并调查这些干预效果是否因社会经济地位(SES)而异。在“玩具盒”研究中,通过欧洲六个国家的幼儿园招募了4968名3.5至5.5岁儿童的家长/照顾者,他们完成了关于社会人口统计学的问卷以及一份关于其学龄前儿童饮食的食物频率问卷。为了评估干预效果以及SES的差异,进行了多层次重复测量分析。与总体饮食质量无显著差异相反,在干预组和对照组中,饮食质量和饮食均衡均有所提高,与对照组相比,干预组的提高幅度更大(平均差异:+3.4%;平均差异:+0.9%),而对照组分别为(+1.5%;+0.2%)。SES对于干预对总体饮食质量及其四个子成分的效果而言,并非显著的调节因素。本研究表明,侧重于学龄前儿童特定能量平衡相关行为的多行为干预措施不仅会影响那些目标行为,还可能产生更广泛的效果。对于低SES和高SES的学龄前儿童,“玩具盒”干预效果相似。