• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学合作中的性别差异:女性比男性更主张平等主义。

Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men.

作者信息

Araújo Eduardo B, Araújo Nuno A M, Moreira André A, Herrmann Hans J, Andrade José S

机构信息

Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Campus do Pici 60451-970 Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará, Campus Acaraú 62580-000 Acaraú, Ceará, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 10;12(5):e0176791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176791. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0176791
PMID:28489872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5425184/
Abstract

By analyzing a unique dataset of more than 270,000 scientists, we discovered substantial gender differences in scientific collaborations. While men are more likely to collaborate with other men, women are more egalitarian. This is consistently observed over all fields and regardless of the number of collaborators a scientist has. The only exception is observed in the field of engineering, where this gender bias disappears with increasing number of collaborators. We also found that the distribution of the number of collaborators follows a truncated power law with a cut-off that is gender dependent and related to the gender differences in the number of published papers. Considering interdisciplinary research, our analysis shows that men and women behave similarly across fields, except in the case of natural sciences, where women with many collaborators are more likely to have collaborators from other fields.

摘要

通过分析一个包含超过27万名科学家的独特数据集,我们发现了科学合作中存在显著的性别差异。男性更倾向于与其他男性合作,而女性则更平等。在所有领域都能持续观察到这一现象,且与科学家的合作者数量无关。唯一的例外出现在工程领域,随着合作者数量的增加,这种性别偏见会消失。我们还发现,合作者数量的分布遵循截断幂律,其截止点与性别有关,并且与发表论文数量的性别差异相关。考虑到跨学科研究,我们的分析表明,除了在自然科学领域外,男性和女性在各个领域的行为相似,在自然科学领域,有许多合作者的女性更有可能有来自其他领域的合作者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66e/5425184/ee6af1b10a73/pone.0176791.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66e/5425184/f71fbc60034c/pone.0176791.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66e/5425184/ce095085794f/pone.0176791.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66e/5425184/bd9a03779908/pone.0176791.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66e/5425184/ee6af1b10a73/pone.0176791.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66e/5425184/f71fbc60034c/pone.0176791.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66e/5425184/ce095085794f/pone.0176791.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66e/5425184/bd9a03779908/pone.0176791.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b66e/5425184/ee6af1b10a73/pone.0176791.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men.科学合作中的性别差异:女性比男性更主张平等主义。
PLoS One. 2017 May 10;12(5):e0176791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176791. eCollection 2017.
2
Nanotechnology researchers' collaboration relationships: a gender analysis of access to scientific information.纳米技术研究人员的合作关系:获取科学信息的性别分析
Soc Stud Sci. 2015 Feb;45(1):100-29. doi: 10.1177/0306312714552347.
3
Using the prisms of gender and rank to interpret research collaboration power dynamics.运用性别和职级的视角来解读研究合作中的权力动态。
Soc Stud Sci. 2016 Aug;46(4):536-558. doi: 10.1177/0306312716652249. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
On the Compliance of Women Engineers with a Gendered Scientific System.女性工程师对性别化科学体系的顺应情况
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145931. eCollection 2015.
6
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
7
Facebook for scientists: requirements and services for optimizing how scientific collaborations are established.面向科学家的Facebook:优化科学合作建立方式的要求与服务。
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Aug 13;10(3):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1047.
8
Gender differences in animal cognition science.动物认知科学中的性别差异。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01777-y. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
9
Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics.有影响力的科学家更倾向于在新课题上引入合作者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 16;119(33):e2207436119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2207436119. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
10
Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.远距离跨学科合作能带来更高的科学影响力。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0122565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122565. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Silent voices: Uncovering women's absence in veterinary surgery publications.无声的声音:揭示兽医外科学出版物中女性的缺席情况。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0330392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330392. eCollection 2025.
2
Do Manuscripts by Female Evolutionary Biologists Spend Longer Under Review?女性进化生物学家撰写的手稿审稿时间会更长吗?
Mol Biol Evol. 2025 Mar 5;42(3). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaf054.
3
Sex and authorship in global cancer research.全球癌症研究中的性别与作者身份

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender.跨学科、职业阶段和性别的合作模式差异。
PLoS Biol. 2016 Nov 4;14(11):e1002573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002573. eCollection 2016 Nov.
2
Gender Gap in the ERASMUS Mobility Program.伊拉斯谟流动计划中的性别差距。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149514. eCollection 2016.
3
Gender balance: Women are funded more fairly in social science.性别平衡:在社会科学领域,女性获得的资金更为公平。
BMJ Oncol. 2024 Apr 18;3(1):e000200. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000200. eCollection 2024.
4
Self-interestedness in Research Collaboration and its Association with Career Stage and Nature of Collaboration: A Survey of Zimbabwean Researchers.科研合作中的自利行为及其与职业阶段和合作性质的关系:对津巴布韦研究人员的调查。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Oct;18(4):189-207. doi: 10.1177/15562646231192808. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
5
Long-run intergenerational health benefits of women empowerment: Evidence from suffrage movements in the US.女性赋权的长期代际健康效益:来自美国选举权运动的证据。
Health Econ. 2023 Nov;32(11):2583-2631. doi: 10.1002/hec.4744. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
6
Gender gaps in Australian research publishing, citation and co-authorship.澳大利亚研究出版、引用及合著方面的性别差距。
Scientometrics. 2023;128(5):2879-2893. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04685-7. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
7
Ten simple rules for empowering women in STEM.在科学、技术、工程和数学领域增强女性力量的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Dec 22;18(12):e1010731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010731. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Same-gender citations do not indicate a substantial gender homophily bias.同性引用并不表明存在实质性的性别同质性偏见。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 20;17(9):e0274810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274810. eCollection 2022.
9
Brazilian female researchers do not publish less despite an academic structure that deepens sex gap.巴西女性研究人员的发表成果并不少于男性,尽管学术结构加深了性别差距。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273291. eCollection 2022.
10
Burnout amongst radiologists: A bibliometric study from 1993 to 2020.放射科医生的职业倦怠:一项1993年至2020年的文献计量学研究。
World J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 19;12(2):368-378. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i2.368.
Nature. 2015 Sep 10;525(7568):181-3. doi: 10.1038/525181a.
4
The academic advantage: gender disparities in patenting.学术优势:专利申请中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0128000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128000. eCollection 2015.
5
Collaboration networks from a large CV database: dynamics, topology and bonus impact.来自大型心血管数据库的合作网络:动态、拓扑结构及额外影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 6;9(3):e90537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090537. eCollection 2014.
6
The role of gender in scholarly authorship.性别在学术著作中的作用。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e66212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212. Print 2013.
7
How women organize social networks different from men.女性如何与男性组织社交网络不同。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1214. doi: 10.1038/srep01214. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
8
The possible role of resource requirements and academic career-choice risk on gender differences in publication rate and impact.资源需求和学术职业选择风险在出版率和影响的性别差异中的可能作用。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051332. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
9
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.理科教员微妙的性别偏见偏爱男学生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
10
Careers in science. More women in science.科学领域的职业。更多女性投身科学。
Science. 2005 Aug 19;309(5738):1190-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1113252.