• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊拉斯谟流动计划中的性别差距。

Gender Gap in the ERASMUS Mobility Program.

作者信息

Böttcher Lucas, Araújo Nuno A M, Nagler Jan, Mendes José F F, Helbing Dirk, Herrmann Hans J

机构信息

Computational Physics for Engineering Materials, Institute for Building Materials, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências and Centro de Física Teórica e Computacional, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149514. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149514
PMID:26901133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4762674/
Abstract

Studying abroad has become very popular among students. The ERASMUS mobility program is one of the largest international student exchange programs in the world, which has supported already more than three million participants since 1987. We analyzed the mobility pattern within this program in 2011-12 and found a gender gap across countries and subject areas. Namely, for almost all participating countries, female students are over-represented in the ERASMUS program when compared to the entire population of tertiary students. The same tendency is observed across different subject areas. We also found a gender asymmetry in the geographical distribution of hosting institutions, with a bias of male students in Scandinavian countries. However, a detailed analysis reveals that this latter asymmetry is rather driven by subject and consistent with the distribution of gender ratios among subject areas.

摘要

出国留学在学生中变得非常流行。伊拉斯谟交流计划是世界上最大的国际学生交流计划之一,自1987年以来已经支持了超过300万参与者。我们分析了2011 - 2012年该计划中的流动模式,发现在国家和学科领域存在性别差异。也就是说,与全体高等教育学生相比,几乎所有参与国的女生在伊拉斯谟计划中的占比都过高。在不同学科领域也观察到了相同的趋势。我们还发现了接收机构地理分布上的性别不对称,在斯堪的纳维亚国家男生存在偏向。然而,详细分析表明,后一种不对称更多是由学科驱动的,并且与学科领域的性别比例分布一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/49263f2ddab3/pone.0149514.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/41ecd1da5f05/pone.0149514.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/35e6812f5b5b/pone.0149514.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/ec6b7b301941/pone.0149514.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/532e4e35711f/pone.0149514.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/49263f2ddab3/pone.0149514.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/41ecd1da5f05/pone.0149514.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/35e6812f5b5b/pone.0149514.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/ec6b7b301941/pone.0149514.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/532e4e35711f/pone.0149514.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e7c/4762674/49263f2ddab3/pone.0149514.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender Gap in the ERASMUS Mobility Program.伊拉斯谟流动计划中的性别差距。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149514. eCollection 2016.
2
Exchange programmes and student mobility: meeting student's expectations or an expensive holiday?交换项目与学生流动:满足学生期望还是昂贵的假期?
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Jan;29(1):108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
3
Gender bias in the Erasmus network of universities.伊拉斯谟大学网络中的性别偏见。
Appl Netw Sci. 2020;5(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s41109-020-00297-9. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
Erasmus exchange in the field of family medicine in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚家庭医学领域的伊拉斯谟交流项目。
Acta Med Acad. 2012;41(1):47-51. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.35.
5
Erasmus.
EDS Mag. 1990 May(1):15-7.
6
An Empirical Research on the Behavioral Perceptions of University Students on Their ERASMUS Mobilities Abroad.关于大学生对其海外 ERASMUS 流动行为感知的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 9;19(9):5756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095756.
7
Studying abroad: Exploring factors influencing nursing students' decisions to apply for clinical placements in international settings.出国留学:探究影响护理专业学生申请国际临床实习决定的因素。
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Aug;35(8):941-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
Communication and nursing: a study-abroad student's reflections.
Br J Nurs. 2015;24(21):1080-2, 1084. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2015.24.21.1080.
9
[The ECTS Project at the Free University of Brussels: evaluation of the first 3 years].
Rev Med Brux. 1992 Mar;13(3):79-82.
10
Study abroad programmes and student outcomes: Evidence from Erasmus.留学项目与学生成果:来自伊拉斯谟计划的证据。
Econ Educ Rev. 2024 Apr;99:None. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102510.

引用本文的文献

1
An Empirical Research on the Behavioral Perceptions of University Students on Their ERASMUS Mobilities Abroad.关于大学生对其海外 ERASMUS 流动行为感知的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 9;19(9):5756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095756.
2
The Impact of ERASMUS Exchanges on the Professional and Personal Development of Medical Students.《伊拉斯谟交流项目对医学生专业和个人发展的影响》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 17;18(24):13312. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413312.
3
Who benefits most from studying abroad? A conceptual and empirical overview.

本文引用的文献

1
Revealing the structure of the world airline network.揭示世界航空网络的结构。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jul 9;4:5638. doi: 10.1038/srep05638.
2
The hidden geometry of complex, network-driven contagion phenomena.复杂的网络驱动传染病现象的隐藏几何形状。
Science. 2013 Dec 13;342(6164):1337-42. doi: 10.1126/science.1245200.
3
Understanding individual human mobility patterns.理解个体的人类移动模式。
谁能从出国留学中获益最多?概念性与实证性综述。
High Educ (Dordr). 2021;82(6):1049-1069. doi: 10.1007/s10734-021-00760-1. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
4
Multi-national perceptions on challenges, opportunities, and support structures for Dual Career migrations in European student-athletes.多国对欧洲学生运动员双重职业迁移所面临的挑战、机遇和支持结构的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 25;16(6):e0253333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253333. eCollection 2021.
5
Gender bias in the Erasmus network of universities.伊拉斯谟大学网络中的性别偏见。
Appl Netw Sci. 2020;5(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s41109-020-00297-9. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than men.科学合作中的性别差异:女性比男性更主张平等主义。
PLoS One. 2017 May 10;12(5):e0176791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176791. eCollection 2017.
Nature. 2008 Jun 5;453(7196):779-82. doi: 10.1038/nature06958.