Suppr超能文献

痴呆亚型中的疼痛体验:一项系统综述。

Pain Experience in Dementia Subtypes: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Binnekade Tarik T, Van Kooten Janime, Lobbezoo Frank, Rhebergen Didi, Van der Wouden J C, Smalbrugge Martin, Scherder Erik J A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, VU University, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine and the EMGO, Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Curr Alzheimer Res. 2017;14(5):471-485. doi: 10.2174/1567205013666160602234109.

Abstract

Recently, the number of studies focusing on pain in dementia has increased considerably. Still, little attention has been paid to the influence of the neuropathology of different dementia subtypes on pain experience. In 2003, a review identified several studies that indicated a relation between dementia subtype and pain experience. Now, ten years later, an update is warranted. We conducted a systematic review to identify studies that assessed pain experience and dementia subtypes by searching PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were: (1) major dementia subtype diagnosis i.e. Alzheimer's dementia (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB); (2) age ≥60 years; and (3) pain experience. We identified twelve studies that addressed AD, three studies VaD, one study FTD, and no studies DLB. In AD, studies on clinical pain indicate a reduced pain experience compared to controls, whereas experimental studies show inconsistent findings. In VaD, clinical studies found that primary caregivers rated pain equal to cognitively intact controls, although more painful locations were reported. During self-report, elderly with VaD reported higher pain levels than cognitively intact controls. In FTD, a significantly lower pain sensitivity to experimental pain was found. Considering the limited number of studies, these findings should be considered with caution. Existing literature provides some evidence that dementia subtype affects pain experience. Further research is needed to clarify the relation between dementia subtype and pain experience as it could serve as basis for improving the assessment and management of pain in people with dementia.

摘要

最近,专注于痴呆症疼痛的研究数量大幅增加。然而,不同痴呆症亚型的神经病理学对疼痛体验的影响却很少受到关注。2003年,一项综述确定了几项表明痴呆症亚型与疼痛体验之间存在关联的研究。现在,十年过去了,有必要进行更新。我们进行了一项系统综述,通过检索PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆来确定评估疼痛体验和痴呆症亚型的研究。纳入标准为:(1)主要痴呆症亚型诊断,即阿尔茨海默病(AD)、血管性痴呆(VaD)、额颞叶痴呆(FTD)、路易体痴呆(DLB);(2)年龄≥60岁;(3)疼痛体验。我们确定了12项涉及AD的研究、3项涉及VaD的研究、1项涉及FTD的研究,未发现涉及DLB的研究。在AD中,关于临床疼痛的研究表明,与对照组相比,疼痛体验有所减少,而实验研究结果不一致。在VaD中,临床研究发现,主要照顾者对疼痛的评分与认知功能正常的对照组相同,尽管报告的疼痛部位更多。在自我报告中,患有VaD的老年人报告的疼痛程度高于认知功能正常的对照组。在FTD中,发现对实验性疼痛的疼痛敏感性显著降低。考虑到研究数量有限,这些发现应谨慎看待。现有文献提供了一些证据表明痴呆症亚型会影响疼痛体验。需要进一步研究来阐明痴呆症亚型与疼痛体验之间的关系,因为这可为改善痴呆症患者疼痛的评估和管理提供依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验