Suppr超能文献

认知障碍疼痛评估(PAIC15)工具中的可能疼痛:评估针对三个标准的临界值的敏感性和特异性

Probable Pain on the Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition (PAIC15) Instrument: Assessing Sensitivity and Specificity of Cut-Offs against Three Standards.

作者信息

van der Steen Jenny T, Westzaan Andrew, Hanemaayer Kimberley, Muhamad Muhamad, de Waal Margot W M, Achterberg Wilco P

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 29;11(7):869. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070869.

Abstract

Observational pain scales can help to identify pain in persons with dementia who may have difficulty expressing pain verbally. The Pain Assessment in Impaired Cognition-15 (PAIC15) covers 15 items that indicate pain, but it is unclear how probable pain is, for each summed score (range 0-45). We aimed to determine sensitivity and specificity of cut-offs for probable pain on the PAIC15 against three standards: (1) self-report when able, (2) the established Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) cut-off of 2, and (3) observer's overall estimate based on a series of systematic observations. We used data of 238 nursing home residents with dementia who were observed by their physician in training or nursing staff in the context of an evidence-based medicine (EBM) training study, with re-assessment after 2 months in 137 residents. The area under the ROC curve was excellent against the PAINAD cut-off (≥0.8) but acceptable or less than acceptable for the other two standards. Across standards and criteria for optimal sensitivity and specificity, PAIC15 scores of 3 and higher represent possible pain for screening in practice, with sensitivity and specificity against self-report in the 0.5 to 0.7 range. While sensitivity for screening in practice may be too low, a cut-off of 4 is reasonable to indicate probable pain in research.

摘要

观察性疼痛量表有助于识别那些可能难以用言语表达疼痛的痴呆症患者的疼痛情况。认知障碍疼痛评估量表-15(PAIC15)涵盖了15项表明疼痛的条目,但对于每个总分(范围为0至45),疼痛的可能性尚不清楚。我们旨在根据以下三个标准确定PAIC15上可能疼痛的临界值的敏感性和特异性:(1)能自我报告时的自我报告,(2)既定的晚期痴呆症疼痛评估量表(PAINAD)临界值2,以及(3)基于一系列系统观察的观察者总体估计。我们使用了238名患有痴呆症的养老院居民的数据,这些居民在循证医学(EBM)培训研究中由实习医生或护理人员进行观察,137名居民在2个月后进行了重新评估。与PAINAD临界值相比,ROC曲线下面积极佳(≥0.8),但与其他两个标准相比则为可接受或低于可接受水平。在不同标准以及最佳敏感性和特异性的标准下,PAIC15得分为3及以上代表在实际筛查中可能存在疼痛,对自我报告的敏感性和特异性在0.5至0.7范围内。虽然在实际筛查中的敏感性可能过低,但临界值为4对于在研究中表明可能存在疼痛是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd7/8301856/33f7e0811c20/brainsci-11-00869-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验