Chatterjee Shiv Sekhar, Sharma Ankush, Choudhury Shilpee, Chumber Sushil Kumar, Kaur Mandeep, Bage Ras, Parkhe Nittin, Khanduri Uma
St Stephen Hospital, Delhi, India.
Iran J Microbiol. 2016 Dec;8(6):395-400.
A single reactive IgG anti-Dengue virus ELISA test in the absence of IgM antibodies or NS1 antigen may denote current infection or past exposure to the virus. To determine whether IgG index value can be used to identify true current dengue infection we conducted a prospective observational study.
Suspected dengue patients (n =1745) were tested in their first specimen by MAC-ELISA, GAC-ELISA and NS1 antigen ELISA. Patients with MAC-ELISA and NS1Antigen non-reactive but GAC-ELISA reactive results (n =57) in their first test were followed up and repeated sampling was asked for IgG index values were calculated according to the manufacturer's instruction and classified as: low (2.2-2.5), medium (2.5-4.0) and high (>4.0).
16 out of 57 patients (28.1%) had low IgG Index value whereas 26 cases (45.6%) were categorized as medium and 15(26.3%) were classified as patients with high IgG index. Nine patients with paired reactive serology or antigen positive status were categorised as serologically confirmed dengue fever, 11 patients as not dengue with categorical evidence of other infections while the rest 37 casas with clinical, radiological and laboratory parameters suggestive of dengue but no serological confirmation as possible dengue. Among confirmed, possible and non-Dengue cases, 33.3, 32.4 and 0.0% had high Index value in comparison with 22.2, 29.7 and 27.3% showing low Index values, respectively.
Our results suggested a high IgG response in favour of true dengue infection than past exposure while no conclusions should drawn from a low or medium reactive GAC-ELISA results in the absence of IgM antibodies and NS1 Ag.
在不存在IgM抗体或NS1抗原的情况下,单次反应性IgG抗登革病毒ELISA检测可能表示当前感染或既往接触过该病毒。为了确定IgG指数值是否可用于识别真正的当前登革热感染,我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。
对疑似登革热患者(n = 1745)的首次标本进行MAC-ELISA、GAC-ELISA和NS1抗原ELISA检测。对首次检测中MAC-ELISA和NS1抗原无反应但GAC-ELISA有反应结果的患者(n = 57)进行随访,并要求重复采样以计算IgG指数值,根据制造商的说明将其分类为:低(2.2 - 2.5)、中(2.5 - 4.0)和高(>4.0)。
57例患者中有16例(28.1%)IgG指数值低,26例(45.6%)分类为中等,15例(26.3%)分类为IgG指数高的患者。9例配对反应性血清学或抗原阳性状态的患者被分类为血清学确诊的登革热,11例患者因有其他感染的确切证据而被分类为非登革热,其余37例患者的临床、影像学和实验室参数提示为登革热但无血清学确诊,可能为登革热。在确诊、可能和非登革热病例中,分别有33.3%、32.4%和0.0%的患者指数值高,相比之下,分别有22.2%、29.7%和27.3%的患者指数值低。
我们的结果表明,与既往接触相比,高IgG反应支持真正的登革热感染,而在不存在IgM抗体和NS1抗原的情况下,不应从低或中等反应性的GAC-ELISA结果得出结论。