Suppr超能文献

粪便钙卫蛋白检测方法在预测儿童炎症性肠病复发中的比较。

Comparison of Fecal Calprotectin Methods for Predicting Relapse of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

机构信息

Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4K1.

Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2017:1450970. doi: 10.1155/2017/1450970. Epub 2017 Apr 16.

Abstract

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is on the rise worldwide. Endoscopies are necessary for IBD assessment but are invasive, expensive, and inconvenient. Recently, fecal calprotectin (FCal) was proposed as a noninvasive and specific marker of gut inflammation. We evaluated the analytical performance of three FCal assays and their clinical performance in predicting relapse in pediatric IBD. This study used 40 pediatric IBD and 40 random non-IBD patients' fecal samples. Two automated ELISAs (Bühlmann and PhiCal® Calprotectin-EIA) and an EliA (Phadia 250 EliA-Calprotectin) were used to evaluate the analytical performance. The clinical performance was assessed by PhiCal Calprotectin-EIA, EliA-Calprotectin, and Bühlmann immunochromatographic point-of-care test (POCT). All assays displayed acceptable analytical performance below and above the medical decision cut-off [imprecision (CV < 10% intra-assay; <15% interassay); linearity (overall mean % deviation < 16.5%)]. The agreement with PhiCal Calprotectin-EIA was 100% and 78.6% for Bühlmann (95% CI, 87.5-100; Kappa: 1) and EliA-Calprotectin (95% CI, 60.5-89.8; Kappa: 0.32), respectively, and 63.6% between Bühlmann and EliA-Calprotectin (95% CI, 46.6-77.8; Kappa: 0.16). All assays evaluated had similar clinical performance [AUC: 0.84 (EliA-Calprotectin); 0.83 (POCT and PhiCal Calprotectin-EIA)]. FCal levels determined using the same method and assay together with clinical history would be a noninvasive and useful tool in monitoring pediatric IBD.

摘要

儿科炎症性肠病(IBD)在全球范围内呈上升趋势。内镜检查对于 IBD 的评估是必要的,但具有侵入性、昂贵且不便。最近,粪便钙卫蛋白(FCal)被提出作为肠道炎症的非侵入性和特异性标志物。我们评估了三种 FCal 检测方法的分析性能及其在预测儿科 IBD 复发中的临床性能。

本研究使用了 40 名儿科 IBD 和 40 名随机非 IBD 患者的粪便样本。使用两种自动化 ELISA(Bühlmann 和 PhiCal® Calprotectin-EIA)和一种 EliA(Phadia 250 EliA-Calprotectin)来评估分析性能。PhiCal Calprotectin-EIA、EliA-Calprotectin 和 Bühlmann 免疫层析即时检验(POCT)用于评估临床性能。

所有检测方法在医学决策截断值以下和以上均显示出可接受的分析性能[精密度(CV<10% 室内;<15% 室间);线性(总体平均%偏差<16.5%)]。与 PhiCal Calprotectin-EIA 的一致性为 100%和 78.6%,Bühlmann(95%CI,87.5-100;Kappa:1)和 EliA-Calprotectin(95%CI,60.5-89.8;Kappa:0.32),Bühlmann 和 EliA-Calprotectin 之间的一致性为 63.6%(95%CI,46.6-77.8;Kappa:0.16)。所有评估的检测方法具有相似的临床性能[AUC:0.84(EliA-Calprotectin);0.83(POCT 和 PhiCal Calprotectin-EIA)]。使用相同方法和检测方法与临床病史一起确定的 FCal 水平将成为监测儿科 IBD 的一种非侵入性和有用的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83bc/5410371/1359a78419c8/CJGH2017-1450970.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验