Bevilacqua Guarniero Francisco, Bellinghini Ruth Helena, Gattaz Wagner Farid
a Departamento e Instituto de Psiquiatria do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IPq-HCFMUSP) , São Paulo , Brazil.
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;29(3):241-247. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2017.1285976. Epub 2017 May 11.
Schizophrenia is the most common illness used today as a metaphor in the media and routinely appears associated with crime and violence with no medical or scientific rigor, reinforcing the stigma against this disorder. Evaluation of the presence of structural stigma in the Brazilian media by means of a survey of printed news and the Internet using the term schizophrenia and its correlates under three aspects: (a) medical and scientific uses, (b) assigning a diagnosis of schizophrenia to crime suspects with little or no medical or scientific rigor, and (c) the metaphorical use. The study was conducted in three stages: search for publications, classification of items found and analysis of the context in which they were published. The survey was conducted in two periods: 2008 and 2011, the first being restricted to the newspaper Folha de S. Paulo and the second extended to the homepage of the main Brazilian print media. We found 229 texts, distributed as follows: 89 (39%) records as science and health, with a tendency to impersonality; 62 (27%) records as crime and violence, in which the 'diagnosis' of schizophrenia is given by lay people and 'supported' by an archeology of the life of the suspect which enlists all sorts of non-standard behavior; and 78 (34%) records of metaphorical use, always with a negative meaning. Most of the texts found (a) does not give voice to people with schizophrenia and their suffering, (b) trivializes the use of this psychiatric illness out of context to describe contradictory or of dubious character political and economic decisions, and
精神分裂症是当今媒体最常用来作隐喻的疾病,并且常常毫无医学或科学依据地与犯罪和暴力联系在一起,这加剧了对这种疾病的污名化。通过对印刷新闻和互联网进行调查,从三个方面评估巴西媒体中结构性污名的存在情况,这三个方面分别是:(a)医学和科学用途;(b)在几乎没有医学或科学依据的情况下将精神分裂症诊断用于犯罪嫌疑人;(c)隐喻性用法。该研究分三个阶段进行:搜索出版物、对所发现的条目进行分类以及分析其发表的背景。调查分两个时期进行:2008年和2011年,第一个时期仅限于《圣保罗页报》,第二个时期扩展到巴西主要印刷媒体的主页。我们发现了229篇文本,分布如下:89篇(39%)记录为科学与健康类,倾向于客观陈述;62篇(27%)记录为犯罪与暴力类,其中精神分裂症的“诊断”由非专业人士做出,并通过罗列嫌疑人各种不规范行为的生活经历来“支持”;78篇(34%)记录为隐喻性用法,且总是带有负面含义。所发现的大多数文本(a)没有表达精神分裂症患者及其痛苦;(b)脱离背景地将这种精神疾病的使用 trivializes(此处trivializes原词有误,推测可能是“使……变得微不足道”之类的意思,暂按此理解翻译),用于描述矛盾或性质可疑的政治和经济决策,并且