Suppr超能文献

生活影响烧伤恢复评估(LIBRE)概况的制定:评估烧伤幸存者的社会参与情况。

Development of the life impact burn recovery evaluation (LIBRE) profile: assessing burn survivors' social participation.

作者信息

Kazis Lewis E, Marino Molly, Ni Pengsheng, Soley Bori Marina, Amaya Flor, Dore Emily, Ryan Colleen M, Schneider Jeff C, Shie Vivian, Acton Amy, Jette Alan M

机构信息

Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Center for the Assessment of Pharmaceutical Practices (CAPP), Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Health & Disability Research Institute, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, T5W, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2017 Oct;26(10):2851-2866. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1588-3. Epub 2017 May 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Measuring the impact burn injuries have on social participation is integral to understanding and improving survivors' quality of life, yet there are no existing instruments that comprehensively measure the social participation of burn survivors. This project aimed to develop the Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation Profile (LIBRE), a patient-reported multidimensional assessment for understanding the social participation after burn injuries.

METHODS

192 questions representing multiple social participation areas were administered to a convenience sample of 601 burn survivors. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to identify the underlying structure of the data. Using item response theory methods, a Graded Response Model was applied for each identified sub-domain. The resultant multidimensional LIBRE Profile can be administered via Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) or fixed short forms.

RESULTS

The study sample included 54.7% women with a mean age of 44.6 (SD 15.9) years. The average time since burn injury was 15.4 years (0-74 years) and the average total body surface area burned was 40% (1-97%). The CFA indicated acceptable fit statistics (CFI range 0.913-0.977, TLI range 0.904-0.974, RMSEA range 0.06-0.096). The six unidimensional scales were named: relationships with family and friends, social interactions, social activities, work and employment, romantic relationships, and sexual relationships. The marginal reliability of the full item bank and CATs ranged from 0.84 to 0.93, with ceiling effects less than 15% for all scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The LIBRE Profile is a promising new measure of social participation following a burn injury that enables burn survivors and their care providers to measure social participation.

摘要

目的

衡量烧伤对社会参与的影响对于理解和改善幸存者的生活质量至关重要,但目前尚无全面衡量烧伤幸存者社会参与情况的工具。本项目旨在开发生活影响烧伤恢复评估量表(LIBRE),这是一种患者报告的多维评估工具,用于了解烧伤后的社会参与情况。

方法

对601名烧伤幸存者的便利样本进行了192个代表多个社会参与领域的问题调查。采用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析(CFA)来确定数据的潜在结构。使用项目反应理论方法,对每个识别出的子领域应用等级反应模型。最终得到的多维LIBRE量表可通过计算机自适应测试(CAT)或固定简短形式进行施测。

结果

研究样本包括54.7%的女性,平均年龄为44.6(标准差15.9)岁。烧伤后的平均时间为15.4年(0 - 74年),平均烧伤总面积为40%(1 - 97%)。CFA表明拟合统计量可接受(CFI范围为0.913 - 0.977,TLI范围为0.904 - 0.974,RMSEA范围为0.06 - 0.096)。六个单维量表分别命名为:与家人和朋友的关系、社交互动、社会活动、工作与就业、恋爱关系和性关系。整个题库和CAT的边际信度范围为0.84至0.93,所有量表的天花板效应均小于15%。

结论

LIBRE量表是一种很有前景的烧伤后社会参与新测量工具,能够让烧伤幸存者及其护理提供者测量社会参与情况。

相似文献

1
Development of the life impact burn recovery evaluation (LIBRE) profile: assessing burn survivors' social participation.
Qual Life Res. 2017 Oct;26(10):2851-2866. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1588-3. Epub 2017 May 10.
2
Reliability & validity of the LIBRE Profile.
Burns. 2018 Nov;44(7):1750-1758. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
Impact of Work-Related Burn Injury on Social Reintegration Outcomes: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jan;101(1S):S86-S91. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Nov 26.
7
Developing Item Response Theory-Based Short Forms to Measure the Social Impact of Burn Injuries.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):521-528. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.037. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
The Impact of Burn Size on Community Participation: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study.
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):1056-1062. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004703. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
10
Sexual activity and romantic relationships after burn injury: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) study.
Burns. 2020 Nov;46(7):1556-1564. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

7
Physical and psychosocial outcomes among burn-injured people with heterotopic ossification: A burn model system study.
Burns. 2024 May;50(4):957-965. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
8
Development of the Preschool Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (PS-LIBRE1-5) Profile.
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Jan 5;45(1):136-144. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad136.
10
Impact of the Early COVID-19 Pandemic on Burn Care: A Multi-National Study.
J Burn Care Res. 2023 May 2;44(3):580-589. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irac076.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a Conceptual Framework to Measure the Social Impact of Burns.
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Nov/Dec;37(6):e569-e578. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000358.
2
Measuring the Social Impact of Burns on Survivors.
J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;38(1):e377-e383. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000398.
3
Recovery Curves for Pediatric Burn Survivors: Advances in Patient-Oriented Outcomes.
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jun 1;170(6):534-42. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4722.
5
The PROMIS satisfaction with social participation measures demonstrated responsiveness in diverse clinical populations.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.034. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
7
The treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder and related psychosocial consequences of burn injury: a pilot study.
J Burn Care Res. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):184-92. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000177.
8
Quantifying 'problematic' DIF within an IRT framework: application to a cancer stigma index.
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jan;24(1):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0540-4. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
10
Return to work after burn injury: a systematic review.
J Burn Care Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):101-9. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182374439.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验