Auer S Riley, Matandirotya Newton, Mathe Prince, Moyo Musawenkosi, Sherburne Lisa, Dickin Katherine L
JSI Research & Training Institute, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
Kgotso Development Trust, Beitbridge, Matabeleland South, Zimbabwe.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;4(10):e0003525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003525. eCollection 2024.
Peer support groups are implemented globally, and viewed as cost-effective, scalable platforms for delivering health and nutrition programming. Quality is important for participation and achieving social and behavior change goals. Little research has explored the perspectives of peer group participants on quality. This manuscript describes community-based implementation research, and associated findings, which was conducted to learn how participants of a nutrition and health program define quality peer groups and how they suggest improving peer groups. In-depth interviews on experiences, benefits, and challenges were conducted with participants of health and nutrition peer groups, including group members (n = 64) and facilitators (n = 30), in three districts in Zimbabwe. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically and preliminary results were presented in six follow-up focus group discussions with interviewees to provide input on results and interpretation. Peer groups met some of participants' needs for knowledge, social support, and visible improvements in their lives and homes. Participants described generally positive experiences that sustained participation and motivated behavior change. They highlighted group dynamics, interactive facilitation, and community recognition which support the credibility and motivation of group facilitators. Implementation could be improved by strengthening family engagement and more hands-on learning for encouraging participation. Local adaptation of group activities can address influences on behavior change and increase relevance to participants' needs. The perspectives of core stakeholders are essential to understand what aspects of peer groups are most important to implement the approach with quality across contexts. Implementation research and continued monitoring to understand participant perspectives should be an integral part of all programs to ensure the application of adult learning principles and an appropriate balance between fidelity and adaptation for local relevance and engagement.
同伴支持小组在全球范围内得到实施,并被视为提供健康和营养项目的具有成本效益且可扩展的平台。质量对于参与以及实现社会和行为改变目标至关重要。很少有研究探讨同伴小组参与者对质量的看法。本手稿描述了基于社区的实施研究及相关发现,该研究旨在了解营养与健康项目的参与者如何定义高质量的同伴小组以及他们对改进同伴小组有何建议。在津巴布韦的三个地区,对健康和营养同伴小组的参与者进行了关于经历、益处和挑战的深入访谈,包括小组成员(n = 64)和 facilitators(n = 30)。对定性数据进行了主题分析,并在与受访者进行的六次后续焦点小组讨论中呈现了初步结果,以便就结果和解读提供意见。同伴小组满足了参与者在知识、社会支持以及他们生活和家庭中明显改善方面的一些需求。参与者描述了总体上积极的经历,这些经历维持了参与并激发了行为改变。他们强调了小组动态、互动式促进以及社区认可,这些支持了小组 facilitators 的可信度和积极性。通过加强家庭参与以及更多实践学习以鼓励参与,可以改进实施过程。小组活动的本地化调整可以应对对行为改变的影响,并提高与参与者需求的相关性。核心利益相关者的观点对于理解同伴小组的哪些方面对于在不同情境下高质量实施该方法最为重要至关重要。实施研究和持续监测以了解参与者的观点应成为所有项目的一个组成部分,以确保应用成人学习原则,并在保真度和为本地相关性及参与度进行调整之间取得适当平衡。