Brignardello-Petersen Romina, Guyatt Gordon H, Buchbinder Rachelle, Poolman Rudolf W, Schandelmaier Stefan, Chang Yaping, Sadeghirad Behnam, Evaniew Nathan, Vandvik Per O
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Evidence-Based Dentistry Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
BMJ Open. 2017 May 11;7(5):e016114. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016114.
To determine the effects and complications of arthroscopic surgery compared with conservative management strategies in patients with degenerative knee disease.
Systematic review.
Pain, function, adverse events.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar and Open Grey up to August 2016.
For effects, randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing arthroscopic surgery with a conservative management strategy (including sham surgery) in patients with degenerative knee disease. For complications, RCTs and observational studies.
Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for patient-important outcomes. A parallel guideline committee ( Rapid Recommendations) provided input on the design and interpretation of the systematic review, including selection of patient-important outcomes. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty (quality) of the evidence.
We included 13 RCTs and 12 observational studies. With respect to pain, the review identified high-certainty evidence that knee arthroscopy results in a very small reduction in pain up to 3 months (mean difference =5.4 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 2.0 to 8.8) and very small or no pain reduction up to 2 years (mean difference =3.1, 95% CI -0.2 to 6.4) when compared with conservative management. With respect to function, the review identified moderate-certainty evidence that knee arthroscopy results in a very small improvement in the short term (mean difference =4.9 on a 100-point scale, 95% CI 1.5 to 8.4) and very small or no improved function up to 2 years (mean difference =3.2, 95% CI -0.5 to 6.8). Alternative presentations of magnitude of effect, and associated sensitivity analyses, were consistent with the findings of the primary analysis. Low-quality evidence suggested a very low probability of serious complications after knee arthroscopy.
Over the long term, patients who undergo knee arthroscopy versus those who receive conservative management strategies do not have important benefits in pain or function.
PROSPERO CRD42016046242.
确定与退行性膝病患者的保守治疗策略相比,关节镜手术的效果及并发症。
系统评价。
疼痛、功能、不良事件。
截至2016年8月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、谷歌学术和Open Grey。
对于效果,纳入比较关节镜手术与退行性膝病患者保守治疗策略(包括假手术)的随机临床试验(RCT)。对于并发症,纳入RCT和观察性研究。
两名评价者独立提取数据并评估对患者重要结局的偏倚风险。一个平行的指南委员会(快速推荐)为系统评价的设计和解释提供意见,包括患者重要结局的选择。我们采用GRADE方法对证据的确定性(质量)进行分级。
我们纳入了13项RCT和12项观察性研究。关于疼痛,该评价确定了高质量证据,即与保守治疗相比,关节镜检查在3个月内导致疼痛有非常小的减轻(100分制下平均差异=5.4,95%CI 2.0至8.8),在2年内疼痛减轻非常小或无减轻(平均差异=3.1,95%CI -0.2至6.4)。关于功能,该评价确定了中等质量证据,即关节镜检查在短期内导致功能有非常小的改善(100分制下平均差异=4.9,95%CI 1.5至8.4),在2年内功能改善非常小或无改善(平均差异=3.2,95%CI -0.5至6.8)。效应大小的其他呈现方式及相关敏感性分析与主要分析结果一致。低质量证据表明关节镜检查后严重并发症的可能性非常低。
从长期来看,接受关节镜检查的患者与接受保守治疗策略的患者相比,在疼痛或功能方面没有显著益处。
PROSPERO CRD42016046242。