• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Shared decision making: everyone wants it, so why isn't it happening?

作者信息

Coulter Angela

机构信息

Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston and Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):117-118. doi: 10.1002/wps.20407.

DOI:10.1002/wps.20407
PMID:28498596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5428189/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Shared decision making: everyone wants it, so why isn't it happening?共同决策：人人都想要它，可为什么它没有实现呢？
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):117-118. doi: 10.1002/wps.20407.
2
Reducing inequality benefits everyone - so why isn't it happening?减少不平等对每个人都有益——那么为什么这种情况没有发生呢？
Nature. 2023 Aug;620(7974):468. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-02551-3.
3
Rehabilitation after critical illness-why it isn't happening.危重症后的康复——为何尚未实现。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 17;374:n2240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2240.
4
The baccalaureate isn't for everyone.学士学位并不适合每个人。
Radiol Technol. 1997 Jan-Feb;68(3):193.
5
Why isn't everyone doing research?为什么不是每个人都在做研究？
J R Army Med Corps. 2013 Jun;159(2):66-7. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2013-000097.
6
Death by mosquito. Malaria, like AIDS, is killing millions. But unlike AIDS, it can be cured. Why isn't that happening?死于蚊虫叮咬。疟疾和艾滋病一样，正夺走数百万人的生命。但与艾滋病不同的是，疟疾是可以治愈的。为什么情况并非如此呢？
Time. 2004 Jul 26;164(4):50-2.
7
Outcomes: why isn't everyone doing this?结果：为什么不是每个人都在这样做？
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 2001 Oct;10(5):22-3, 42.
8
If everyone's on our side, why isn't everyone talking about research?如果每个人都站在我们这边，为什么不是每个人都在谈论这项研究呢？
Am J Med. 2001 Oct 15;111(6):509-12. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00950-0.
9
Is subacute care right for you? This proverbial pot of gold isn't for everyone.亚急性护理适合你吗？这一众所周知的“金罐子”并非适合所有人。
Contemp Longterm Care. 1994 Jun;17(6):32-4, 36, 38 passim.
10
If hepatitis C therapy is so great, why isn't everyone doing it?如果丙型肝炎疗法如此有效，为什么不是每个人都在接受治疗呢？
Am J Transplant. 2018 Oct;18(10):2382-2383. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14960. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living With Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review (Part 2-Designing SDM Interventions: Optimizing Design and Local Implementation).从理想主义者到现实主义者——为精神病患者抗精神病药物处方选择设计并实施共享决策干预措施（SHAPE）：一项现实主义综述（第2部分——设计共享决策干预措施：优化设计与本地实施）
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):932-948. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf059.
2
"Developing the tool SDM:KOMPASS. Supporting shared decision making implementation processes".开发工具 SDM:KOMPASS，支持共享决策制定实施过程。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0312990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312990. eCollection 2024.
3
Shared decision making for patients needing dentofacial orthopedics, orthognathic surgery, and conventional non-surgical fixed appliance therapy: a comparison between Pakistani patients' and clinicians' perspective.需要正颌正畸、正颌手术和传统非手术固定矫治器治疗的患者的共同决策：巴基斯坦患者和临床医生观点的比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2024 Sep 2;29(4):e242443. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.29.4.e242443.oar. eCollection 2024.
4
Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.精神卫生保健中的支持性决策干预措施：当前证据及实施障碍的系统评价
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14001. doi: 10.1111/hex.14001.
5
"SDM:HOSP"- a generic model for hospital-based implementation of shared decision making.“SDM:HOSP”- 一种基于医院的共享决策制定实施的通用模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 24;18(1):e0280547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280547. eCollection 2023.
6
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
7
The effects of COVID-19 on respiratory muscle performance: making the case for respiratory muscle testing and training.COVID-19 对呼吸肌功能的影响：呼吁开展呼吸肌测试和训练。
Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Oct 5;31(166). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0006-2022. Print 2022 Dec 31.
8
More than a fleeting conversation: managing medication communication across transitions of care.不止是短暂的交谈：管理医疗照护转换期间的用药沟通
Med J Aust. 2022 Aug 15;217(4):176-177. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51651. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
9
Influencing factors of lung cancer patients' participation in shared decision-making: a cross-sectional study.影响肺癌患者参与共享决策的因素：一项横断面研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec;148(12):3303-3312. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04105-y. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
10
Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality.透析方式的共同决策
Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Oct 30;7(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.10.019. eCollection 2022 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.在常规精神卫生保健中实施共同决策。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;16(2):146-153. doi: 10.1002/wps.20412.
2
'Montgomery consent': decision of the UK Supreme Court. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [20151. [2015] UKSC 11; [2015] WLR 768.“蒙哥马利同意原则”：英国最高法院的裁决。蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡健康委员会案[2015年]。[2015]英国最高法院案例汇编第11号；[2015]《每周法律报告》第768页。
Pract Midwife. 2016 Jun;19(6):27-9.
3
Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions.为患有慢性或长期健康问题的成年人制定个性化护理计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 3;2015(3):CD010523. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010523.pub2.
4
Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.旨在支持共同决策的干预措施能否减少健康不平等？一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094670. eCollection 2014.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
6
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare.共同决策：真正将患者置于医疗保健的中心。
BMJ. 2012 Jan 27;344:e256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e256.